[Bacula-users] LTO-4 Drive issues

2010-05-22 Thread skipunk
I found another site showing the use of byte size and dd and after playing with it a bit i can hold 115 MB/s easy and backup my 3.5 GB file like nothing. I'm looking through Bacula documents, I don't recall if this can be set or not in the config files. +---

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-4 Drive issues

2010-05-22 Thread John Drescher
> I was not able to copy/backup files using tar. I may have been doing > something wrong. > > I had a job in progress using dd.  a 3.3Gb file which i started 40 min ago > and it's still running. > Check your dmesg output for errors. That is horribly slow. John -

[Bacula-users] LTO-4 Drive issues

2010-05-22 Thread skipunk
the backup finished with a speed of 1.3MB/s at little under an hour. +-- |This was sent by skip...@gmail.com via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com. +-

[Bacula-users] LTO-4 Drive issues

2010-05-22 Thread skipunk
I was not able to copy/backup files using tar. I may have been doing something wrong. I had a job in progress using dd. a 3.3Gb file which i started 40 min ago and it's still running. +-- |This was sent by skip...@gmail.com v

[Bacula-users] LTO-4 Drive issues

2010-05-22 Thread skipunk
I had ran the btape tests on Thursday when everything was setup and pushed 845G in a little over 2 hours avg speed of 102.7Mb/s I haven't tried doing the dd or tar test. I never tried that before, so I'm looking into what needs to be done to complete this task. The server is a Dell R200, I don

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-4 Drive issues

2010-05-22 Thread Richard Scobie
skipunk wrote: > Status update. I just finished the first backup job which was 3.6 Gb. It > took 2.5 hours to run. avg speeds finished around 500k/s. > > I've gone as far again to reboot the library and the server and still no > changes. I'm not sure what i'm over looking. I have 1T of data t

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-4 Drive issues

2010-05-22 Thread terryc
skipunk wrote: > Any suggestions would be appreciated. The other suggestions have suggested running the standard tests, You didn't say anything about hardware and I found that to be very important when I changed from DAT to DLT tapes, which initially ran just as glacial as the DAT. The first t

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-4 Drive issues

2010-05-22 Thread Ralf Gross
skipunk schrieb: > > Hoping someone could help me out. My department recently purchased > a Dell PowerVault TL2000 autochanger connected via SAS5. > > We are upgrading from a spectralogic AIT4 system. > > The sad part is the LTO-4 drive is running much slower than the AIT > system. I'm avg aro

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-4 Drive issues

2010-05-22 Thread James Harper
> Hi all, > > Hoping someone could help me out. My department recently purchased a Dell > PowerVault TL2000 autochanger connected via SAS5. > > We are upgrading from a spectralogic AIT4 system. > > The sad part is the LTO-4 drive is running much slower than the AIT system. > I'm avg around 714k

[Bacula-users] LTO-4 Drive issues

2010-05-22 Thread skipunk
Status update. I just finished the first backup job which was 3.6 Gb. It took 2.5 hours to run. avg speeds finished around 500k/s. I've gone as far again to reboot the library and the server and still no changes. I'm not sure what i'm over looking. I have 1T of data to backup on one of the

[Bacula-users] problem starting bat after upgrading to 5.0.2 from 5.0.1

2010-05-22 Thread Adolf Belka
I have upgraded from 5.0.1 to 5.0.2 No problems with the director, file or storage daemons. However when I try to start bat I get the following error message:- /usr/local/bacula/sbin/bat: error while loading shared libraries: libbaccfg-5.0.1.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or