On Wed, March 17, 2010 03:32, Jerry Lowry wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a new installation that I am tweeking the backups on. One of my
> backups goes through the firewall from an public ip address to where the
> backup server is on an private ip address. The backup works just fine
> for the first 2h 11
Hi,
On a bacula installation that I originally set up on a machine running
Debian "etch", everything was running smoothly.
Since etch has been EOL'ed, it was necessary to upgrade it, and we
recently did do an upgrade to lenny. This also involved an upgrade of
bacula from 1.38 (the version in etch
On 3/16/2010 7:02 PM, Brock Palen wrote:
> I have had running for about 1 hour
> estimate level=incremental job=xen1-host accurate=yes
>
> I wanted to test the accurate backup, what I see is MySQL using 100%
> cpu for a long time and never stops.
> I have enabled the slow query log on MySQL and I d
I have had running for about 1 hour
estimate level=incremental job=xen1-host accurate=yes
I wanted to test the accurate backup, what I see is MySQL using 100%
cpu for a long time and never stops.
I have enabled the slow query log on MySQL and I don't see anything
being added.
What kind of inf
Brock Palen schrieb:
> Is there a way to verify a volumes internal checksums against its data?
>
> Even better is there a way to have the catalog compare its checksums
> against the files in volumes? I know about the verify job but that
> appears to be only for the most recent job run. I wo
> True, but for anyone interested, there is working Gentoo ebuild for Bacula
> 5.0.1 here:
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302162
>
Thanks for pointing that out. I will have to see what is different
from the ebuild in my overlay..
John
-
Bob Cousins wrote:
> - Tape verification option -- verify that the bits read back from the
> tape are the same as those originally written. Spooling to disk makes
> this easier. Also, if a tape fails verification, it should be easy to
> restart the write/verify cycle with new media.
I used to do
On 16/03/2010 18:04, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 03/16/10 13:22, Richard Mortimer wrote:
>> On 16/03/2010 15:33, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>>> Yes, agreed. Unfortunately, 5.0.1 is not yet readily available on all
>>> platforms except by building from source. I was looking at this the
>>> other day
On 03/16/10 14:15, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Bob Cousins wrote:
>> - Explicit capturing of boot and partitioning information for easier
>> bare metal restores. (Bare metal restores should be easy and fast for
>> all OSes, but that is easier said than done.)
>
> Do you mean ba
Hi,
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Bob Cousins wrote:
> - Data staged to disk on the way to tape -- allowing backups to spool
> faster than tapes and when tape drives are full.
I'm pretty sure this already exists.
http://www.bacula.org/en/dev-manual/Data_Spooling.html
> - Explicit capturing of
> Yes, agreed. Unfortunately, 5.0.1 is not yet readily available on all
> platforms except by building from source. I was looking at this the
> other day to see whether it was feasible yet to upgrade all of my
> machines, and finding that (for example) Debian and Ubuntu still have
> no stable pac
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Bob Cousins wrote:
> The online documentation indicates that enhancement requests should be
> posted to this group. I'd like to see a small number of enhancements.
> Many of these have been mentioned before, so please just consider this
> comment a "Me Too!" to add
On 03/16/10 13:22, Richard Mortimer wrote:
> On 16/03/2010 15:33, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> Yes, agreed. Unfortunately, 5.0.1 is not yet readily available on all
>> platforms except by building from source. I was looking at this the
>> other day to see whether it was feasible yet to upgrade all o
Is there a way to verify a volumes internal checksums against its data?
Even better is there a way to have the catalog compare its checksums
against the files in volumes? I know about the verify job but that
appears to be only for the most recent job run. I would like to do
this as a type
Please pardon the Interruption. There isn't a way to post this for just folks
in the US.
LOPSA-NJ Professional IT Community Conference 2010
PICC10 is a gathering of professionals from the diverse IT (computer and
network administration) community in New Jersey to learn, share ideas, and
networ
The online documentation indicates that enhancement requests should be
posted to this group. I'd like to see a small number of enhancements.
Many of these have been mentioned before, so please just consider this
comment a "Me Too!" to add weight to those who decide what is next.
- Clean/automat
On 16/03/2010 15:33, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 03/16/10 11:09, John Drescher wrote:
>> On 03/16/10 10:30, Rodrigo Fernandes wrote:
>>> My backup server has the bacula version 2.4.4-1 installed via tar.gz in a
>>> Red Hat Enterprise Server 5.4 x86_64
>>
>> You should really upgrade to 5.0.1 if p
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:54 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Phil Stracchino
> wrote:
>> On 03/16/10 12:20, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>>> On 03/16/10 12:09, John Drescher wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Phil Stracchino
wrote:
> Odd ... I have
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 03/16/10 12:20, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> On 03/16/10 12:09, John Drescher wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Phil Stracchino
>>> wrote:
Odd ... I have your overlay loaded, and I see 5.0.0 but not 5.0.1
>>>
>>> I just
"Rodrigo Fernandes" kirjoitti viestissä
news:ed2736a51003160845t40d1e9edgf2ff6fa4b3278...@mail.gmail.com...
> John,
>
> The Fulls of the weekend are canceled because during the week I have more
> than 200 servers (with small volume data) running full backups. When the
> incremental backups of t
On 03/16/10 12:20, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 03/16/10 12:09, John Drescher wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Phil Stracchino
>> wrote:
>>> Odd ... I have your overlay loaded, and I see 5.0.0 but not 5.0.1
>>
>> I just pushed my changes 5 minutes ago.
