tz
> It would probably help get a response if you give some details about
> "this seems to work no longer".
>
> Why doesn't it work? What does it do? What is the exact output?
>
> On 02/24/2016 04:04 AM, Dietz Pröpper wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I ha
Hi,
I have a little problem:
I have an autochanger with two devices. In former times, after I issued a
"unmount storage=blah drive=0" the sd status for that device was displayed as
"BLOCKED by user", which should still be the case, according to the
documentation.
Since some months, this seems
Am Donnerstag, 3. Juli 2014, 16:58:22 schrieb antonio.mannatzu:
> - -bash-4.1$ psql bacula
> psql: FATAL: database "bacula" does not exist
> DETAIL: The database subdirectory "base/16386" is missing.
This looks like your database went corrupt. Not directly a bacula problem.
regards
Diet
Adrian Reyer:
> Make sure you have cache ram on your raid controller and a battery
> backup unit installed. MySQL and Postgres like to write in sync. With
> BBU+cache the write is completed as soon as the controller has the data,
> no need to wait for disks. I doubt RAID0 would gain you much if any
Dan Langille:
> On Dec 29, 2011, at 7:55 AM, ninyo wrote:
> > No. Im not working with barcodes
> > o_0'
>
> Is this because there is no barcode reader or because you don't want to
> use the one that is there?
He mailed the output of mtx status way up the thread, and it seems to me,
that he d
Mario Moder:
> Am 23.12.2011 12:07, schrieb Dietz Pröpper:
> > Now the question, is it possible to have the incremental jobs run with
> > data spooling on and the full ones with spooling off? As far as I can
> > see from the manual, I can not accomplish that by means of a S
Johnston, James C. (GRC-RXP0):
> I've got a large (~16 TB) file server that I want to back up onto a
> ~40TB RAID array connected to the fileserver via fiber channel (so
> there is no backup traffic on our network).
Ok, I've never done stuff at that size. Just as a warning to read on ;-).
> I ne
Hi,
the problem: I've got some backup job that does a full backup once a week
and differential ones every other day. The full backup streams with the
nominal data rate of the tape device, which is fine. But for incremental
jobs, the rate is normally far beyond that rate.
Now the question, is i
Quoting myself:
> Uwe Bolick:
> > It's really strange, because everything seems OK. If I do it by hand,
>
> > I get:
> Sorry, but you did not do it by hand ;-). And what I can see from the
> logs you mailed, it's the tape in slot 3 that gets rejected.
You did it by hand ;-) Had to read another ti
Uwe Bolick:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 07:58:09PM +0100, Dietz Pröpper wrote:
> > Uwe Bolick:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I needs to restore files from tape, but this time without success,
> > > because the needed tape can not be loaded for action. After l
Uwe Bolick:
> Hi,
>
> I needs to restore files from tape, but this time without success,
> because the needed tape can not be loaded for action. After loading
> the tape, it get's unloaded immediately:
[...]
What happens if you try to load the tape by hand, i.e. by means of a mtx
load 3, and try
Carsten Pache:
> >> A few days ago I had to restore some files. After the files were
> >> restored successfully, the VolStatus (shown by "list volumes") of the
> >> two tapes that were needed during restore changed from "Append" to
> >> "Used". Is this an expected behaviour?
> >
> > Do you hava a
Carsten Pache:
> A few days ago I had to restore some files. After the files were
> restored successfully, the VolStatus (shown by "list volumes") of the
> two tapes that were needed during restore changed from "Append" to
> "Used". Is this an expected behaviour?
Do you hava a maximum use time con
Fahrer, Julian:
> Hi,
>
> Am I missing something or is the "Volume Use Duration" parameter in the
> pool not working in 5.2.1?
[...]
>
> Mediaid 5 & 8 should actually be in status "used". It is 2011-11-24
> 17:00 right now...
> Same thing for other pools with "Volume Use Duration = 12 days"
>
>
Martin Simmons:
> > On Thu, 5 May 2011 09:18:45 +0200, Dietz =?utf-8?q?Pr=C3=B6pper?=
said:
> > And now the question - is there a way to accomplish the wished
> > behavior (tape gets set to "used" immediately after the usage
> > duration, not the next time the pool is touched) by some other me
Hi,
I use several pools for daily, weekly and monthly backups. To be able to
remove the tapes from the monthly backup without bacula trying to use the
left over place on the last tape from one month again the next month I have
defined a suitable Volume Use Duration:
Pool {
Name = Monthly
[..
