Re: [Bacula-users] MariaDB or Oracle's MySQL.

2013-07-08 Thread Carsten Jensen
On 07/08/2013 06:15 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote: > I have been using Oracle's mysql several years and one of the worst > problem with it has been restore times, especially the time it takes to > generate the file selection tree. When fedora 19 became available and > with the information that they suppo

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO5 performance

2013-04-12 Thread Carsten Jensen
On 04/12/2013 02:21 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi guys, I come back with something with I've found, the server where the SD resides has 2 jobs. One runs really slow, it backus mainly small files, while another one on the same machine with bigger files runs at rates around 20 times faster! Could

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO5 performance

2013-03-14 Thread Carsten Jensen
On 03/14/2013 08:32 PM, John Drescher wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> The performance is very poor, its around 6MB/s !!! >> The tape device is an IBM ULT3580-HH5 >> >> Host: scsi3 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00 >>Vendor: IBM Model: ULT3580-HH5

Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot start bacula-fd on Windows XP Professional

2013-01-08 Thread Carsten Jensen
On 01/08/2013 04:20 PM, Luca Bertoncello wrote: > Hi, list! > > I need to backup a machine with Windows XP Professional. > I installed Bacula and I configured it, such as a Linux machine. > > Unfortunately, I cannot start the FD... > If I start it from console I don't get any message, but the ser

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup is way too slow

2012-10-26 Thread Carsten Jensen
On 10/26/2012 08:56 AM, Paul Van Wambeke wrote: > > Hi > > I had very slow backup times with a Ubuntu server 10.04 running the > Bacula director, 5.01 and handling a Windows 2008 R2 server with > Bacula-fd 5.2. I discovered that the throughput of the ethernet adapter > (broadcom) in the Windo

Re: [Bacula-users] no more appenable volumes -- what's the preferred way to handle this

2012-10-26 Thread Carsten Jensen
On 10/26/2012 04:04 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > 08.10.2012 10:31, mayak-cq kirjoitti: >> hi all, >> >> i have a bacula instance that's been running fine for a long while ... >> >> i was able to tweak the volume retention to keep a maximum number of >> backups available, until, a user saved a giga

Re: [Bacula-users] Full backup every day

2012-10-24 Thread Carsten Jensen
Yes you can. I suggest you take a look in the manual or the sample files they are pretty well documented so you can set it up for your needs. On 10/24/2012 01:18 PM, warley wrote: > Hello everybody, > > How can I do a full backup every day? Monday to Friday. > It would be a pool with 5 tapes? >

Re: [Bacula-users] Tweak SCSI negotiation settings

2012-10-18 Thread Carsten Jensen
Sorry for answering again, accidently hit send while not finished to compare an LTO4 drive with an Ultra320 controller I get around 55MB/sec my guess is that the LTO3 drive should deliver around 30-40MB/sec with the right controller (ultra320). (pay note to that there usually are 2 models, a fast

Re: [Bacula-users] Tweak SCSI negotiation settings

2012-10-18 Thread Carsten Jensen
an Adaptec 2940 is usually only a SCSI-II device with 10MB/Sec the 2940UW performs 40MB/sec these are maximum bus transfers If you haven't made any special modifications to the driver/kernel, then linux uses the fastest speed possible delivered by the restrictions of the host adapter. going ali

Re: [Bacula-users] Disaster Recovery Test

2012-09-25 Thread Carsten Jensen
On 2012-09-25 16:58, dweimer wrote: > Now that I have been running Bacula for several months, I was working > on testing disaster recovery, just in case I need to. I am a little > lost though on what I need to do to get the database restored. I am > going on the assumption that All I will have