Can anyone explain why a FileSet is required when migrating/copying from one
volume to another?
Essentially we have an "OFFSITE" backup that I want on local (iSCSI) disk, then
to be copied to LTO-4 tape.
There are several backup jobs, each with a different FileSet selection.
Can anyone suggest
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Geert Stappers <
> geert.stapp...@vanadgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> Op 20121002 om 14:48 schreef Martin Simmons:
>> > >>>>> On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 07:15:57 -0400, Boris Eps
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Simon Tyler wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> I don't know about another application but bacula does correctly read the
> barcode labels during: update slots scan eg. below.
BTW, You should never run update slots scan if you have a barcode
reader on your autochanger. Use update
The output below indicates that there is a bacula label on the tapes, otherwise
you would receive and Input/Output error and a message about it not being a
bacula labeled tape. I have run into this issue before and it took a bit of
manual manipulation to get the catalog to be updated to where t
On 10/2/2012 11:08 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> I remember back when I was an Amanda Backup user, one of the features
> that I liked the most was it's ability to to allow you to backup
> directly to virtual 'tapes' that you could store on Amazon S3. Does
> bacula currently offer any
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Geert Stappers <
geert.stapp...@vanadgroup.com> wrote:
> Op 20121002 om 14:48 schreef Martin Simmons:
> > >>>>> On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 07:15:57 -0400, Boris Epstein said:
> > >
> > > I was thinking along the same lines. A
Op 20121002 om 14:48 schreef Martin Simmons:
> >>>>> On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 07:15:57 -0400, Boris Epstein said:
> >
> > I was thinking along the same lines. All I got was some message about
> > repetitive function definitions - none of them anything I could r
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 07:15:57 -0400, Boris Epstein said:
>
> I was thinking along the same lines. All I got was some message about
> repetitive function definitions - none of them anything I could recognize
> or easily make sense of.
Could be a name clash, but you should obviously post the fu
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Geert Stappers <
geert.stapp...@vanadgroup.com> wrote:
> Op 20121001 om 17:59 schreef Boris Epstein:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I've got an OpenIndiana machine (SunOS 5.11) on which I am trying to
> compile
> > Bacula 5.2.12 with Postgres support. As I go along it fails
>
> >I did a couple of installations and I never faced with this error
>
> >before. Anyway, never say never again.
>
> >In the first scenario we were backing up to tape for a few years and
>
> >then migrated to a disc based solution. Everything worked like a charm.
>
> >This particular pro
On 02/10/12 01:35, Stephen Thompson wrote:
>
>
> Correction, the non-problem drive has a higher "ECC fast" error count,
> but the problem drive has a significantly higher "Corrective algorithm
> invocations" count.
>
What that means is that it rewrote the data, which accounts for the
lower throug
11 matches
Mail list logo
