Re: [Bacula-users] building bacula 9.6.3 with openssl-1.1.1

2020-06-03 Thread Philip Brown
I have done so more compiling of openssl and I can confirm that this is not a problem with having the "api=*.*.*". Bacula seems to work fine on a standard compile of openssl-1.1.1.  (apart from the slight "./configure" modification) From what I have tracked down it looks like one of the LDFLAGS i

Re: [Bacula-users] building bacula 9.6.3 with openssl-1.1.1

2020-06-01 Thread Philip Brown
er and tls_bsock_accept might show where > the problem occurs. > > __Martin > > >>>>>> On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 17:40:25 +0200, Philip Brown said: >> Hi Martin, >> >> I tried this earlier on to trick "./configure" and led to failure in >> ope

Re: [Bacula-users] building bacula 9.6.3 with openssl-1.1.1

2020-06-01 Thread Philip Brown
Hi Martin, I tried this earlier on to trick "./configure" and led to failure in operation. However, I have tried again with your suggestion, it builds fine. Only the following warnings, which I assume are not related: configure: WARNING: term.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING:

Re: [Bacula-users] Basics of defining a storage pool

2020-06-01 Thread Philip Brown
On 6/1/20 10:11 AM, Ryan Sizemore wrote: > I am setting up bacula and would appreciate some help in understanding > some of the basics. I apologize in advance since some of these > questions are somewhat basic, yet my google abilities have proved > fruitless. > > I have a pair of LTO4 drives that w

[Bacula-users] building bacula 9.6.3 with openssl-1.1.1

2020-06-01 Thread Philip Brown
Hello Baculistas, I see from the 9.0.6 release notes it is said that Bacula can now be built with openSSL-1.1.1. I have been building bacula 9.6.3 for omnios which comes with openssl-1.0.2 and 1.1.1 (with --api=1.0.0) but could not  get the TLS parts working. I built my own version of openssl-1.1

[Bacula-users] building bacula 9.6.3 with openssl-1.1.1

2020-06-01 Thread Philip Brown
Hello Baculistas, I see from the 9.0.6 release notes it is said that Bacula can now be built with openSSL-1.1.1. I have been building bacula 9.6.3 for omnios which comes with openssl-1.0.2 and 1.1.1 (with --api=1.0.0) but could not  get the TLS parts working. I built my own version of openssl-1.1

Re: [Bacula-users] Question about job and file retention.

2016-03-30 Thread Philip Brown
On 03/30/2016 12:05 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > On 2016-03-30 at 11:48:31 Philip Brown wrote: > >> On 03/30/2016 08:34 AM, Erik P. Olsen wrote: >>> How do I change the job and file retention values? I've changed the >>> values in bacula-dir.conf but I also have

Re: [Bacula-users] Question about job and file retention.

2016-03-30 Thread Philip Brown
On 03/30/2016 08:34 AM, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > How do I change the job and file retention values? I've changed the > values in bacula-dir.conf but I also have to change them in the > catalogue and I can't find how to do it with bconsole. > this should help you out... http://bacula.10910.n7.nabble

Re: [Bacula-users] possible bug in bacula-sd, relating to Type=Files and autochanger

2010-11-15 Thread Philip Brown
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > . > > The project needs more people.  Can you help?  It is things like this for > which patches are required.  :) > I'd be willing to help... the problem is, I dont feel that I sufficiently understand the subject to write an update. Somet

Re: [Bacula-users] possible bug in bacula-sd, relating to Type=Files and autochanger

2010-11-12 Thread Philip Brown
Martin Simmons writes: >Have you looked at how the regression tests do it? In particular: >http://bacula.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=bacula/bacula;a=blob;f=regress/scripts/bacula-sd-2disk.conf.in;h=7f8f33e9fb1b896aa65db3739dda1d2d367b4154;hb=HEAD >I don't know if that works, but it is s

[Bacula-users] possible bug in bacula-sd, relating to Type=Files and autochanger

2010-11-11 Thread Philip Brown
(sorry for potential repeat: Sent from a non-subscribed address previously) Hello, I've been wrestling with configuration of a filesystem based autochanger, aka the 'disk-changer' script. I've made some progress, but have hit a point where I believe a bug in the core sd libraries (specifically a