[Bacula-users] Recover bacula Jobs (if job fail)

2012-01-31 Thread Anatoly S. Zimin
Good day! I have some failed jobs. This jobs fail on "script after". Consequently files have been saved on the tape. Can I manually edit these jobs for restore? For example correcting the database. Thanks! -- Keep Your D

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger Problem: Second label is not being mounted

2012-01-31 Thread Isamar Maia
2012/1/31 : > In the message dated: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:50:07 -0200, > The pithy ruminations from Isamar Maia on > > wer > e: > => 2012/1/31 : > => > In the message dated: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:14:24 -0200, > => > The pithy ruminations from Isamar Maia on > => > <[Bacula-users] Autochanger Proble

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger Problem: Second label is not being mounted

2012-01-31 Thread mark . bergman
In the message dated: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:50:07 -0200, The pithy ruminations from Isamar Maia on wer e: => 2012/1/31 : => > In the message dated: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:14:24 -0200, => > The pithy ruminations from Isamar Maia on => > <[Bacula-users] Autochanger Problem: Second label is not being mo

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger Problem: Second label is not being mounted

2012-01-31 Thread Isamar Maia
2012/1/31 : > In the message dated: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:14:24 -0200, > The pithy ruminations from Isamar Maia on > <[Bacula-users] Autochanger Problem: Second label is not being mounted> were: > => Hi Folks, > => > => We are using a HP 1x8 G2 AutoLDR Autochanger with Bacula version 5.2.3 > => > =>

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula block size

2012-01-31 Thread John Drescher
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC] wrote: > This is what I have done so far: > > Added the Minimum Block Size = 262144/Maximum Block Size = 262144 in the > Bacula-sd.conf > > Erased the tape in the tape drive which was in the Append status and > re-lab

Re: [Bacula-users] Autochanger Problem: Second label is not being mounted

2012-01-31 Thread mark . bergman
In the message dated: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:14:24 -0200, The pithy ruminations from Isamar Maia on <[Bacula-users] Autochanger Problem: Second label is not being mounted> were: => Hi Folks, => => We are using a HP 1x8 G2 AutoLDR Autochanger with Bacula version 5.2.3 => => We're facing the followin

Re: [Bacula-users] missing a file during verification

2012-01-31 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:02:59 -0800, Doug Sampson said: > > > > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:28:47 -0800, Doug Sampson said: > > > > > > Hello- > > > > > > Since upgrading to 5.2.3 from 5.0.3 on a FreeBSD 7.4 server two > weeks > > > ago, I've started seeing this message: > > > > > > 28-Jan 06:

[Bacula-users] Autochanger Problem: Second label is not being mounted

2012-01-31 Thread Isamar Maia
Hi Folks, We are using a HP 1x8 G2 AutoLDR Autochanger with Bacula version 5.2.3 We're facing the following problem: 1) When I restart Bacula and run a Daily backup job, it automatically mounts the first tape, labeled as "KDZ000L4"(tape1) and it works perfectly well. 2) In the sequence, when i

Re: [Bacula-users] missing a file during verification

2012-01-31 Thread Doug Sampson
> > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:28:47 -0800, Doug Sampson said: > > > > Hello- > > > > Since upgrading to 5.2.3 from 5.0.3 on a FreeBSD 7.4 server two weeks > > ago, I've started seeing this message: > > > > 28-Jan 06:08 pisces-sd JobId 8299: End of Volume at file 1 on device > > "FileStoragecepheus

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula block size

2012-01-31 Thread Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC]
This is what I have done so far: Added the Minimum Block Size = 262144/Maximum Block Size = 262144 in the Bacula-sd.conf Erased the tape in the tape drive which was in the Append status and re-labeled it. Now if I run tapeinfo: # tapeinfo -f /dev/sg0 Product Type: Tape Drive Vendor ID: 'IBM

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula block size

2012-01-31 Thread Alan Brown
On 31/01/12 17:54, John Drescher wrote: > I believe changing the fixed block size requires this. Also remember > that after this change you will not be able to read any tapes that had > the default block size. This is why I still use the default at work. Double check this. I increased block size

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula block size

2012-01-31 Thread John Drescher
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC] wrote: > John, > > My backup server is still in the testing phase so I can erase the tape or > relabel them and then run the tapeinfo command to see if the block size has > changed. If I decide to go back to the defau

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula block size

2012-01-31 Thread John Drescher
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC] wrote: > John, > > Did you erase the tape after the change? > No, I have not erased the tape after I updated the /Bacula-sd.conf with the. > > Minimum Block Size = 262144 > Maximum Block Size = 262144 > > So, should I

