Hello Bob,
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 16:09 -0500, Bob Hetzel wrote:
> 1) Make sure all the firmwares are up to date: the 1068E card, the tape
> drives, specifically. While you're at it, make sure the Adaptec card has
> up to date firmware too.
Drives, Library, Adaptec cards have the most recent fi
Hi!
We're seeing strange behaviour with Bacula 5.0.3 on Debian/Squeeze and
Kernels 2.6.36 and 2.6.32 (for a while, we've had CentOS 5 for testing,
but that didn't change a thing).
See the 'btape fill' results below, the write speed doesn't get above
50MB/s - the tape drive is an ULTRIUM-HH4 LTO4
Am Montag, den 21.06.2010, 11:27 -0400 schrieb John Drescher:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Lukas Kolbe wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 21.06.2010, 11:06 +0100 schrieb Alan Brown:
> >> On 21/06/10 10:56, Lukas Kolbe wrote:
> >> >
> >> > For comparison, I
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 11:54 +0200, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
> 2010/6/20 Lukas Kolbe
> Hi!
>
>
> Hi,
>
> We use a Tandberg autochanger with two IBM Ultrium LTO-4
> drives behind a
> 24-disk RAID50. When used with with
Am Montag, den 21.06.2010, 11:06 +0100 schrieb Alan Brown:
> On 21/06/10 10:56, Lukas Kolbe wrote:
> >
> > For comparison, I dd'ed a volume to /dev/null while the copy job was
> > running:
> > [r...@shepherd ~]# dd if=/var/bacula/dp/fs1/Vol0070 of=/dev/null bs
Am Montag, den 21.06.2010, 01:20 +0200 schrieb Lukas Kolbe:
> Thanks for the hints. Changing the block sizes to the ones you mentioned
> doesn't help unfortunatly.
>
> Maybe it is a completely different problem: The backups are made to the
> diskpool in parallel, from a f
Am Montag, den 21.06.2010, 09:30 +1200 schrieb richard:
> Lukas Kolbe wrote:
> :
> >
> > I suppose it has something todo with the tapes' maximum blocksize being
> > higher than what Linux supports.
>
> I have the following in my sd with LTO4 attached and it
Hi!
We use a Tandberg autochanger with two IBM Ultrium LTO-4 drives behind a
24-disk RAID50. When used with with testdata and dd or tar (in dd's case
with bs=1M), both drives get acceptable rates of around 170MiB per
second. However, when used with bacula for a copy job (Our default pool
is the di
Hi!
I have the following pools:
*list pools
++-+-+-+--+-+
| poolid | name| numvols | maxvols | pooltype | labelformat |
++-+-+-+--+-+
| 1 | Default | 0 | 0 | Backup | *
