Hello again. So I've been reading and learning (a little) about
SELinux today, but
I haven't made much progress. Setting selinux to permissive
resolves the error. Selinux context on my
/var/www/webacula is:
Please respond to the bottom of the message, or inline. This makes it easier
to follow the discussion.
On Nov 20, 2012, at 2:06 PM, Felip Moll wrote:
> 2012/11/20 Melissari, Ryan Joseph
> I didn't see this in your configuration you sent to the list, but I saw you
> mention a question about mu
So, my problem is that the retention period that I defined in the pools are
applied to the client regardless of the pool where the backup job is done?
So, probably, the pool defined for a 7 days retention is pruning all files
from the backups defined to run in a different pool, eg. 4 weeks, 1 mont
I didn't see this in your configuration you sent to the list, but I saw you
mention a question about multiple pools. I also saw you have retention
settings defined in both client and pool resources. Volume retention is the
only one out of the three that is a pool attribute. Job and client rete
This is correct. I took care of the priority for purging.
By the way, as you noticed, I must be able to restore individually the
files of the backup done at 01-nov 22.00h, from 01 nov to 01 dec.
On 06 november, the files of the backup were purged.. so NO 1 month
restore.. and was a full backup.
Zitat von Felip Moll :
> Hi people,
>
> Recently I found a problem when trying to recover my files from a Job. The
> Files of a Job are purged when they shouldn't be.
>
> ###
> ### RELEVANT CONFIGURATIONS
> ###
>
> Job {
> Name = "Back
Hi people,
Recently I found a problem when trying to recover my files from a Job. The
Files of a Job are purged when they shouldn't be.
For example:
On 1st November a job of 1TB data run. All went well. The Job was an
Incremental done every 6 months but it didn't find any previous Full
backup,
Am 20.11.2012 17:14, schrieb Jacky Carimalo:
> Le 20/11/2012 15:32, John Drescher a écrit :
>> Also you should avoid /dev/st0 and use /dev/nst0 since /dev/st0 can
>> cause corruption in your tapes.
>>
> But I have no choice :
>
> bacula2-64:~/bacula/bin# lsscsi -g
> [0:0:0:0]diskIFT
Am 20.11.2012 17:13, schrieb Jacky Carimalo:
> kern.log on the host machine :
> Nov 20 04:49:51 singleton.u06.univ-nantes.prive kernel: [1168599.570017]
> lpfc :08:00.0: 0:(0):0713 SCSI layer issued Device Reset (1, 0)
> return x2002
> Nov 20 04:49:51 singleton.u06.univ-nantes.prive kernel: [
Zitat von Jacky Carimalo :
> Le 20/11/2012 15:32, John Drescher a écrit :
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:30 AM, John Drescher wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Jacky Carimalo
>>> wrote:
I put Volume Use Duration = 36 months,
but always having sometimes :
Error: bloc
Hello,
2012/11/20 Jacky Carimalo
> Yes, LTP102L1 is a tape volume.
> I defined Maximum Volumes = 1000 ; as you said, it would be better having
> no line like this ; but I think it would be the same :
>
Parameter Maximum Volumes = 1000 do not cause volume to be set as Used. You
have to use Max
Le 20/11/2012 15:32, John Drescher a écrit :
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:30 AM, John Drescher wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Jacky Carimalo
>> wrote:
>>> I put Volume Use Duration = 36 months,
>>> but always having sometimes :
>>>
>>> Error: block.c:590 Write error at 88:2499 on devi
Le 20/11/2012 15:30, John Drescher a écrit :
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Jacky Carimalo
> wrote:
>> I put Volume Use Duration = 36 months,
>> but always having sometimes :
>>
>> Error: block.c:590 Write error at 88:2499 on device "OVL_LTO-3_Drive-2"
>> (/dev/st0). ERR=Erreur d'entrée/sorti
On Nov 20, 2012, at 8:27 AM, Bill Arlofski wrote:
> On 11/20/12 07:15, Geert Stappers wrote:
>> Op 20121120 om 11:35 schreef Julien Cochennec:
>>> On 19/11/2012 10:12, Julien Cochennec wrote:
>>>> On 13/11/2012 00:14, Dan Langille wrote:
>>>>> Try
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:30 AM, John Drescher wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Jacky Carimalo
> wrote:
>> I put Volume Use Duration = 36 months,
>> but always having sometimes :
>>
>> Error: block.c:590 Write error at 88:2499 on device "OVL_LTO-3_Drive-2"
>> (/dev/st0). ERR=Erreur d'en
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Jacky Carimalo
wrote:
> I put Volume Use Duration = 36 months,
> but always having sometimes :
>
> Error: block.c:590 Write error at 88:2499 on device "OVL_LTO-3_Drive-2"
> (/dev/st0). ERR=Erreur d'entrée/sortie.
