On 6/3/19 10:40 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Any suggestions? Short of rolling back to 9.4.2?
So, I rolled back to 9.4.2. Smooth tape change, no catatonic SD, no
Director crash, and 9.4.2 wrote 812GB to the tape that 9.4.4 declared
full at 352GB.
--
Phil Stracchino
Babylon Communications
I always check manager/perfmonance, and when it is in the middle of bacula
job, I noticed bacula-fd.exe process is missing from windows Resource
Monitor > Network and Disk , and bacual-fd.exe cpu usgae 0 but Memory usage
49,744 K .
any thought?
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 1:57 PM Dimitri Maziuk via Bac
On 6/3/19 2:06 PM, ce wrote:
> running multiple jobs for the same client at the same time makes it
> worse...!!!
I use neither encryption nor windows, but this hints at disk i/o. I'm
sure sysinternals have some iostat equivalent, or you maybe you could
try watching it in task manager/perfmon?
--
Does any one else have issue with bacula speed with bacula 9.4.2.
is that normal that bacula speed is too low when encryption is enabled for
windows client and Windows Network IO is around xx kb/s or less with 1 Gbps
bandwidth ???
No cpu and memory issue on the client/server sides though.
P.S.
ru
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 8:29 AM Sebastian Suchanek
wrote:
> > I'm sure the tape is fine, the problem is that when we have power
> outages
> > during a backup my network goes down and then Bacula gets confused.
> >
> > I have UPS on bacula-dir machine and tape drive controller and tape
> drive,
> >
Am 03.06.2019 um 12:15 schrieb Ian Douglas:
> On Monday, 03 June 2019 11:44:34 SAST Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>
>> It's by design. The "Error" state for a tape means it's defective and should
>> not be used anymore. If you want Bacula to use it again (and i you are sure
>> what you are doing) you have
I'm not sure exactly what is causing it, but ...
My schedule does nightly incrementals, weekly differentials, and Fulls
on the first Monday morning of every month. For the second month in a
row - last month with 9.4.3, this month with 9.4.4 - at the first tape
volume switch in the monthly full ba
Kern,
Actually, no. I have three separate SDs, with their own Device entry in
the bacula-dir.conf, running on separate hosts, etc. Of those, two are
the ones in question, and other than the name, they're identical. I
only included one example, but there are two like that, other than the name.
> On Fri, 31 May 2019 11:38:55 -0600, Lloyd Brown said:
>
> On 5/31/19 10:46 AM, Martin Simmons wrote:
> >
> > The "waiting on max Storage jobs" is caused by the Maximum Concurrent Jobs
> > in
> > the Storage section of bacula-dir.conf.
> >
> > It would be useful to see the output of "show st
> On Mon, 03 Jun 2019 08:38:46 +0200, Ian Douglas said:
>
> hi
>
> My other message re error tapes refers, here's the bconsole session for
> labelling the new one, as far as I know it was a brand new tape, so am
> wondering if the error message below is a program bug.
>
> It first says it
> On Mon, 03 Jun 2019 12:15:22 +0200, Ian Douglas said:
>
> On Monday, 03 June 2019 11:44:34 SAST Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>
> > It's by design. The "Error" state for a tape means it's defective and should
> > not be used anymore. If you want Bacula to use it again (and i you are sure
> > what y
On Monday, 03 June 2019 11:44:34 SAST Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> It's by design. The "Error" state for a tape means it's defective and should
> not be used anymore. If you want Bacula to use it again (and i you are sure
> what you are doing) you have to change its state manually from "Error" to
> som
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019, at 09:24, Ian Douglas wrote:
> See attached, I was expecting Bacula to reuse this tape this morning, but
> instead it demanded a new one.
>
> Why would that be?
It's by design. The "Error" state for a tape means it's defective and should
not be used anymore.
If you want Bac
hi all
I suspect this has been asked before but can't find the answer ... maybe using
the wrong words on Google.
See attached, I was expecting Bacula to reuse this tape this morning, but
instead it demanded a new one.
Why would that be?
I tried to find the procedure for dealing with "error" t
hi
My other message re error tapes refers, here's the bconsole session for
labelling the new one, as far as I know it was a brand new tape, so am
wondering if the error message below is a program bug.
It first says it is unlabelled and then says it was pre-labelled. ??
15 matches
Mail list logo
