On 01/28/2010 08:49 PM, Paul wrote:
> On 01/28/2010 06:54 PM, Firestrm wrote:
>>
>> Is anyone else having install problems with Bacula 5 for Windows 64bit?
>>
>> I'm running Windows 7 64bit (pro) and Bacula 3.2 worked fine. Although the
>> install had it's quirks, I was able to fix the file permiss
On 01/28/2010 06:54 PM, Firestrm wrote:
>
> Is anyone else having install problems with Bacula 5 for Windows 64bit?
>
> I'm running Windows 7 64bit (pro) and Bacula 3.2 worked fine. Although the
> install had it's quirks, I was able to fix the file permissions so
bacula-fd
> would run.
>
> Now h
On 01/28/2010 06:54 PM, Firestrm wrote:
>
> Is anyone else having install problems with Bacula 5 for Windows 64bit?
>
> I'm running Windows 7 64bit (pro) and Bacula 3.2 worked fine. Although the
> install had it's quirks, I was able to fix the file permissions so bacula-fd
> would run.
>
> Now h
Is anyone else having install problems with Bacula 5 for Windows 64bit?
I'm running Windows 7 64bit (pro) and Bacula 3.2 worked fine. Although the
install had it's quirks, I was able to fix the file permissions so bacula-fd
would run.
Now however I'm not having any file permission problems but t
