Re: [Bacula-users] Use Copy Incremental Job as Weekly Job

2015-09-22 Thread Ana Emília M . Arruda
You're welcome :). I'm sorry I made a mistake with the directive for the volume retention period in the Pool definition. The bellow is correct: Pool { Name = OriginalPool Pool Type = Backup Volume Retention = 7 days ... Next Pool = DestinationPool } Pool { Name = DestinationPoo

Re: [Bacula-users] Use Copy Incremental Job as Weekly Job

2015-09-22 Thread Carlo Filippetto
Thank you very mutch ^_^ Il 22/set/2015 18:50, "Ana Emília M. Arruda" ha scritto: > Hello Carlo, > > Yes. You can have a "Next Pool" directive configured for being used by > your copy job. This way, you can configure the pool for 30 days retention: > > Job { >Name = OriginalJob >Type = B

Re: [Bacula-users] Issue with second writing to tape

2015-09-22 Thread Ana Emília M . Arruda
Hello, The recommendation for Bacula versions are: director = storage daemon >= file daemon It seems you have your director and storage daemon running 5.2.5 version and client running 5.2.10. Also, is your system 32 or 64 bits? Best regards, Ana On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Radosław Korzen

Re: [Bacula-users] Use Copy Incremental Job as Weekly Job

2015-09-22 Thread Ana Emília M . Arruda
Hello Carlo, Yes. You can have a "Next Pool" directive configured for being used by your copy job. This way, you can configure the pool for 30 days retention: Job { Name = OriginalJob Type = Backup ... Pool = OriginalPool } Pool { Name = OriginalPool Pool Type = Backup Reten

Re: [Bacula-users] New volumes for each backup

2015-09-22 Thread Ana Emília M . Arruda
Hi Wagar, This is occuring because you have "Recycle = yes" configured in your Pool. This way, when bacula needs a volume, it will try to find one that had passed the retention period (in your case, 8 days). This is not a "volume name reuse", but a "volume reuse" because of your configurations. I

Re: [Bacula-users] Failed to compile Bacula 7.2 (from git) in Debian 8.2 with Kernel 4.2

2015-09-22 Thread Eric Bollengier
Hello, It looks to be an issue with the AFS code, I pushed a fix in the git repository (Branch-7.2), I would appreciate your feedback. Thanks, Best Regards Eric On 09/22/2015 02:15 PM, Wanderlei Huttel wrote: > I'm running Debian GNU/Linux 8.2 (jessie) with Kernel Linux 4.2.0 and I > can't comp

Re: [Bacula-users] New volumes for each backup

2015-09-22 Thread Борис Березовский
Hi, Waqar. Logic of bacula work with hdd is emulate tape, so every you volume is a virtual tape. Situation, what you offering is that you use new virtual tape every time, that previous tape are full. So after mean while you have are very box with volumes (tapes) :) I'm not specialist in Bacula

[Bacula-users] New volumes for each backup

2015-09-22 Thread Waqar Khan
Hi all. Bacula version: 5.0.0 I asked this question yesterday and have been reading the docs to find a solution but have not been able to do so. I only do file volume backups (no tapes) and I copy all the volumes to a remote location. In order to sync them I look at the volume names and decide

[Bacula-users] Failed to compile Bacula 7.2 (from git) in Debian 8.2 with Kernel 4.2

2015-09-22 Thread Wanderlei Huttel
I'm running Debian GNU/Linux 8.2 (jessie) with Kernel Linux 4.2.0 and I can't compile bacula in it. Configuration on Tue Sep 22 07:52:30 BRT 2015: Host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -- debian 8.2 Bacula version: Bacula 7.2.0 (14 August 2015) Source code locatio

[Bacula-users] Failed to compile Bacula 7.2 (from git) in Debian 8.2 with Kernel 4.2

2015-09-22 Thread Wanderlei Huttel
I'm running Debian GNU/Linux 8.2 (jessie) with Kernel Linux 4.2.0 and I can't compile bacula in it. Configuration on Tue Sep 22 07:52:30 BRT 2015: Host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -- debian 8.2 Bacula version: Bacula 7.2.0 (14 August 2015) Source code locatio

Re: [Bacula-users] Use Copy Incremental Job as Weekly Job

2015-09-22 Thread Carlo Filippetto
Hi, Noone have idea if the copy job can have a retention bigger that the original volumes? I have to modify it from "Update" command in bconsole? Thank you 2015-09-21 16:33 GMT+02:00 Carlo Filippetto : > Hi all > > I would like to modify my backup strategy: it is possible to use Copy Job > as