On Sep 27, 2011, at 12:42 PM, René Moser wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 16:51 +0100, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
>
>> It sounds like what you're looking for could be implemented as:
>>
>> 1. A normal Full/Differential/Incremental job to a disk-based storage
>> device to happen during the day.
>> 2.
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 02:18 -0700, reaper wrote:
> if i understand you correctly, bacula is only using a 128k -- way too
> small? curious -- have you played with "Maximum Network Buffer Size" ?
> does this help?
>
> Yes, that's correct, bacula can only scale window to 128k that's why
> throughput
if i understand you correctly, bacula is only using a 128k -- way too small?
curious -- have you played with "Maximum Network Buffer Size" ? does this help?
Yes, that's correct, bacula can only scale window to 128k that's why throughput
gets limited to 10Mbit/s. With ssh tunnel between client an
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 23:43 -0700, reaper wrote:
> i have noticed that scp is not a good measure of throughput -- i do not know
> why. i use an openvpn tunnel between sites and loose about 20% of throughput
> due to the tunnel. check window size on distant machine (using wireshark) to
> verify
