Hello Phil,
Please see below ...
On 01/15/2017 03:25 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 01/14/17 16:36, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> Hello Phil,
>>
>> Someone apparently someone submitted the following comment to a bug report:
>>
>>
>> Currently, a scratch pool is uses as any other pool. In particula
On 01/14/17 16:36, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello Phil,
>
> Someone apparently someone submitted the following comment to a bug report:
>
>
> Currently, a scratch pool is uses as any other pool. In particula, it is
> possible to use a scratch pool as a target for backups. The result may
> be
Hello Phil,
Someone apparently someone submitted the following comment to a bug report:
Currently, a scratch pool is uses as any other pool. In particula, it is
possible to use a scratch pool as a target for backups. The result may
be quite unexpected and annoying.
One solution would be t
On 01/14/17 13:49, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 01/14/17 13:19, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> Does anyone have the slightest idea what's going on here, or why Bacula
>> suddenly cares about the scratch pool which it isn't even using for this
>> job, but is perfectly happy to recycle expired disk volumes
On 01/14/17 13:19, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Does anyone have the slightest idea what's going on here, or why Bacula
> suddenly cares about the scratch pool which it isn't even using for this
> job, but is perfectly happy to recycle expired disk volumes into?
Oh, and it's also perfectly happy to de
I have a problem. I need to restore a single directory of files. I
have the required tape volume mounted, I set up the job, no problem,
until I exit file selection.
Then suddenly, bacula (7.4.4) tells me:
1,179 files selected to be restored.
Pool "Scratch" not valid.
Job not run.
*
...Wait,
