Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula version 7 Server errors backing up Bacula 9 client

2018-05-02 Thread Gary R. Schmidt
On 02/05/2018 10:07, Matt Weatherford wrote: Dear Bacula community, Would like to request advice with an issue - we are having trouble with our first Debian 10 (testing) bacula client Backup Server is Debian 9 Linux, packages are: server# apt-show-versions | grep bacula bacula-bscan:amd64/s

Re: [Bacula-users] Packet Size too big from client

2018-05-02 Thread Bill Arlofski
On 05/01/2018 04:58 PM, Alan Li wrote: > Hello Bacula Users: > > We have a Bacula backup server on a Debian 9 machine with both bacula-director > and bacula-fd version 7.4.4. It backs up other Debian hosts that have > bacula-fd version 7.4.4 just fine. Today we bring up another Debian host that >

[Bacula-users] Packet Size too big from client

2018-05-02 Thread Alan Li
Hello Bacula Users: We have a Bacula backup server on a Debian 9 machine with both bacula-director and bacula-fd version 7.4.4. It backs up other Debian hosts that have bacula-fd version 7.4.4 just fine. Today we bring up another Debian host that runs bacula-fd version 9.0.7 and when we try to

[Bacula-users] Bacula version 7 Server errors backing up Bacula 9 client

2018-05-02 Thread Matt Weatherford
Dear Bacula community, Would like to request advice with an issue - we are having trouble with our first Debian 10 (testing) bacula client Backup Server is Debian 9 Linux, packages are: server# apt-show-versions | grep bacula bacula-bscan:amd64/stretch 7.4.4+dfsg-6 uptodate bacula-common:amd

Re: [Bacula-users] Not a Bacula labeled Volume error

2018-05-02 Thread Clark, Patti
If you just want another volume to be selected, mark the volume "Full" or "Error". Either setting will get Bacula to look for another volume. It will give you time to decide on what you want to do with the problem volume while Bacula continues with the backup. Patti On 5/1/18, 11:33 AM, "

Re: [Bacula-users] Not a Bacula labeled Volume error

2018-05-02 Thread Shawn Rappaport
Update #2: So, it seems I have an even bigger problem. I tried to manually back up the servers that failed using our weekly pool instead of the daily pool and they failed with the same error: 01-May 08:40 bacmedia01-mn.internal.shutterfly.com-sd JobId 4697: Fatal error: block_util.c:425 Volume d

Re: [Bacula-users] Incorrect datetime value after Bionic Update

2018-05-02 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 04/30/18 09:43, Ken Mandelberg wrote: > I did a Ubuntu update from 16.04 to 18.04. The automatic Bacula update > as part of the OS upgrade partially failed. > > After the upgrade I found myself with > > bacula-dir JobId 0: Fatal error: Version error for database "bacula". > Wanted 16, got 14

[Bacula-users] KnowHow Remote Backup Administration Outsourcing

2018-05-02 Thread Heitor Faria
Hello All, Sorry for the grey off-topic, but I was pretty impressed by this company in Uruguay that remotely outsources backup administration and works with several backup software, including Community and Enterprise Bacula .

Re: [Bacula-users] scheduled job different that manually initiated job? --WAS: Re: Backup problem with 1 of 2 Raspberry PI using Raspbian (Debian)

2018-05-02 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Tue, 1 May 2018 20:46:42 +0200, Thorsten Johannsen said: > > On 01.05.2018 19:09, Martin Simmons wrote: > >> On Tue, 1 May 2018 17:16:10 +0200, Thorsten Johannsen said: > >> > >> On 30.04.2018 16:35, Martin Simmons wrote: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2018 14:18:03 +0200, Thorsten Johanns