> Error: Error writing final EOF to tape. This Volu
Yes, LTP102L1 is a tape volume.
I defined Maximum Volumes = 1000 ; as you said, it would be better
having no line like this ; but I think it would be the same :
having sometimes :
Error: block.c:590 Write error at 88:2499 on device "OVL_LTO-3_Drive-2"
(/dev/st0). ERR=Erreur d'entrée/sortie.
E
I put Volume Use Duration = 36 months,
but always having sometimes :
Error: block.c:590 Write error at 88:2499 on device "OVL_LTO-3_Drive-2"
(/dev/st0). ERR=Erreur d'entrée/sortie.
Error: Error writing final EOF to tape. This Volume may not be readable.
dev.c:1566 ioctl MTWEOF error on "OVL_LTO
On 11/20/12 07:15, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Op 20121120 om 11:35 schreef Julien Cochennec:
>> On 19/11/2012 10:12, Julien Cochennec wrote:
>>> On 13/11/2012 00:14, Dan Langille wrote:
>>>> Try installing a 5.0.1 client.
>>> Ok, done, but the problem is sti
On 11/12/12 05:28, Julien Cochennec wrote:> Hi everybody, here's a Fileset
that's driving me crazy :
> FileSet {
>Name = "Home Machin Linux Backup"
>Include {
> Options {
>signature = MD5
>compression = GZIP
> }
> File = /home/machin
>}
>Exclude {
>
Yes.
I figured out SELinux is the problem. If I disable it, the errors stop. Now to
figure out how to configure SELinux so it plays nice with Apache.
Thanks
On Nov 20, 2012, at 2:17 AM, Radosław Korzeniewski
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2012/11/19 Ryan Jantz
>> I am able to run the above command i
Op 20121120 om 11:35 schreef Julien Cochennec:
> On 19/11/2012 10:12, Julien Cochennec wrote:
> > On 13/11/2012 00:14, Dan Langille wrote:
> >> Try installing a 5.0.1 client.
> > Ok, done, but the problem is still the same. I had to compile it. Ain't
> > there
On 19/11/2012 10:12, Julien Cochennec wrote:
> On 13/11/2012 00:14, Dan Langille wrote:
>> Try installing a 5.0.1 client.
> Ok, done, but the problem is still the same. I had to compile it. Ain't
> there any archive repository where I can find those?
> Anyway the problem hasn't changed, still no da
Hello,
2012/11/19 Ryan Jantz
> I am able to run the above command in terminal as root and the apache
> user without any errors. The apache user is a member of the bacula group.
>
(...)
Any ideas?
>
Did you restart an apache webserver?
best regards
--
Radosław Korzeniewski
rados...@korzeniews
Hello,
2012/11/19 Jacky Carimalo
> Le 19/11/2012 12:00, Alan Brown a écrit :
> > On 19/11/12 11:04, Jacky Carimalo wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> I have the same problem.
> >> Bacula stopped filling a tape after 4 errors, as described below !
> >> I would like to be able to tell it to continue ...
> >
25 matches
Mail list logo
