Like others, I have been having problems with random backup failures due
to network IO errors. See this thread for another example:
http://bacula.10910.n7.nabble.com/Win32-FD-Write-error-sending-N-bytes-to-Storage-daemon-td35109.html
I understand that this is not a bug in Bacula: its going to b
> Okay wait a minute. Drive index should at 0 not 1
>
I meant to say "Drive index should start at 0 not 1"
John
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Li
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:55 PM, John Drescher wrote:
>> so, just to be sure, my config snippets doesnt look wrong? i thought maybe
>> we had screwed the config...
>
> It did not look wrong. Although I did not spend 10 minutes looking at
> it so I could have missed something.
Okay wait a minute.
> so, just to be sure, my config snippets doesnt look wrong? i thought maybe
> we had screwed the config...
It did not look wrong. Although I did not spend 10 minutes looking at
it so I could have missed something.
John
>
> Definitely a sign that mtx-changer needs to be adjusted for your system.
>
>
so, just to be sure, my config snippets doesnt look wrong? i thought maybe
we had screwed the config...
--
Roberto Scattini
--
Everyone hate
> some the mtx-changer tests are running fine (we tested moving tapes between
> slots, but it has problem with loading, the prompt never returns)
>
Definitely a sign that mtx-changer needs to be adjusted for your system.
John
-
> it think that this autochanger does have barcode reader... can you point me
> to the documentation about barcode readers?
>
http://www.bacula.org/en/dev-manual/main/main/Autochanger_Resource.html
John
--
Everyone hates
Is the Volume Shadow Copy service running on this machine? It sometime is
set as a manual service instead of an automatic one.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Jean-Gabriel Duquesnoy <
d...@jgduke.dnsalias.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have now as far as I can see, managed to correctly configure Bacula
> any idea, what is causing this error? I know this is not aBacula error,
> but an error on the Windows side, but google did not deliver any valid
> information when searching for the reported error.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
Here is the cause:
> Driver="Win32 VSS", Drive(s)="C"
> 18-Mär
hi john,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 7:19 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Roberto Scattini
> wrote:
> > hi list,
> >
> > we have a Dell TL2000 with one robot and two drives, and we cant
> configure
> > it. we receive the error "3999 Device "Autochanger" not found or coul
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Roberto Scattini
wrote:
> hi list,
>
> we have a Dell TL2000 with one robot and two drives, and we cant configure
> it. we receive the error "3999 Device "Autochanger" not found or could not
> be opened." when we try to label a tape.
>
Does user bacula (or whateve
I have created a migration job and set the client field to access01-fd.
According to what I read in the manual, the directive Client must be specified
but will be ignored. The migration job appears to be working but I want the
heading of each migration job to be that of the client being migrat
Hi,
I have now as far as I can see, managed to correctly configure Bacula
to backup my Windows7 32Bits PC from the Linux Server. But still
something is wrong which causes the backup to fail.
This is what can be found in the log:
18-Mär 22:28 duke40-pc-fd JobId 16: Generate VSS snapshots.
Driver
Forwarding to the user list. I have no time to look at this now..
-- Forwarded message --
From: Melvin Ross
Date: Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Which full back up is an
incremental/differential back up based on if multiple full back ups
exist within mul
> That was why I utilized the Volume Use Duration option. I thought that
> regardless of disk space, it should mark the volume as "Used" after the
> specified time period. Now if I adjust my retention periods to be shorter
> amounts of time, say 1 day, then the volumes should get recycled after
> V
> No, this was a mistake on my part not properly understanding the Volume
> Retention Period Directive. I obviously skimmed through that part of the
> documentation and should have paid closer attention. I'm correcting that
> error now. Thank you very much for pointing it out. All files are being
>
No, this was a mistake on my part not properly understanding the Volume
Retention Period Directive. I obviously skimmed through that part of the
documentation and should have paid closer attention. I'm correcting that
error now. Thank you very much for pointing it out. All files are being
written t
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:44 PM, John Drescher wrote:
>> Pool {
>> Name = YearlyPool
>> Pool Type = Backup
>> Volume Retention = 59 months
>> Recycle = yes
>> AutoPrune = yes
>> Volume Use Duration = 59 months
>> }
>
> BTW, Do you really want to use a volume for 59 months then mark it
> Pool {
> Name = YearlyPool
> Pool Type = Backup
> Volume Retention = 59 months
> Recycle = yes
> AutoPrune = yes
> Volume Use Duration = 59 months
> }
BTW, Do you really want to use a volume for 59 months then mark it
Used and hold it for a second 59 months before recycling?
John
-
On 3/16/13 11:43 AM, "Phil Stracchino" wrote:
>On 03/16/13 06:18, Jérôme Blion wrote:
>> Le 16/03/2013 10:54, Uwe Schuerkamp a écrit :
>>> My question: Is there some way to optimize the catalog dump to make
>>> the import faster, like maybe omitting indices and re-creating them
>>> manually once
As the title says, I want to know if within a JobID, does bacula possess
any logic verification when selecting which full back up to base
incremental/differential back ups on or does it simply uses the latest
one. The reason for this question is due to the nature of my
schedule/volume configurat
21 matches
Mail list logo
