Re: [Bacula-users] libbaccats-9.0.6.so dependency problem when installing rpm files

2018-04-05 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On 04/05/2018 11:50 AM, Donna Hofmeister wrote: [systemd] > Unfortunately, it's something we'll have to get used to. At least for bacula-sd with ZFS storage, FreeBSD is looking better and better every day. -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.e

Re: [Bacula-users] libbaccats-9.0.6.so dependency problem when installing rpm files

2018-04-05 Thread Donna Hofmeister
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > > FWIW I'm deploying more, or at least as many, new centos 6 installs, than > centos 7 ones. I've come to the conclusion that between systemd with its > service files and mount units and stuff, breaking kernel ABI on every point > release,

Re: [Bacula-users] libbaccats-9.0.6.so dependency problem when installing rpm files

2018-04-05 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On 2018-04-05 10:25, Donna Hofmeister wrote: Just to continue sniveling...I downloaded the *source* for bacula 7.4.7. While it compiled ok (I did have to install libacl-devel first), I'm pulling my hair out trying to get the service files created . FWIW I'm deploying more, or at least a

Re: [Bacula-users] libbaccats-9.0.6.so dependency problem when installing rpm files

2018-04-05 Thread Donna Hofmeister
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Matthias Leopold < matthias.leop...@meduniwien.ac.at> wrote: > > I'm absolutely new to Bacula and basically only want to package the > software for CentOS 7 so it can be used in my organization by others. I'm > compiling RPMs from the spec files in bacula-9.0.6.tar.

[Bacula-users] libbaccats-9.0.6.so dependency problem when installing rpm files

2018-04-05 Thread Matthias Leopold
Hi, I'm absolutely new to Bacula and basically only want to package the software for CentOS 7 so it can be used in my organization by others. I'm compiling RPMs from the spec files in bacula-9.0.6.tar.gz. I chose "%define postgresql 1" so i got a bacula-postgresql-9.0.6-1.x86_64.rpm package.

Re: [Bacula-users] aix binary?

2018-04-05 Thread Mike Eggleston
Kern, I’m still working on building AIX FD binaries. Do you know when you were building by hand, or now on the automated system, is gcc used or the native IBM/AIX compiler (xlC)? Thanks, Mike From: Kern Sibbald [mailto:k...@sibbald.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 1:34 PM To: Mike Eggleston

Re: [Bacula-users] aix binary?

2018-04-05 Thread Mike Eggleston
Kern, Sorry, another question as I try to build the AIX binary FD… Do you know which compiler is on your AIX build? (gcc or AIX/IBM native xlC?) Thanks, Mike From: Kern Sibbald [mailto:k...@sibbald.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 1:34 PM To: Mike Eggleston ; Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.n

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup problem with 1 of 2 Raspberry PI using Raspbian (Debian)

2018-04-05 Thread Johannsen, Thorsten
On 05.04.2018 13:35, Johannsen, Thorsten wrote: On 05.04.2018 00:01, Jari Fredriksson wrote: Hi Jari, [...] Do you have Raspbian installed? Do you use the bacula-fd version from the repository or did you compile your own? Moreover: could you please check the free memory on your 5 RPI's?

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup problem with 1 of 2 Raspberry PI using Raspbian (Debian)

2018-04-05 Thread Johannsen, Thorsten
On 05.04.2018 00:01, Jari Fredriksson wrote: Hi Jari, [...] One of the Raspi's (heRPI01) is being backed up without any problems. The other one (heRPI02), however, refused to make backups after a first and successful backup: I have 5 Raspis, all backed up with Bacula, all having accurate

[Bacula-users] Fwd: Re: Backup problem with 1 of 2 Raspberry PI using Raspbian (Debian)

2018-04-05 Thread Johannsen, Thorsten
... sorry, sent the reply as PM by accident :) Forwarded Message Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Backup problem with 1 of 2 Raspberry PI using Raspbian (Debian) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 15:32:28 +0200 From: Thorsten Johannsen To: Josh Fisher On 04.04.2018 13:37, Josh Fisher wrote