Hi folks, we recently changed our backup policy from tape- to disk-based, so I created two pools based on separate filestorage devices (two separate dirs) to hold the full and incremental backup volumes.
Today I tried a restore job using both incr. and full volumes, and when bacula (5.2.6 on centos 6) needed to access the incremental volumes, it tried to open them in the full filestorage directory as opposed to the incremental filestorage directory. I worked around the situation by creating symlinks in the full filestorage directory pointing to the incremental backup volume files and bacula readily accepted those links and read the incremental stuff off the volumes. I wonder if this is the expected behaviour, or would it be better to keep both pools in a single directory (if that's even possible)? Should I have modified the Storage resource before starting the restore job (alhough the restore job needed both full and incremental volumes)? All the best & thanks in advance, Uwe -- NIONEX --- Ein Unternehmen der Bertelsmann AG ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
