On 04.05.2010 / 13:33:12 -0400, Morty Abzug wrote: > However, format/architectural issues are indeed harder to overcome. > There are a number of limitations I have encountered with bacula, and > it looks like at least some of them might be fundamental to bacula's > architecture. My list: > > (12) bconsole should support an option for execute-one-command (i.e. -e)
how it is different from: echo list jobs | bconsole but I've tried to implement "-e " command line switch, it takes about 30 lines of code actually... > (13) bconsole should support an option for batch mode (i.e. -b) actually bconsole is always reading .bconsolerc file and you can put commands in it, but it's not a proper usage for a "batch mode". Writting a patch for batch mode should be no harder than my implementaion of "-e" command line. If anyone interested for a patch code review, I can push it to a SF git repository. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
