Re: [Bacula-users] Incremental backup, not accurate?

2006-11-15 Thread Jaap Stolk
On 11/15/06, Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > I read in the bacula docs that incremental backups use modification > times to decide if it or doesn't backup. For example and as it is said > in the doc, a "mv" on a directory doesn't change the modification time. > So, if I am not w

Re: [Bacula-users] differential backups not reqiered?

2006-11-10 Thread Jaap Stolk
On 11/10/06, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 03 November 2006 11:27, Jaap Stolk wrote: > > I did some more reading and found that the differential backup only > > looks at the file date/time, exactly like the incremental backup. so > > this is no r

Re: [Bacula-users] how to start over after test runs.

2006-11-06 Thread Jaap Stolk
On 11/6/06, Sarath Jayewardena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I guess different distributions make modifications to software to fit into > their philosophy. I faced the same problem when I started playing with > bacula on Debian (using sqlite). These were the steps that I took to > re-start f

Re: [Bacula-users] how to start over after test runs.

2006-11-05 Thread Jaap Stolk
On 11/6/06, Ger Apeldoorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The scripts are by default in the /etc/bacula directory AFAIK. thank you for your promt answer. there is no drop_mysql_tables anywhere on my system. (I installed using "apt-get" in debian) > If you really don't have them, you can drop the ent

[Bacula-users] how to start over after test runs.

2006-11-05 Thread Jaap Stolk
I would like to start over, but i don't seem to have the drop_mysql_tables / make_mysql_tables scripts. I do backup to file, so i don't need to rewind/EOF tapes (I already deleted the volume files) I couldn't find anything in the manual or on google (apart from instructions to use the above script

Re: [Bacula-users] differential backups not reqiered?

2006-11-03 Thread Jaap Stolk
On 11/3/06, Jaap Stolk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was wondering if i could do without the differential backups altogether ? (in reply to my own post) I did some more reading and found that the differential backup only looks at the file date/time, exactly like the incremental backup

[Bacula-users] differential backups not reqiered?

2006-11-03 Thread Jaap Stolk
i can see is that new files that are added with an old date/time will not be backed up. (like files extracted from an old zip file received by mail) Is there a way to make the incremental backup backup all new files, even if they have a date/time older than the previous incremental backup ?

Re: [Bacula-users] Can't mark files for restore in wx-console

2006-08-24 Thread Jaap Stolk
(replay to my own post) On 8/24/06, Jaap Stolk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I have Bacula 1.36.2 running on Debian, in a windows XP network. >I run the 1.38.10 windows client. > > Is it ok to run the windows client with a different version number ? I tried the 1.36.3 wx-cons

[Bacula-users] Can't mark files for restore in wx-console

2006-08-23 Thread Jaap Stolk
hi, I have Bacula 1.36.2 running on Debian, in a windows XP network. I run the 1.38.10 windows client, and making backups works great. I can restore files using bconsole on the Linux box. wx-console seems to work normally ("status all", etc works ok), and i can select a backup in the restore-tab o