On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 11:54 +0200, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote: > 2010/6/20 Lukas Kolbe <l-li...@einfachkaffee.de> > Hi! > > > Hi, > > We use a Tandberg autochanger with two IBM Ultrium LTO-4 > drives behind a > 24-disk RAID50. When used with with testdata and dd or tar (in > dd's case > with bs=1M), both drives get acceptable rates of around 170MiB > per > second. However, when used with bacula for a copy job (Our > default pool > is the diskpool, the jobs get copied to tape during the day), > only > 20MiB/second get written to the tape, while bacula-sd consumes > a full > cpu. > > It seems that it is a problem mentioned on bacula-devel list last > month, see: > http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-de...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg06423.html > > If it is a problem for you, try avoid copy jobs or prepare to migrate > to Bacula Enterprise in near future: > http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-de...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg06492.html > or fix the problem by yourself.
Thanks for the links! I didn't realize Bacula was mostly a one-person/company-effort as of yet. We'll have to think about a subscription in the mid-term future. I'm quite sure that our throughput problem is of an entirely different nature though (see my other mail from today), and hopefully we'll get to the bottom of it soon(ish). -- Regards, Lukas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
