Am 01.12.2011 08:25, schrieb James Harper:
>>
>> Is it possible to have an Spool Data directive for migrating jobs?
>>
> I don't think you can do that. You could migrate to fast disk first then
> to the fast tape. Not as efficient as spooling but if you have lots of
> jobs it wouldn't be that bad.
got close to 120 MBs, using 64kb buffer and 20gb maximum file size
using btape...now test with real data...gary
===
blocksize set with mt and in bacula-sd.conf to == 65536
===
[root@genepi1 bac
btape getting 89 MBs, so maybe my disk and sql updating is effecting
the speed? note drive has a 16384 blocksize, ran tapeinfo on the
drive...gary
[root@genepi1 bacula]# btape -c /etc/bacula/bacula-sd.conf /dev/nst0
Tape block granularity is 1024 bytes.
btape: butil.c:284 Using device: "/dev/nst0"
In the message dated: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:27:33 GMT,
The pithy ruminations from Alan Brown on
were:
=> gary artim wrote:
=> > You guys/gals are great, very responsive! I did try
=> > spooling/despooling and my run times shot up.
=>
=> They will - you're copying everything twice (disk to disk to
In the message dated: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:48:59 +0100,
The pithy ruminations from Bruno Friedmann on
were:
=> On 12/01/2011 12:20 AM, mark.berg...@uphs.upenn.edu wrote:
=> > Item 1: Administrative connections to the file daemon should not count
in the concurrency li
=> mit
=> > Origin: Mark
Dear all,
I'm proud to announce you that a new version of Bacula-Web is coming by next
few days.
This new version will include
- Improvements with configuration, database connectivity and application
exceptions
- Translations update and improvements
- Cleaned dashboard
- New custom filters
gary artim wrote:
> You guys/gals are great, very responsive! I did try
> spooling/despooling and my run times shot up.
They will - you're copying everything twice (disk to disk to tape), but
this is the only way to achieve fast despooling speeds - if you don't do
this then your LTO drive will s
I believe (its been a while since I have needed to change my
configuration) that my LTO-3 drive does not do hardware compression on
blocks over 512K. I am using 256K blocks right now, and I did not see
any improvement above that. I am using spooling on a pair of striped
hard disks, and despoo
You guys/gals are great, very responsive! I did try
spooling/despooling and my run times shot up. I was using a simple
7200 drive though, no ssd or raid...I assume the performance gain
happens when your networks multi machines...wearing multiple hats so
will report back on btape next week, unless I
gary artim wrote:
> thank much! will try testing with btape.
Please let us know the results
> btw, I ran with 20GB maximum
> file size/2MB max block (see bacula-sd.conf below) and got these
> results, 20MB/s increase, ran 20 minutes faster, got 50MBs --
You should be seeing 120Mb/s or thereabo
thank much! will try testing with btape. btw, I ran with 20GB maximum
file size/2MB max block (see bacula-sd.conf below) and got these
results, 20MB/s increase, ran 20 minutes faster, got 50MBs -- now if I
can just double the speed I could backup 15TB in about 45/hrs. I don't
have that much data ye
I agree, it's unlikely a 'new' bug, but rather the restarting of my
director during the upgrade that caused the problem to exhibit itself.
Here is what happened in more detail.
A week before the upgrade/director restart, the conf files for a
significant number of jobs (~100) were changed and
On 01.12.2011 13:42, Miikael Havelock Nilson wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I have a small question. When virtualfull is made will data pass trought the
> director? Question is in the case the storage is on low bandwith will data
> move from storage to director and back to storage or storage to storage?
>
Carsten Pache:
> >> A few days ago I had to restore some files. After the files were
> >> restored successfully, the VolStatus (shown by "list volumes") of the
> >> two tapes that were needed during restore changed from "Append" to
> >> "Used". Is this an expected behaviour?
> >
> > Do you hava a
Hello,
I have a small question. When virtualfull is made will data pass trought the
director? Question is in the case the storage is on low bandwith will data move
from storage to director and back to storage or storage to storage?
Miikael
---
Hi, I'm seeing what I think is suboptimal behaviour during some
testing, maybe one of the Bacula guru's can help/explain what's going
on here. I think it might be since the behaviour I want only happens
when a job first requests a tape (and what I'm seeking is a way to get
it to request _agai
>> A few days ago I had to restore some files. After the files were
>> restored successfully, the VolStatus (shown by "list volumes") of the
>> two tapes that were needed during restore changed from "Append" to
>> "Used". Is this an expected behaviour?
> Do you hava a maximum use time configured?
Hello.
I want always restore files to the one Client by default. How can I do this?
Thanks.
--
Viacheslav Biriukov
BR
http://biriukov.com
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a defi
Carsten Pache:
> A few days ago I had to restore some files. After the files were
> restored successfully, the VolStatus (shown by "list volumes") of the
> two tapes that were needed during restore changed from "Append" to
> "Used". Is this an expected behaviour?
Do you hava a maximum use time con
A few days ago I had to restore some files. After the files were restored
successfully, the VolStatus (shown by "list volumes") of the two tapes that
were needed during restore changed from "Append" to "Used". Is this an expected
behaviour?
Regards
Carsten Pache
-
On 12/01/2011 12:20 AM, mark.berg...@uphs.upenn.edu wrote:
> Item 1: Administrative connections to the file daemon should not count in
> the concurrency limit
> Origin: Mark Bergman
> Date: Wed Nov 30 18:03:20 EST 2011
> Status:
>
> What:
>Administrative connections to the
21 matches
Mail list logo