>
> Ah! I'll run an eix-sync th
Hi,
I have a new installation that I am tweeking the backups on. One of my
backups goes through the firewall from an public ip address to where the
backup server is on an private ip address. The backup works just fine
for the first 2h 11m 15s and then it fails. After the first test failed
I
On 03/16/10 12:09, John Drescher wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Phil Stracchino
> wrote:
>> Odd ... I have your overlay loaded, and I see 5.0.0 but not 5.0.1
>
> I just pushed my changes 5 minutes ago.
Ah! I'll run an eix-sync then. That'll leave me covered on everything
but the
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 03/16/10 11:54, John Drescher wrote:
>>> Gentoo has nothing newer than 3.0.3 even in unstable.
>>> It seems to be an uphill struggle to keep all the various OS
>>> distributions up to date on Bacula.
>>>
>> I have an ebuild for 5.0.1 h
On 03/16/10 11:54, John Drescher wrote:
>> Gentoo has nothing newer than 3.0.3 even in unstable.
>> It seems to be an uphill struggle to keep all the various OS
>> distributions up to date on Bacula.
>>
> I have an ebuild for 5.0.1 here:
>
> http://github.com/drescherjm/jmdgentoooverlay/tree/mast
> Gentoo has nothing newer than 3.0.3 even in unstable.
> It seems to be an uphill struggle to keep all the various OS
> distributions up to date on Bacula.
>
I have an ebuild for 5.0.1 here:
http://github.com/drescherjm/jmdgentoooverlay/tree/master/app-backup/bacula/
This is pretty much just a
John,
The Fulls of the weekend are canceled because during the week I have more
than 200 servers (with small volume data) running full backups. When the
incremental backups of these servers starts during the weekend my bacula-sd
stop to responding (I'm using bconsole to check this) and my full job
Enable the firewall, so only the internal IP is allowed to accede that
server on those ports
Ciao
---
Carlo Filippetto
2010/3/16 Radosław Korzeniewski :
> Hello,
>
> Check if SD is listening on private network address, using telnet, for
> example - check from client (FD) machine. Next, check if
On 03/16/10 11:09, John Drescher wrote:
> On 03/16/10 10:30, Rodrigo Fernandes wrote:
>> My backup server has the bacula version 2.4.4-1 installed via tar.gz in a
>> Red Hat Enterprise Server 5.4 x86_64
>
> You should really upgrade to 5.0.1 if possible.
Yes, agreed. Unfortunately, 5.0.1 is not
On 03/16/10 10:30, Rodrigo Fernandes wrote:
> It's really necessary to create more than 1 bacula-fd to control the
> jobs? (How can I do that. I can use any port?). I think to set the "Max
> Concurrent Jobs" in bacula-dir and bacula-fd to 100 and limit the "Max
> Concurrent Jobs" in bacula-sd to th
> I wonder if someone on the list have knowledge about how to climb the bacula
> to backup over 200 servers? It´s is possible?
>
Yes of course. Other bacula users on the list do that. I have heard
reports of 1000 machines being backed up by bacula.
> Currently, my "Max Concurrent Jobs" on Bacula
Hello,
Check if SD is listening on private network address, using telnet, for
example - check from client (FD) machine. Next, check if Bacula SD
configuration uses private address (on private network) instead of public.
And finally check communication from FD to SD using traceroute and private
SD
Hello,
Can I expect a server installation of bacula in version 5.0.1 for Win32 ?
When I start the install only client installation is possible.
There is a release date of Win32 server installation in 5.0.1 ?
Or have I to compile source with cygwin ?
POMMIER Emmanuel
Responsable Infrastru
I wonder if someone on the list have knowledge about how to climb the bacula
to backup over 200 servers? It´s is possible?
Currently, my "Max Concurrent Jobs" on Bacula-dir, bacula-fd is equal to 60
and bacula-sd is equal to 10.
I have 50 servers that run the full backup over the weekend (due to
Am Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:16:19 -0500 schrieb Sean Carolan:
> Due to disk space limitations I would like to re-use the same volumes
> each week for a single full backup. Every time I try to run a new job,
> I get an error stating that bacula cannot find any append-able volumes.
> It has been over s
Hi,
i have new bacula 5.0.1 (new installation) and problem with canceled jobs. From
50 Clients a few don't finish a job (from console command run and Schedule). On
bacula 2.4.4 on the same configuration all was ok. My OS is debian and gentoo.
Logs from job:
rysio-dir Start Backup JobId 54, Job=z
Hello
But you can see client status on bconsole??
Please, type on bconsole "status client=client-fd" and show us the result
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 6:55 PM, daveb93 wrote:
>
> Hello All ...
> This is my first post here (but likely not the last :D ) I manage several
> bacula installs all with sha
Hello all,
I have a problem to understandhow to configure bacula to make
backups on different network interfaces.
My config:
- backuped server (server1) with 2 network cards, one for internet traffic
(public IP), one for backups (private IP).
- bacula server (2.4 on debian) with 2 network
Am 15.3.2010 18:02, schrieb Jari Fredriksson:
> On 15.3.2010 13:02, Administrator wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> somebody pointed me to shell scripting bacula in order to mark all
>> volumes used. Long users of bacula will certainly not find this helpfull
>> but well .. hopefully this is not starting a rele
Hi Guys,
I'm experiencing a weird problem with my incremental backups of file server
data residing on a SLES 9 Samba server. I'm running the Bacula services on a
CentOS 5.4 box, version 3.0.2.
My full backup is around 600 GB after compression and this runs fine. The first
incremental or diffe
Take a look here:
http://www.bacula.org/en/dev-manual/Bacula_TLS_Communication.html
(search for "Self-signed Cerftificate").
I´m not sure if "TLS Verify Peer" would work in your situation (since CA
= Your-Server?). However if everything else is right (bacula-sd?) I
guess it should work if you c
41 matches
Mail list logo
