> Shouldn't it label as Error and not Full?
No. Bacula does not have a platform unspecific way to tell if the
error is because the tape reached its end or that the tape was not
writable past some point.
Error is only for volumes that bacula detects a mismatch between the #
of volume files that th
Shouldn't it label as Error and not Full? Is there a simple way to query all
Errored volumes without grepping the log file?
Thanks,
JJ
-Original Message-
From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 11:06 AM
To: Jeremiah D. Jester; bacula-users
Subject:
On 07/23/10 12:56, Jeremiah D. Jester wrote:
> Does this do the same thing as purge volume? Is one preferable over the other?
>
> *update volume=VOLNAME pool=Offsite slots volstatus=recycle Recycle=yes
No, it does not. This will ONLY update the volume status, leaving all
the records in the datab
> Does a media error mean what it says? Problem with the media. Do I need to
> basically test each volume w/ btape that I get an error with. Seems like a
> lot of work.
>
Could be a bad tape, kernel problem, sas/scsi problem, tape drive ...
Basically when the tape driver reports a write error t
> I have a volume (KL0445) reporting as Full though this seems suspect giving
> that the VolBytes column is so much smaller than the rest of my tapes.
> Included a snippet. Any reason for this or does this mean there is an error?
> Should I purge the volume and reuse?
>
When bacula hits a media e
I have a volume (KL0445) reporting as Full though this seems suspect giving
that the VolBytes column is so much smaller than the rest of my tapes. Included
a snippet. Any reason for this or does this mean there is an error? Should I
purge the volume and reuse?
| 77 | KL0406 | Full
2010/7/23 Simone Martina :
> On 07/23/2010 06:45 PM, Jeremiah D. Jester wrote:
>
> I have a volume that I am recycling back into the pool before the volume
> expiration date. How do I simply wipe this tape or start the write position
> to the beginning of the tape to overwrite the old data?
>
> Whe
> Does this do the same thing as purge volume? Is one preferable over the other?
>
> *update volume=VOLNAME pool=Offsite slots volstatus=recycle Recycle=yes
>
Purge cleans up the database (removes db records for jobs and files
that were on the volume) while update volume I am not sure.
John
Does this do the same thing as purge volume? Is one preferable over the other?
*update volume=VOLNAME pool=Offsite slots volstatus=recycle Recycle=yes
JJ
-Original Message-
From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 9:54 AM
To: Jeremiah D. Jester
Cc: b
> I have a volume that I am recycling back into the pool before the volume
> expiration date. How do I simply wipe this tape or start the write position
> to the beginning of the tape to overwrite the old data?
>
purge volume
John
-
On 07/23/2010 06:45 PM, Jeremiah D. Jester wrote:
I have a volume that I am recycling back into the pool before the
volume expiration date. How do I simply wipe this tape or start the
write position to the beginning of the tape to overwrite the old data?
When I've to force recycling a tape,
I have a volume that I am recycling back into the pool before the volume
expiration date. How do I simply wipe this tape or start the write position to
the beginning of the tape to overwrite the old data?
Thanks,
JJ
--
T
Thanks for all the work you do, this sounds great. Sounds a lot like the
Fedora Linux release cycle the last time I looked at it. Good luck on moving
to the new server and thanks to UKFast.
Thomas
On Friday 23 July 2010 11:54:03 Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a sort of mini-Bacul
2010/7/23 Marco Zancanaro :
> Hi, i've configured a bacula system in my local network. I need to do the
> backup locally for a fast backup and a fast retore, but i also need a remote
> backup for safety reason.
> I'm think of doing a remote copy of the volume that bacula creates. The
> problem is t
Ok, thanks for helping. I'll try to find a suitable solution based on you
suggestion.
Marco
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 16:45, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
> > "Marco Zancanaro" kirjoitti viestissä
> > news:aanlktilg5xz50f0nobugolb_qngdmsa1xvzbpnqjr...@mail.gmail.com...
> > Hi, i've configured a bacula sy
Hello,
This is a sort of mini-Bacula status report on the following:
1. Next release
2. New release cycle
3. New bugs tracking database
4. New Bacula server (www.bacula.org)
5. New Bacula source distribution server
1. Next release:
Before the end of August, we will be releasing the next vers
> "Marco Zancanaro" kirjoitti viestissä
> news:aanlktilg5xz50f0nobugolb_qngdmsa1xvzbpnqjr...@mail.gmail.com...
> Hi, i've configured a bacula system in my local network. I need to do the
> backup locally for a fast backup and a fast retore, but i also need a
> remote backup for safety reason.
> I'
Moin,
2010/7/23 :
> That seems strange. I presume you also didn't get a mail for job 54425?
Correct.
> I also don't know what to make of this. You could check the volumes to see if
> there was actually data written for the incremental job.
I checked, and it seems that the job did not actually
Hi, i've configured a bacula system in my local network. I need to do the
backup locally for a fast backup and a fast retore, but i also need a remote
backup for safety reason.
I'm think of doing a remote copy of the volume that bacula creates. The
problem is that the volume is very large, about 1
That seems strange. I presume you also didn't get a mail for job 54425? I also
don't know what to make of this. You could check the volumes to see if
there was actually data written for the incremental job.
>Moin,
>
>2010/7/22 :
>> I don't see anything wront with it. Can you post
>> /etc/bacul
On Friday, 23 July 2010 02:13:51 +0200,
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> Hi there Daniel!
Hi, Jeroen!
> > But when trying to run the startup script, I get the following
> > errors:
> >
> > [r...@localhost scripts]# /etc/init.d/bacula start
> > Starting the Bacula Storage daemon /usr/sbin/bacula-sd:
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:37:22 -0600, May, John said:
>
> The point I was making with my original post was that the file restore of
> the 6.2TB of data is taking many times longer than it did to back it up.
> For instance, I started the backup last Friday 7/22 and it still isn't
> finished tod
Moin,
2010/7/22 :
> I don't see anything wront with it. Can you post
> /etc/bacula/INCLUDES/schedules.conf ?
Sure, but I don't think that it would change anything, because the
described behaviour also happens if I comment out the schedule entry
and do a manually "run job=DiskToTape yes" on the c
23 matches
Mail list logo
