Re: [Bacula-users] restore raid array

2018-12-12 Thread Jerry Lowry
Thank you Kern and fellow Bacula users, I had a suspicion that was the case, but thought I would ask. I appreciate the help and commend the community for its endeavors to work with other users. thank you again, jerry On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 12:25 AM Kern Sibbald wrote: > Hello, > > Bacula has

Re: [Bacula-users] [External] Re: "Full" tapes with zero bytes?

2018-12-12 Thread mark . bergman
In the message dated: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 13:40:04 +, The pithy ruminations from Martin Simmons on [[External] Re: [Bacula-users] "Full" tapes with zero bytes?] were: => > On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:02:19 -0500, mark bergman said: => > => > I'm running Bacula 9.0.8 under CentOS 6, and I'm seeing

Re: [Bacula-users] "Full" tapes with zero bytes?

2018-12-12 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:02:19 -0500, mark bergman said: > > I'm running Bacula 9.0.8 under CentOS 6, and I'm seeing something odd with > some tapes. Backups were written to the tapes, but a query of the status of > volumes in the tape changer shows that the media is > "Full" with zero GB: >

Re: [Bacula-users] restore raid array

2018-12-12 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Bacula has no way to reconstruct the data in an original backup Volume.  If you lose the Volume, it is gone.  About the only mitigating factors after you delete the original volumes are: as is your case, switch to using the Copy volume in place of the original