John Drescher escribió: > You do not want concurrent jobs on your LTO3 but you do with your > disk? I would have it the other way since disk is generally slower > than tape. Not using compression with the disk? > > > BTW, I do not know the answer to your real question. I have my disk > storage on a different machine than my 2 drive autochager. > > John
Hi John, thanks for the reply, do you do backups at the same time in both of your autochangers? If so, I guess I'd need 2 storage daemons in the same machine to make concurrent backups to different devices. As for the LTO3, i'll possibly go for concurrent backups "everywhere", that'll be easier than having 2 storage daemons on the same machine. I didn't do it before because I wanted to keep straight easily recoverable tapes, instead of having interleaved data on them. Thanks & Cheers, -- José E. Molina ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
