Hello List
Here's my sittuation, I've two different Storages configured in Bacula,
which are my two Sun StorageTek SL24 tape storages. In one (called TPA),
i've all my monthly FULL backups and on the other (called TPB), i've mine
DIFFERENCIAL and INCREMENTAL backups.
The backups are working fine,
I forgot, my Bacula version is 3.0.2...
2010/5/25 Rodrigo Renie Braga
> Hello List
>
> Here's my sittuation, I've two different Storages configured in Bacula,
> which are my two Sun StorageTek SL24 tape storages. In one (called TPA),
> i've all my monthly FULL backups and on the other (called TP
I ended up working myself into the ground getting the backup system going and
missed part of the day today. Tonight everythign is going to run as is limping
along until I can find the issue.
Morty:
My core switch is HP Procurve 5412 which is managed. The ports are set to auto
and the two nic
Hello,
Anyone have an up to date howto on converting a mysql bacula database to
postgresql?
There are notes on the bacula site, but it appears that they may be out
of date.
thanks!
Stephen
--
Stephen Thompson Berkeley Seismological Laboratory
step...@seismo.berkeley.edu215
On 05/25/10 16:46, Dermot Beirne wrote:
> Hi,
> I got no response to my original question below, so I'll try once more.
> Does anyone know if the actual bconsole commands are logged
> anywhere. I'm trying to identify if a problem is a configuration issue
> or human error.
Dermot,
There is no comm
Hi,
I got no response to my original question below, so I'll try once more.
Does anyone know if the actual bconsole commands are logged
anywhere. I'm trying to identify if a problem is a configuration issue
or human error.
Thank you
Dermot.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dermot Be
On 24.05.2010 21:17, bacula-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Hello everyone:
> my problem is that I descarhe bacula-web and test it in correctly but it
> gives me FOLLOWING: error Error query: 4
> any ideas?
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
I am already using apache .htaccess file for login however i need users of
different levels. Example i have to clients in different locations doing
network backups to the same server, and would like to give them access to bweb.
However i do not want to allow them to view or even worse delete e
On 05/25/10 14:45, Jesse Angell wrote:
> I'm pretty sure my configuration is fine. It worked just fine on
> 3.0.3
>
> One interesting thing I just noticed --
>
> If I cancel all the backups and then start several (including one
> large one that takes about a day) it works fine. But after that
>
I'm pretty sure my configuration is fine. It worked just fine on 3.0.3
One interesting thing I just noticed --
If I cancel all the backups and then start several (including one large one
that takes about a day) it works fine. But after that large backup is running
for about 30 minutes - you c
Hi All,
I`ve installed following software:
bacula-mysql-5.0.2-1
bacula-mtx-5.0.2-1
bacula-updatedb-5.0.2-1
bacula-libs-5.0.2-1
using sg module for hp autoloader device, there have 8 cassettes by 800 GB for
everyone, in default pool all of them, labeled, working perfect:
mtx -f /dev/sg2 status
On 05/25/10 13:18, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> --- On Tue, 5/25/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>
>
>>
>> The 'Storage' section of bacula-dir.conf does not call out
>> individual
>> devices, just storage daemons. You should have the
>> Storage device
>> concurrency set both in bacula-sd.conf and bacula-
On 05/25/10 13:01, Jesse Angell wrote:
> I recently upgraded from Bacula 3.0.3 to 5.0.2. All of my backups go
> directly to disk. Quite often when multiple concurrent jobs try to run
> they'll stick on "is waiting for storage file". This never happened on
> 3.0.3. Any ideas?
First of all, c
--- On Tue, 5/25/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>
> The 'Storage' section of bacula-dir.conf does not call out
> individual
> devices, just storage daemons. You should have the
> Storage device
> concurrency set both in bacula-sd.conf and bacula-dir.conf,
> but, for the
> sake of constructive para
I recently upgraded from Bacula 3.0.3 to 5.0.2. All of my backups go directly
to disk. Quite often when multiple concurrent jobs try to run they'll stick on
"is waiting for storage file". This never happened on 3.0.3. Any ideas?
Director Output:
Running Jobs:
Console connected at 25-May-10 1
On 05/25/10 12:36, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> --- On Tue, 5/25/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> If you enter the console command 'update' with no
>> arguments, it will
>> give you a number of choices of what to update. 'Pool
>> from resource'
>> will be one of these (it should be the second, I think).
If life gives you lemons, keep them-- because hey.. free lemons.
--- On Tue, 5/25/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> From: Phil Stracchino
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula using volume for each job every night
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Tuesday, May 25, 2010, 10:22 AM
> On
On 05/25/10 12:04, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> I see how to "update all volumes from pool":
>
> http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/3972/updateallvolumesfrompoo.png
>
> But not sure how to "Update the Pool from the Resource". How is this done?
If you enter the console command 'update' with no argume
--- On Tue, 5/25/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> From: Phil Stracchino
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula using volume for each job every night
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Tuesday, May 25, 2010, 8:52 AM
> On 05/25/10 10:37, Joseph Spenner
> wrote:
> > Anyone have any ideas?
