John Drescher escribió:
> You do not want concurrent jobs on your LTO3 but you do with your
> disk? I would have it the other way since disk is generally slower
> than tape. Not using compression with the disk?
>
>
> BTW, I do not know the answer to your real question. I have my disk
> storage on
There's been an interesting thread about the limitations of the
storage/device model in Bacula, and i think i'm hitting one of those
limitations, or maybe a configuration error:
I have 1 Storage daemon with 1 File device, 1 autochanger with 1 Tape
device.
I want to make concurrent backups to t
> Looks similar to the issue I reported last April:
>
> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:08:06 +0200
> Subject: tape use period counted from when use should have started instead of
> when it did
>
> Had your job been running for more than 12 hours at the time this
> happened? Then this behaviour is app
John Drescher escribió:
>> How long was each tape used?
>>
> Forget that I see what you are talking about. I think this warrants a
> bug report.
>
> John
Thanks for the reply. After updating the tapes, this weekend didn't
happen, possibly it's going to be hard to reproduce...
Cheers,
--
José
I have a bit of a poltergeist here. I have configured 12 hour max volume
use duration:
Pool {
Name = Semanal
Pool Type = Backup
Recycle = yes
AutoPrune = yes
Volume Retention = 25 days
Volume Use Duration = 12h
}
Last weekend the backups failed because all volumes were used, an
Eric Rousse wrote:
>
> I tried the heartbeat interval = 600, in my bacula-dir.conf file, for
> that specific client. And still no good.
Did you also set the Heartbeat interval in the client configuration?
Cheers,
--
José E. Molina
Técnico de Sistemas
Brújula
T. +34 971 433 909 - F. +34 971 43
