On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 at 22:18, Jose Alberto wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Debian 12
>
> Bacularis after updating it to 4.0.0 is too slow. Also note that if DNS
> fails, it works even slower.
Hi Jose,
Thanks for your feedback.
Yes, slow or failing DNS can kill every application performance that
uses netw
Thanks, however this doesn’t really explain what I was asking for.
The Copy Job seems to reference to the Backup Job volumes, not to the Copy Job
volumes, whereas the Copy Control Jo references to the Copy Job volumes.
When the Backup Job gets expired, and the Copy Control Job gets expired this
Hi.
I Have bacula.
I was presented with a vmware disk LUN. with vmfs-fuse you can mount it in
read mode in Bacula. And then from there copy the content (the entire
*.vmdk file)
Is it good practice?
I haven't tried the restorations. I try and tell you.
--
#
# S
Hi.
Debian 12
Bacularis after updating it to 4.0.0 is too slow. Also note that if DNS
fails, it works even slower.
--
#
# Sistema Operativo: Debian #
#Caracas, Venezuela #
#
__
On 11/20/24 9:59 AM, D. wrote:
I upgraded from 13.0.4 to 15.0.2 on two Oracle Linux 8.10 servers. In
both cases, the bacula-sd.service daemon won't start after the upgrade.
The DIR and FD daemons start just fine. The DIR seems to interact with
the upgraded database just fine.
The lack of loggi
Hello Justin,
It's more simple than you think.
When Bacula prunes a Backup job which has a copy of itself, it promotes the
Copy to a Backup job as you know.
But, all that happens is the 'jobtype' field in the Job table for this Copy Job is changed from a 'C' to a 'B', and so then
it is now
On Wednesday, November 20, 2024 5:59:45 PM CET D. wrote:
> I upgraded from 13.0.4 to 15.0.2 on two Oracle Linux 8.10 servers. In
> both cases, the bacula-sd.service daemon won't start after the upgrade.
> The DIR and FD daemons start just fine. The DIR seems to interact with
> the upgraded databa
I upgraded from 13.0.4 to 15.0.2 on two Oracle Linux 8.10 servers. In
both cases, the bacula-sd.service daemon won't start after the upgrade.
The DIR and FD daemons start just fine. The DIR seems to interact with
the upgraded database just fine.
The lack of logging has me stumped as to how I
Maybe some of the people with deeper insight into the inner working of Bacula
can help me understand a certain topic.
I recently came across the mechanism of that when the a job of type “Backup”
has been pruned by the director, it also upgrades the corresponding job of type
“Copy” to a job of t
On 11/19/24 17:18, Josh Fisher via Bacula-users wrote:
Hello.
Are you sure they are powering down?
Yes.
I've asked the users and they confirm they power them down when they are
finished with their task.
there is no
way to deal with the user physically powering down the machine, other
t
On 2024-11-20 10:15, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
On 11/19/24 17:18, Josh Fisher via Bacula-users wrote:
[...]
If you are trying to deal with laptops that users take in and out of
the office, then look into the "Reschedule On Error" directive for the
Job
I'm already doing this: sooner or later re
Thanks Eric
I will look into a more felxible disk solution for server
Regards /Mehrdad
On 2024-11-19 10:11, Eric Bollengier wrote:
Hello Mehrdad,
On 11/19/24 09:30, Mehrdad Ravanbod wrote:
Hi Guys
I am setting up a straight forward Bacula installation, straight
backup to disk and the size
12 matches
Mail list logo