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 5.2.5 and Mac

2012-01-31 Thread Marco van Wieringen
Mike Hobbs mtl.mit.edu> writes: > > I've successfully built 5.2.3 on OSX 10.6 and 5.2.5 on both OSX 10.6 and > 10.7. Backups and restores seem to work fine. I do get this error and > I was hoping someone might have an idea. I was also hoping someone > could maybe share their FileSet defini

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula block size

2012-01-31 Thread John Drescher
2012/1/31 Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC] : > I have Bacula 5.2.3 compiled on a RHEL 6 Server. I have IBM TS3200 Tape > Library with two tape drives: LTO5 FH. I looking to see how I can get the > best performance and speed up my backups > > > > I checked with IBM and was told that my

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula block size

2012-01-31 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:41:27 -0600 "Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC]" wrote: > I have Bacula 5.2.3 compiled on a RHEL 6 Server. I have IBM TS3200 > Tape Library with two tape drives: LTO5 FH. I looking to see how I > can get the best performance and speed up my backups [...] > I adde

[Bacula-users] Bacula 5.2.5 and Mac

2012-01-31 Thread Mike Hobbs
I've successfully built 5.2.3 on OSX 10.6 and 5.2.5 on both OSX 10.6 and 10.7. Backups and restores seem to work fine. I do get this error and I was hoping someone might have an idea. I was also hoping someone could maybe share their FileSet definitions with me so I can see how others are ba

[Bacula-users] bacula block size

2012-01-31 Thread Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC]
I have Bacula 5.2.3 compiled on a RHEL 6 Server. I have IBM TS3200 Tape Library with two tape drives: LTO5 FH. I looking to see how I can get the best performance and speed up my backups I checked with IBM and was told that my tape drives support a maximum block size of 256k. My understanding

Re: [Bacula-users] missing a file during verification

2012-01-31 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:28:47 -0800, Doug Sampson said: > > Hello- > > Since upgrading to 5.2.3 from 5.0.3 on a FreeBSD 7.4 server two weeks > ago, I've started seeing this message: > > 28-Jan 06:08 pisces-sd JobId 8299: End of Volume at file 1 on device > "FileStoragecepheus" (/backup), Vo

[Bacula-users] Bacula Encryption, master key and certificate, how to check the content ?

2012-01-31 Thread Hugo Letemplier
Hello By the past, I made experimentations with bacula certificates. When passing Bacula in "Production", I reset every certificates on all the client in order to make everything fine. It appears recently that I couldn't restore a windows server with the master keypair because the master.cert was

Re: [Bacula-users] VirtualFull please mount volume message

2012-01-31 Thread Tom
I eventuelly copied the volume files into the other directory and changed the definition of the second file device to that folder. This works as he is now able to locate the volume. For now it will work, but if the data grows I will have to come up with a different solution as the volume will b

[Bacula-users] Relabelling a Volume

2012-01-31 Thread Buschini Edouard
Hello, After days of research, I didn't find a way to relabel a volume. Let me explain : That file is a volume from my pool. Physical informations : # bls -L /mnt/space1/bacula/storage/db/mailo/Dbfile-mailo-db1-4-1900 Id: Bacula 1.0 immortal VerNo : 11 VolName

Re: [Bacula-users] Schedule virtual servers so their not running concurrently

2012-01-31 Thread Jérôme Blion
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:20:15 +, keith wrote: > We have about 80 virtual servers running on 20 Physical servers that > need backed up. > > Our Bacula implementation is now at scheduling stage and we are stuck > trying to figure out how to get the virtual servers to backup without > them all runn

Re: [Bacula-users] Windows File Daemon: "VSS" or "System State" or both ?

2012-01-31 Thread Hugo Letemplier
2012/1/27 Kevin Keane (subscriptions) : > A VSS backup and system state are *not* equivalent. In my mind, trying to > back up Windows with plain VSS snapshots is not much better than not having > any backups. > > > > Conceptually, the system state backup is two things: a predefined file set, > and

Re: [Bacula-users] VirtualFull please mount volume message

2012-01-31 Thread Xabier Elkano
El 30/01/12 09:22, Tom escribió: > Hello, > > this is my setup. I defined 2 filebased storage devices, file-1 and > file-2. They are mapped to the folder /bacula-stor/file-1 and > /bacula-stor/file-2. I defined 2 pools, pool-1 and pool-2, that are > mapped to the storage devices. Pool-1 has his