Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula for QNAP?

2022-01-03 Thread Gary R. Schmidt
On 04/01/2022 05:47, David Brodbeck wrote: [SNIP] I found bacula-sd and NFS were not a very happy combination. It was very quick to react to network glitches by marking the entire volume as failed, then trying and failing several more volumes before things finally got moving again. I was cons

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula for QNAP?

2022-01-03 Thread Heitor Faria
> I did consider completely wiping the thing and installing either Gentoo > Linux or Solaris x86. But I hesitate to do that on a brand new unit > still under warranty. "Warranty does not apply, if the warranty period is expired, the warranty label is broken or removed, the serial number label i

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula for QNAP?

2022-01-03 Thread David Brodbeck
On Sun, Jan 2, 2022 at 7:09 AM Heitor Faria wrote: > Hello Phil, > > > (a) trying to figure out how to get a Bacula sd and fd installed on it > > The happiest days of my life were after I got dedicated equipment for home > network modem, routing, and wireless mesh accessing points. > That said, I

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula for QNAP?

2022-01-03 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 1/3/22 07:56, Heitor Faria wrote: These providers do that because they think it would be very hard or even impossible to give support to a NAS with an OS that the user can freely modify. Therefore, you could try TrueNAS , which is based on FreeBSD, or build your own

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet size too big (NOT a version mismatch)

2022-01-03 Thread David Brodbeck
I'm curious if anyone has moved away from Bacula on macOS and what alternatives they're using. Even before this, it was getting more and more awkward to set up -- bacula really doesn't play well with SIP, for example, and running "csrutil disable" on every system is not a security best practice. O

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula for QNAP?

2022-01-03 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 1/3/22 14:55, Dmitri Maziuk wrote: True (formerly known as Free) NAS is FreeBSD, I know. it's just everything you need for the NAS conveniently pre-packaged, and comes with a web GUI. That's the reason I would prefer plain FreeBSD: no GUI at all; just use SSH (which is what I do on N

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula for QNAP?

2022-01-03 Thread Dmitri Maziuk
On 1/3/2022 7:23 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote: On 1/3/22 13:56, Heitor Faria wrote: Therefore, you could try TrueNAS , which is based on FreeBSD Then I'd use FreeBSD directly, as I do for servers :) True (formerly known as Free) NAS is FreeBSD, it's just everything

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula for QNAP?

2022-01-03 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 1/3/22 13:56, Heitor Faria wrote: Therefore, you could try TrueNAS , which is based on FreeBSD Then I'd use FreeBSD directly, as I do for servers :) bye & Thanks av. ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-use

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula for QNAP?

2022-01-03 Thread Heitor Faria
>> (I note that the ENTIRE REASON this problem arises in the first place is >> because QNAP sees fit to ship the device with a fully ...  well, MOSTLY >> functional Linux OS *with no system compiler installed*.) > > So do all the other brands I ever saw :( > > If you know a NAS (not as expensive

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula for QNAP?

2022-01-03 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 1/2/22 21:42, Phil Stracchino wrote: (I note that the ENTIRE REASON this problem arises in the first place is because QNAP sees fit to ship the device with a fully ...  well, MOSTLY functional Linux OS *with no system compiler installed*.) So do all the other brands I ever saw :( If you