On Friday, 23 July 2010 02:13:51 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > Hi there Daniel!
Hi, Jeroen!
> > But when trying to run the startup script, I get the following
> > errors:
> >
> > [r...@localhost scripts]# /etc/init.d/bacula start
> > Starting the Bacula Storage daemon /usr/sbin/bacula-sd: error while loading
> > shared libraries:
> > libbacpy-5.0.1.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> > Starting the Bacula File daemon /usr/sbin/bacula-fd: error while loading
> > shared libraries:
> > libbacfind-5.0.1.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
> > directory
> > Starting the Bacula Director daemon /usr/sbin/bacula-dir: error while
> > loading shared libraries:
> > libbacfind-5.0.1.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
> > directory
> >
> > But the files are:
> >
> > [r...@localhost scripts]# ll /usr/lib/libbacpy-5.0.1.so
> > -rwxr-xr-- 1 root root 24083 jul 22 12:25 /usr/lib/libbacpy-5.0.1.so
> >
> > [r...@localhost scripts]# ll /usr/lib/libbacfind-5.0.1.so
> > -rwxr-xr-- 1 root root 228325 jul 22 12:25 /usr/lib/libbacfind-5.0.1.so
> Have you ran ldconfig? It generates the "available libraries" cache for the
> dynamic linker, and the dynamic linker is relatively strict about not
> searching various locations throughout the filesystem.
>
> You can verify dynamic linking capabilities with "ldd /path/to/binary".
>
> Also, you may want to consider Security Enhanced Linux. Verify with the
> "sestatus" command whether SELinux is enforcing the targeted policy, and if
> so, consider restoring the default context for the files freshly installed
> using restorecon, and if all else fails, please get back to us with ls -Z
> output ;-)
I was also trying to install Bacula 5.0.1 using the same procedure as
mentioned in previous email and I have the same problem. This procedure
was successful in Debian with the difference that there I updated a
previous version instead of installing from scratch.
Like I said, I followed the steps mentioned in the other email (I did
not run ldconfig manually) that had been successful in Debian. Using ldd
with these two libraries, I get the following:
[r...@localhost init.d]# ldd /usr/lib/libbacpy-5.0.1.so
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00002b4eb5ee7000)
libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00002b4eb61e7000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00002b4eb646a000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00002b4eb67c2000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x000000320a400000)
[r...@localhost init.d]# ldd /usr/lib/libbacfind-5.0.1.so
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00002b97a2131000)
libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00002b97a2431000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00002b97a26b4000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00002b97a2a0c000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x000000320a400000)
Comparing this output with the one I get with the same version of Bacula
(5.0.1) installed with the same procedure in Debian, I'm seeing that in
both files are additionally a reference to linux-vdso.so.1.
Can this be the cause of the problem?
Thanks for your reply.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Fingerprint: BFB3 08D6 B4D1 31B2 72B9 29CE 6696 BF1B 14E6 1D37
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux Lenny - Linux user #188.598
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