>
--- On Tue, 5/25/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> From: Phil Stracchino
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula using volume for each job every night
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Tuesday, May 25, 2010, 9:16 AM
> On 05/25/10 11:06, Joseph Spenner
> wrote:
> > I currently have 5 clien
If life gives you lemons, keep them-- because hey.. free lemons.
--- On Tue, 5/25/10, John Drescher wrote:
> From: John Drescher
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula using volume for each job every night
> To: "Joseph Spenner"
> Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Tuesday, May 25,
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Joseph Spenner wrote:
>
> If life gives you lemons, keep them-- because hey.. free lemons.
>
>
> --- On Tue, 5/25/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>
>> From: Phil Stracchino
>> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula using volume for each job every night
>> To: bacula-user
On 05/25/10 11:06, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> I currently have 5 clients.
>
> In my bacula-sd.conf, I have:
> Storage {
> Name = bacula-va-sd
> SDPort = 9103
> WorkingDirectory = "/opt/bacula/bin/working"
> Pid Directory = "/opt/bacula/bin/working"
> Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 20
> }
>
> De
If life gives you lemons, keep them-- because hey.. free lemons.
--- On Tue, 5/25/10, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> From: Phil Stracchino
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula using volume for each job every night
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Tuesday, May 25, 2010, 8:49 AM
> On
On Tuesday 25 May 2010 15:13:36 Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
> On 04.05.2010 / 13:33:12 -0400, Morty Abzug wrote:
> > However, format/architectural issues are indeed harder to overcome.
> > There are a number of limitations I have encountered with bacula, and
> > it looks like at least some of them migh
> The last few nights, bacula is using multiple volumes again. I had this
> problem once before and thought I fixed it. But apparently not. Here are my
> settings:
>
> # Default pool definition
> Pool {
> Name = Default
> Pool Type = Backup
> Recycle = yes
> AutoPrune = yes
> Job Retentio
On 05/25/10 10:37, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> Anyone have any ideas?
On, one other thing: After you updated your Pools, did you either
delete all your existing volumes, or update them all from the Pool?
(In case you didn't already know this, after you update a Pool resource,
you need to first updat
On 05/25/10 10:37, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> The last few nights, bacula is using multiple volumes again. I had this
> problem once before and thought I fixed it. But apparently not. Here are my
> settings:
>
> # Default pool definition
> Pool {
> Name = Default
> Pool Type = Backup
> Rec
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 05:13:36PM +0400, Anatoly Pugachev wrote:
> On 04.05.2010 / 13:33:12 -0400, Morty Abzug wrote:
> > (12) bconsole should support an option for execute-one-command (i.e. -e)
>
> how it is different from:
>
> echo list jobs | bconsole
>
> but I've tried to implement "-e " c
The last few nights, bacula is using multiple volumes again. I had this
problem once before and thought I fixed it. But apparently not. Here are my
settings:
# Default pool definition
Pool {
Name = Default
Pool Type = Backup
Recycle = yes
AutoPrune = yes
Job Retention = 20 days
Vo
I am getting anywhere from 4 to 40 M Bytes/second transfer rate.
sample from log (several lines omitted):
23-May 04:05 ip-bacula-sd JobId 3834: 3307 Issuing autochanger "unload slot
10, drive 0" command.
23-May 04:38 ip-bacula-sd JobId 3834: Job write elapsed time = 00:29:38,
Transfer rate = 21
On 04.05.2010 / 13:33:12 -0400, Morty Abzug wrote:
> However, format/architectural issues are indeed harder to overcome.
> There are a number of limitations I have encountered with bacula, and
> it looks like at least some of them might be fundamental to bacula's
> architecture. My list:
>
> (12)
On Wed, 19 May 2010 15:00:22 +0200, Foo wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2010 12:16:40 +0200, francisco javier funes nieto
> wrote:
>
>> 2010/5/19 Foo :
>>> May 18 17:17:49 DIRHOSTNAME bacula-sd: bsock.c:488 Packet size too big
>>> from "client:1.2.3.4:36643. Terminating connection.
>>
>> There is some
>
> Morty Abzug wrote:
>
> > This sort of problem is typical of a speed/duplex mismatch. That
is,
> > either your switch or your server is hardcoding the speed of your
> > network port, and the other end is using different settings.
>
> A lot of network admins still believe the best way to run
Brian Debelius wrote:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/24/hitach_maxell_perp_tape/
>
> Hitachi Maxell has demonstrated a 50TB capacity LTO-class tape using
> perpendicular magnetic recording technology. This is 400 per cent more
> than the raw capacity of the highest-capacity tape on the
Morty Abzug wrote:
> This sort of problem is typical of a speed/duplex mismatch. That is,
> either your switch or your server is hardcoding the speed of your
> network port, and the other end is using different settings.
A lot of network admins still believe the best way to run a network is
wit
Hello
Seems i have the directory:
u...@mypc:~$ sudo ls -la bacula/
total 16
drwxr-xr-x 4 user user 4096 2010-05-21 09:25 .
drwxr-xr-x 36 user user 4096 2010-05-25 09:38 ..
drwxr-xr-x 2 user user 4096 2010-05-21 09:25 bin
drwxrwx--- 2 root root 4096 2010-05-24 09:52 working
and its
37 matches
Mail list logo
