On 05/15/2017 08:35 AM, Thomas Franz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> in our opinion it is the best way to have one storage daemon for each
> storage device (more stable if one device ist lost etc.)
> Our configuration ( see below) works, but I have a problem with bconsole.
> In this configuration the status co
Hello,
Unfortunately, Webacula hasn't been maintained since several years.
I would have a look at baculum or Bacula-web (reporting only)
Good luck
Davide
On Tue, 9 May 2017 at 12:50, Iban Cabrillo wrote:
> Hi,
> I do not know if this is the correct forum to ask, but I just migrate
> from b
> On May 15, 2017, at 9:46 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
>
> After I've dealt with this (and possibly run the root tests too): how do I
> report?
> Is the submission engine still missing?
> Is a mail like this expected?
> Other means?
I think you want the devel/cmake port, which contains ctest.
Hello,
in our opinion it is the best way to have one storage daemon for each
storage device (more stable if one device ist lost etc.)
Our configuration ( see below) works, but I have a problem with bconsole.
In this configuration the status command of bconsole only shows the
first storage !!!
Th
On 05/11/17 13:43, Dan Langille wrote:
>> Right now I'm at 3 tests failing, but I will investigate these too ASAP.
>
> Please persist.
So, I'm up to the point where I completed all the non root disk tests
and here's the results (FreeBSD 10.3/amd64 jail with SQLite3):
> Start non-root disk test
