On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 23:43 -0700, reaper wrote:
> i have noticed that scp is not a good measure of throughput -- i do not know
> why. i use an openvpn tunnel between sites and loose about 20% of throughput
> due to the tunnel. check window size on distant machine (using wireshark) to
> verify that some upstream device is not changing it.
>
> No, no, no. You missing the point. iperf with no window tuning can scale it
> to 3MB during test while bacula can only do 128k. Values are from Send-Q in
> ss -t on client.
hi reaper,
if i understand you correctly, bacula is only using a 128k -- way too
small? curious -- have you played with "Maximum Network Buffer Size" ?
does this help?
cheers
m
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
