On 09/16/10 16:22, David Noriega wrote:
> Its an idea, but not what I asked. I would have gone with a completely
> disked based backup, but that kind of hardware is expensive to do it
> right. I asked about multiplexing. I figure I could take /home and
> break it down into /home/[a-k] or something.
> 1- I have my tapes all tied to the 'Default' pool. I want a tape to be used
> every day i.e. have tapes for MON, TUE, WED, THU, FRI doing incremental
> backups. On Monday I want to use only one tape regardless of whether it is
> full or not. On tuesday I want the autolaoder to use the Tuesday
David Noriega wrote:
> Its an idea, but not what I asked. I would have gone with a completely
> disked based backup, but that kind of hardware is expensive to do it
> right. I asked about multiplexing. I figure I could take /home and
My apologies, I distinctly thought you said "as much data as the
Its an idea, but not what I asked. I would have gone with a completely
disked based backup, but that kind of hardware is expensive to do it
right. I asked about multiplexing. I figure I could take /home and
break it down into /home/[a-k] or something. Break /home into say four
pieces but it doesn't
David Noriega wrote:
> both drives and 2) has as much data as these drives can take pouring
> into them, since this is taking too long to do a backup. I've read a
One solution to feed your drives at full speed, is to build a low cost
server containing an array of SATA drives, sufficient to hold
for the bacula-bat srpm i tried using
$ rpmbuild --rebuild --define build_centos5 1 --define build_mysql 1
bacula-bat-5.0.3-1.src.rpm
and the package would build correctly but when i installed it with
$ rpm-ivh "package name
i got a couple weird errors:
fg: no job control, and the other one ab
I need some help coming up with a good backup strategy for our
situation. I have about 10TB of user home directories(and about the
same for lab shares). I've gone through the manual, tutorials, etc and
have gotten the basics of Bacula working. I have it setup using our
SL48 and its currently backin
On 09/16/10 10:31, sid009 wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Apologies if these questions have been done to death but I couldn't
> find specific answers. Bacula documentation seems overwhelming
>
> I have a few questions I am hoping someone can help with.
>
> 1- I have my tapes all tied to the 'Default' pool
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/16/2010 04:43 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> No. Bacula does not throttle bandwidth. Are you using spooling? Do you
> have millions of small files? Are the source disks highly fragmented?
> Are we talking about full backups because any other level wi
> Hi at all,
> I've noticed that our backup system keeps much time to finish servers'
> backup. Monitoring our 100Mbps net, by cacti, I see that backup speed
> run at 1MBps, at least, meanwhile on another 1000Mbps we could have a
> 10MBps backup. This condition is the same over many different machi
Hi Guys,
Apologies if these questions have been done to death but I couldn't find
specific answers. Bacula documentation seems overwhelming
I have a few questions I am hoping someone can help with.
1- I have my tapes all tied to the 'Default' pool. I want a tape to be used
every day i.e. have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi at all,
I've noticed that our backup system keeps much time to finish servers'
backup. Monitoring our 100Mbps net, by cacti, I see that backup speed
run at 1MBps, at least, meanwhile on another 1000Mbps we could have a
10MBps backup. This condition
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:44:25 +0300, Silver Salonen said:
>
> On Thursday 16 September 2010 15:25:07 Martin Simmons wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:08:33 +0300, Silver Salonen said:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday 15 September 2010 16:49:18 Martin Simmons wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 15 Sep
On Thursday 16 September 2010 15:25:07 Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:08:33 +0300, Silver Salonen said:
> >
> > On Wednesday 15 September 2010 16:49:18 Martin Simmons wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:53:07 +0300, Silver Salonen said:
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday 14 Se
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:08:33 +0300, Silver Salonen said:
>
> On Wednesday 15 September 2010 16:49:18 Martin Simmons wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:53:07 +0300, Silver Salonen said:
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 21:54:21 Silver Salonen wrote:
> > > > On 14.09.2010 18:48,
Hello,
If there is any interest of displaying tape library drives in bat
status, please have a look at the dirty but effective patch sent along
with the email :).
Tested with mhvtl tool.
Thx
Jj
--- src/qt-console/storage/content.cpp.ori 2010-09-01 19:59:38.910814456
+0200
+++ src/qt-cons
16 matches
Mail list logo
