Dan Langille wrote:
>
> On Feb 18, 2008, at 1:01 PM, Tom Allison wrote:
>
>> Way back when I had some tape drives. At that time Linux could not
>> provide compression on tape drives. Especially if you where trying to
>> write across multiple tapes.
>>
>&
Way back when I had some tape drives. At that time Linux could not
provide compression on tape drives. Especially if you where trying to
write across multiple tapes.
Is this still true?
So if I'm looking at a tape drive that says it is an 80/204GB type, I
should use 80GB for my calculations
On Feb 16, 2008, at 11:48 AM, Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 16, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Tom Allison wrote:
>
>>
>> Dan Langille wrote:
>>> On Feb 15, 2008, at 11:29 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
>>>> On Feb 15, 2008, at 10:10 PM, Brian
So is it safe to assume that ports does not have a bacula client for Mac
OS/X?
I am really not inclined to start adding multiple port managers on top
of my Macbook. A recipe for disaster. I've already invested a lot with
port.
And I'll also assume there are no binaries available?
Any exper
On Sep 26, 2007, at 2:03 AM, Eric Böse-Wolf wrote:
> Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I thought I caught a thread on this mailing list about Debian.
>>
>> I have a box with postgresql 8.2 installed on it and is well suited
>> for putting bacu
I thought I caught a thread on this mailing list about Debian.
I have a box with postgresql 8.2 installed on it and is well suited
for putting bacula on it.
But when I tried to install the debian packages I got hung up on the
packages trying to install postgresql 8.1 (or at least some part of