Martin Simmons:
> >>>>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:29:33 +0200, Dietz Pröpper said:
> > To see wether the file system is indeed the bottleneck you could try
> > to tar the fs to /dev/null and compare the transfer rate to that of
> > your bacula backup.
>
> Go
Jason Voorhees:
> Well, these are my results of a bonnie++ test:
[...]
> Version 1.03e --Sequential Output-- --Sequential Input-
> --Random- -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
> MachineSize K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP
> /sec %CP
Jason Voorhees:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:01 PM, John Drescher
wrote:
> >> So do you believe these speeds of my backups are normal? I though my
> >> Library tape with LTO-5 tapes could write at 140 MB/s approx. It
> >> isn't possible to achieve higher speeds?
> >
> > You need to speed up your
Hi,
is there a possibility to attach files (i.e. bsr files) to
backup status mails?
At the moment, I use a post backup job to mail these, but it
would be nice if I could attach them directly to "Backup
successful" mails.
regards,
Dietz
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally si
Laxansh K. Adesara:
> I have installed bacula-dir on ubuntu and bacula-client on window
> machine and also configured it so I am able to connect bacula-dir from
> bacula client machine form console and now I want to do backup by using
> LTO 4 tape drive which is installed on window 2003 server and
Hi,
(if that has been already asked, sorry, feel free to provide a pointer...)
that weekend I found time to upgrade a 2.4.2 bacula zu 5.0.3.
Apart from an exploding mysql on restore, everything worked fine.
But now I'm trying to look into accurate backups and feel confused ;-).
To put it straigh
You:
> On Aug 13, 2010, at 2:23 PM, Dietz Pröpper wrote:
> > You:
> >> On Aug 13, 2010, at 4:10 AM, Dietz Pröpper wrote:
> >>> IMHO there are two problems with hardware compression:
> >>> 1. Data mix: The compression algorithms tend to work quite well o
Phil Stracchino:
> On 08/14/10 09:34, Dietz Pröpper wrote:
> > Peter Zenge:
> >> Remember also that if you are trying to minimize tape/disk/other
> >> backup media space used, and using encryption, you will need to use
> >> software compression. The F
James Harper:
> > Hi at all,
> >
> > I got a trouble: a server of our server farm runs some perl scripts
>
> that
>
> > are bad influenced by Bacula backup.
> > Until our developers will return from holiday (damn), I need to limit
> > bacula speed.
> > Our servers are connected by 100Mbps ethe
Peter Zenge:
> Remember also that if you are trying to minimize tape/disk/other backup
> media space used, and using encryption, you will need to use software
> compression. The FD compresses before encrypting; once encrypted, as
> noted above, the data is no longer compressible...
Ack, that was
Phil Stracchino:
> Neither of these issues is applicable to LTO. The compression algorithm
> (which is a pretty good one) is defined in the LTO specification, and
> the drive compresses data block-by-block, doing a trial compression of
> each data block and writing whichever is the smaller of the
You:
> On Aug 13, 2010, at 4:10 AM, Dietz Pröpper wrote:
> > IMHO there are two problems with hardware compression:
> > 1. Data mix: The compression algorithms tend to work quite well on
> > compressable stuff, but can't cope very well with precompressed stuff,
> &
John Drescher:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Dietz Pröpper
wrote:
> > John Drescher:
> >> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Mike Hanby wrote:
> >> > Howdy,
> >> >
> >> > I'm curious whether others with the PV-124T
John Drescher:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Mike Hanby wrote:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > I'm curious whether others with the PV-124T with LTO4 are using
> > hardware or software compression.
> >
> > I am testing a new Bacula deployment with one of these autoloaders /
> > drives and haven't found a
Rory Campbell-Lange:
> On 12/08/10, Mike Hanby (mha...@uab.edu) wrote:
> > I'm curious whether others with the PV-124T with LTO4 are using
> > hardware or software compression.
> >
> > I am testing a new Bacula deployment with one of these autoloaders /
> > drives and haven't found a good suggesti
Derek Harkness:
> I'm getting the following error between one of my clients and the
> storage server. All my other clients have been able to backup just
> fine to this storage device but this one client always returns the
> Connection reset by peer.
>
> I've adjusted the heartbeat and the keepali
Oddbjørn Sjøgren:
> # mtx status
> mtx: Request Sense: Long Report=yes
> mtx: Request Sense: Valid Residual=no
> mtx: Request Sense: Error Code=70 (Current)
> mtx: Request Sense: Sense Key=Unit Attention
> mtx: Request Sense: FileMark=no
> mtx: Request Sense: EOM=no
> mtx: Request Sense: ILI=no
> m
33 matches
Mail list logo
