Re: [Bacula-users] public key error trying to install bacula-client

2024-11-10 Thread Dragan Milivojević
There is a copr repo that has bacula packages for EL9 etc: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/slaanesh/Bacula/ On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 at 01:03, Rob Gerber wrote: > > EL9 / centos stream 9 / etc has deprecated use of SHA1 for package signing. > The bacula community key has not yet been updated.

Re: [Bacula-users] Strategies for backup of millions of files...

2024-10-16 Thread Dragan Milivojević
> You select only the Incremental job to restore, of course the data > is in one of the previous job. We can probably improve the error > message, or remove the meta-data-only record that is reported > as a file. > > I do not recommend to use the jobid= parameter in the restore > command line unles

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-15.x packages for Fedora (workstation)

2024-10-15 Thread Dragan Milivojević
RH is a bit conservative, especially when it comes to server software that is not that widely used. In this case it was a good decision since the latest Bacula breaks the backups if you use accurate mode with pino5 settings. Anyway you can use copr repositories for the latest version: copr.fedorain

Re: [Bacula-users] Strategies for backup of millions of files...

2024-09-27 Thread Dragan Milivojević
Search the mailing list for a thread that I started a few days ago. It breaks bacula by saving empty files, no metadata, only name is saved. On Fri, 27 Sept 2024, 10:28 Josip Deanovic via Bacula-users, < bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On 2024-09-26 17:01, Dragan Milivoje

Re: [Bacula-users] Strategies for backup of millions of files...

2024-09-26 Thread Dragan Milivojević
> For example, while browsing/restoring backup of the specific date, you > would > get the state of a backed up directory as it was during the execution of > a > selected backup job. > I would recommend the "accurate" option in this case. Be careful with the accurate option, if you use the recomme

Re: [Bacula-users] Remote Client Security Alerts

2024-09-17 Thread Dragan Milivojević
AFAIK there is no such feature on the FD side but I might be wrong. On Tue, 17 Sept 2024 at 13:52, Chris Wilkinson wrote: > > Is that something that can be done in the FD or is it a job for iptables? > > -Chris Wilkinson > > On Tue, 17 Sep 2024, 12:48 Dragan Milivojević, wrot

Re: [Bacula-users] Warning: Unexpected stream="0"

2024-09-07 Thread Dragan Milivojević
> I was planning to run the director and SD in debug mode also a bit > latter, will post the debug logs > if I'm able to trigger the issue. Update to this issue is stuck in moderation due to message size, so posting it again with links to files. bacula fd, dir and sd were run with -d 300 -v -m pa

Re: [Bacula-users] Warning: Unexpected stream="0"

2024-09-06 Thread Dragan Milivojević
On Fri, 6 Sept 2024 at 23:55, Martin Simmons wrote: > > Try running the bacula-fd with -d 300 to capture much more information when it > fails. I was planning to run the director and SD in debug mode also a bit latter, will post the debug logs if I'm able to trigger the issue. > Also, what is th

Re: [Bacula-users] Warning: Unexpected stream="0"

2024-09-06 Thread Dragan Milivojević
I can now confirm that the same issue is happening on a different backup server with Windows (Server 2022) client. It seems that the accurate backups are broken with this version of Bacula. On Fri, 6 Sept 2024 at 05:33, Dragan Milivojević wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Sept 2024 at 20:12,

[Bacula-users] Warning: Unexpected stream="0"

2024-09-05 Thread Dragan Milivojević
Hi all An issue with Bacula version 15.0.2, basically Bacula fails to save files, all that is stored is file names and no data, not even metadata. For example: *list jobid=81 +---++-+--+---+--+--+---+ | jobid | name | s