[Bacula-users] Re: Disable upgrade of Incremental to Full?

2006-02-13 Thread Jens Boettge
Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > Is there any way to disable the auto-upgrade option of Incremental/ > Differential to Full or stipulate that an Incremental / Differential job > "failure" condition occurs when no Full backup exists (instead of > promotion)? Why do You want to do that? If You don't have

[Bacula-users] device load tracking in database?

2006-02-09 Thread Jens Boettge
Hello, only a short question for today. The database has a "device" table which should keep the usage of the backup devices. But there are no rows in this table. Is this feature not yet implemented or is this a bug? Possibly I have overlooked something? Best regards, Je

[Bacula-users] Re: client side backup exclude (feature request?)

2006-02-07 Thread Jens Boettge
up/ which you can exclude from your filesets. This requires some kind of discipline on the part of the users. I think, you already know the answer. ;-) > Erm, once again the short answer: Bacula can't do that, but feel free to > implement such an option :-) If I only had time..

[Bacula-users] Re: client side backup exclude (feature request?)

2006-02-07 Thread Jens Boettge
e enough users who are storing important files there. :-( And: to keep files in the trash/recycled is not unusual too. :-( >> The idea is to place a file (e.g. .nobackup) into the directory which >> is to be excluded. > > Isn't this on the todo list somwehere? That wo

[Bacula-users] Re: abysmal database write performance

2006-02-06 Thread Jens Boettge
- it'll come back to bite you. In general, I would definitly > not recommend running with fsync off, it's very dangerous (but then > I'm a database guy, so what else would you expect..). That is exactly my fear and that's why I don't want to disable fsync. Thanks