Am 05.03.2012 15:28, schrieb Kleber l:
> 2012/3/5 Gael Guilmin
>> On 05/03/12 14:00, Gael Guilmin wrote:
>>> I'd like to know if there is a way to allow the use of multi-cores
>> during a backup and especially for the compression of the data?
>>
>> Why do you want compression?
> No, you dont n
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:49 PM, John Drescher wrote:
>> What I'm after is a more hands-off approach. A simple set-it and forget-it
>> feature. I need Bacula to "make these decisions" without any human
>> intervention.
>>
>> If the last tape with Append status is not available bacula should
> What I'm after is a more hands-off approach. A simple set-it and forget-it
> feature. I need Bacula to "make these decisions" without any human
> intervention.
>
> If the last tape with Append status is not available bacula should do the
> following:
>
> 1. Notify the backup admin
> 2. Th
What I'm after is a more hands-off approach. A simple set-it and forget-it
feature. I need Bacula to "make these decisions" without any human
intervention.
If the last tape with Append status is not available bacula should do the
following:
1. Notify the backup admin
2. Then wait 2 hour
On 28/03/12 18.32, Thomas Bennett wrote:
> I am having some hardware issues because of several HVAC outages. So if
> I am doing a pg_dump of the bacula database on PostgreSQL, do I need to
> include oids?
You don't need them for Bacula.
andrea
---
> What is process for removing tapes that are not yet full from that tape
> library?
> When I remove a not-yet-full tape from tape library and neglect to change
> its status to "Full", Bacula does not alert me that it's waiting for that
> tape to be mounted. Furthermore, it does not attempt
What is process for removing tapes that are not yet full from that tape library?
When I remove a not-yet-full tape from tape library and neglect to change its
status to "Full", Bacula does not alert me that it's waiting for that tape
to be mounted. Furthermore, it does not attempt to use ano
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:40:07AM -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> I don't think you should need to do either of those. I have a total of
> five pools - Full-Disk, Diff-Disk, Incr-Disk, and Full-Tape, plus a
> scratch pool - but all of my disk volumes are in the same /spool/bacula
> directory re
On 03/29/2012 09:59 AM, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 09:41:40AM -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>
>> I confess I don't see why you'd need to do that. But then, I keep all
>> my disk-based volumes in one place to start with, and have simply never
>> had a problem.
>
> Hi Phil,
>
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 09:41:40AM -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> I confess I don't see why you'd need to do that. But then, I keep all
> my disk-based volumes in one place to start with, and have simply never
> had a problem.
Hi Phil,
the reasons are mostly historical: I started doing increme
On 03/29/2012 09:19 AM, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 08:59:05AM -0400, Craig Van Tassle wrote:
>
>> I had this issue in the past as well. The solution was to change what
>> type of media. Here is an example out of my SD configuration file.
>>
>> Device = Differential
>> Medi
I would check the source of the catalog backup script and see what options it
uses.
--
Jeff MacDonald
j...@terida.com
902 880 7375
On 2012-03-29, at 10:15 AM, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I don't think bacula uses oids, however, it doesn't hurt if you
> include them (I think)
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 08:59:05AM -0400, Craig Van Tassle wrote:
> I had this issue in the past as well. The solution was to change what
> type of media. Here is an example out of my SD configuration file.
>
> Device = Differential
> Media Type = File-Diff
>
Hi Craig,
thanks much for you
Hi!
I don't think bacula uses oids, however, it doesn't hurt if you
include them (I think).
What pgsql version are you using? (you said 8, but: 8.0, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4).
You could also use online backups, and do WAL archiving (maybe even
continuous WAL archiving), here:
http://www.postgresql.org
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:08:11 +0200
Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> we recently changed our backup policy from tape- to disk-based, so I
> created two pools based on separate filestorage devices (two separate
> dirs) to hold the full and incremental backup volumes.
>
> Today I tried a re
Hi folks,
we recently changed our backup policy from tape- to disk-based, so I
created two pools based on separate filestorage devices (two separate
dirs) to hold the full and incremental backup volumes.
Today I tried a restore job using both incr. and full volumes, and
when bacula (5.2.6 on ce
Hi all,
I create a pool, and 3 jobs which works on that pool (a
full, base and incremental job).
My question is :
How make file
retention and job retention differents for the 3 jobs, but on the same
pool ?
I see I can give file retention parameter on pool, but not on
jobs.
Can I do tha
17 matches
Mail list logo
