[Bacula-users] Ubuntu 14.04 (was Re: Bacula for OSX 10.9)

2014-09-11 Thread Richard Mortimer
Hi, I'm coming late to this thread but... On 07/09/2014 10:42, Kern Sibbald wrote: > On 09/07/2014 07:33 AM, Eric Dannewitz wrote: >> I'm interested in perhaps deploying this in my k-8 school, but I have not >> found a good tutorial of how to install it. Or if it even works right on Mac. >> >> A

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula writing in wrong volumes

2014-09-11 Thread Gean Michel Ceretta
Dear Kern, Em Ter, 2014-09-09 às 17:21 +0200, Kern Sibbald escreveu: > ...If you want to clearly separate Volume by clients, jobs, or by > some other criteria, you probably should be using different Pools. > Different pools are the most reliable way to ensure that only > particular jobs, clients

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Restore from dead client

2014-09-11 Thread Kern Sibbald
On 09/10/2014 02:58 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: >> On Tue, 09 Sep 2014 20:25:18 +0200, Kern Sibbald said: >> On 09/09/2014 07:46 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: >>> It looks like removing readfifo=yes will not help, because the restore code >>> doesn't look at it. >>> >>> The restore will not work with

Re: [Bacula-users] Is bacula able to handle customers?

2014-09-11 Thread Heitor Faria
Andre, You could use Webacula ACL (roles) in order to specify what clients your user can access, or even Bacula Consoles ACL. Regards, On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Solid Cloud Systems < i...@solid-cloud-systems.com> wrote: > Hello. > > Is it possible to give some customers access to one bac

[Bacula-users] Is bacula able to handle customers?

2014-09-11 Thread Solid Cloud Systems
Hello. Is it possible to give some customers access to one bacula environment without "sharing" their backups, or is it a "single user sollution"? Thanks for your help. -- Andre Klocke Inhaber Solid Cloud Systems Otto Hahn Str. 7 40764 Langenfeld Telefon: +49 2173 16 37 407 E-Mail: i...@solid

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger: yes or no?

2014-09-11 Thread Roberts, Ben
Hi Florian, >> Is using one Device Resource in the Storage daemon enough or is there any >> use for an autochanger in this case? > We do the same thing as this and have a single device resource with no > autochanger. Both options have their merits and drawbacks, so you should assess which would

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger: yes or no?

2014-09-11 Thread Simon Tann
We do the same thing as this and have a single device resource with no autochanger. Config is as follows: Device { Name = bacula_backups Media Type = File Archive Device = /opt/bacula/backups LabelMedia = yes; # lets Bacula label unlabeled media Random Access = Yes;