Dear Russel, after a check I've found that bacula > 2.2.7 use sqlite 3 no more
sqlite 2
**
* SQLite Upgrade *
**
For users of the sqlite package, from 2.2.7 onward sqlite3 replaces
sqlite2. Your sqlite2 database file (/var/lib/bacula/bacula.db) is not
compatible w
> In theory, the latency from random IO should be much closer to zero on a
> flash drive than on a thrashing hard drive, so I was hoping I might need
> only 1 or two 64GB or 128GB flash drives to provide decent spool size,
> perhaps not even raid-ed.
>
> In addition, SSD/flash drives should be sile
>
> Hi,
> Can I install Bacula server under windows xp?
> There is any manual?
>
I have run bacula-dir and bacula-sd under Windows Small Business Server
2008 (SBS 2k8 is 64 bit only) and it worked but I had to mess with the
install a bit as the -dir and -sd are 32 bit but the -fd has to be the
6
Hi,
Can I install Bacula server under windows xp?
There is any manual?
Thanks.
Boni
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Bacula-server-under-windows-tp24601736p24601736.html
Sent from the Bacula - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
We have had good look with the Overland Neo 2000 but they have bigger tape
libraries as well and you can get them with LTO3 and LTO4 drives.
I think pretty much anything that supports mtx or mt commands is compatible
with Bacula, of course anyone more knowledgeable than me may know more about
Morning,
Currently I am not required to enter a password to get into bconsole
for restores and such. Is there a way to turn on requiring a password to
bconsole (and the other b utilities) or do I need to hack the source?
Mike
--
Trying to get bacula up for the first time, but it seems to just not
work - specifically bconsole is unable to connect to bacula-dir. I've
double and triple checked that the password are all the same as the FAQ
suggests, no luck; and if the passwords don't agree, why wouldn't it
just find that out
James Harper wrote:
> I'd hazard a guess that for spooling, raw throughput is more important
> than random access seek time, unless you spool is fragmented.
You arte correct - IF you're only spooling one backup.
I may have anything up to 6 running simultaneously, some people on this
list have m
Hello,
first excuse my English, I'm french.
I'm new on the mailing list, and i have a question.
My config:
bacula server: Debian Lenny / bacula 2.4.3
bacula client: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.3 / bacula 2.4.4
I have several file system backuped and everything work fine.
I try "file d
2009/7/23 Eduardo Sieber :
> Hello people!
> We're thinking about buy a LTO3 Power Vault 124t solution.
> But the question is, Can power Vault 124t work with bacula? Bacula web site
> says that the PV12t LTO 2 is compatible, but is the same valid for LTO3?
>
>
>
> Thank You!
>
Assuming your OS ca
Hello people!
We're thinking about buy a LTO3 Power Vault 124t solution.
But the question is, Can power Vault 124t work with bacula? Bacula web site
says that the PV12t LTO 2 is compatible, but is the same valid for LTO3?
Thank You!
---
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Jeronimo Zucco wrote:
> I did'nt find how to do that. I've tried to change the order of my
> Jobs directive and Client in bacula-dir.conf, but without efect. My
> question is:
>
> How bacula determine order of execution of scheduled jobs with use the
> same schedule ? Is it ba
Hi all,
I have succesfully installed bacula 3.0.2 on a ubuntu 8.0.4.
The only problem is that when I look at the Director Status in webmin,
nothing appear. I check with the bconsole and with a command status all, and
I have no errors, I can see all the jobs I have made in test, all the jobs
that
I forgot to mention of priority detail. I'm using the same priority,
because of concurrent jobs. I'm running 4 concurrent jobs, and if I
change the priority, one priority have to finish all the jobs to start
other priority. This is not what I want to do, I want running
concurrent jobs, but
Jeronimo Zucco wrote on 23.07.2009 15:41:55:
> Jeronimo Zucco
> 23.07.2009 15:41
>
> An
>
> bacula-users
>
> Kopie
>
> Thema
>
> [Bacula-users] Execution order of scheduled jobs
>
>
> Hi, list.
>
> I'm using bacula 3.0.X with mysql database. My settings of diary
> backups using the sa
Not a problem! Glad my little journal helped someone out :-) I need to add
to the wiki here one of these days. Just finished doing a BMR on a windows
XP machine with a custom System Rescue CD containing the bacula-fd. I think
I have a few more tricks in my little book.
~Jayson Broughton
-
Hi, list.
I'm using bacula 3.0.X with mysql database. My settings of diary
backups using the same schedule (it starts all backups on the same
time), but I want to run the scheduled backups in a pre-determinated
order.
Example: my backups of 20 clients starts at 00:10, but I want run
host
>
> So far the only units which appear to be worthwhile for spool use are
> Samsung and Intel's enterprise SSDs with Intel having a clear
performance
> edge over time.
>
> I suspect that the sheer performance gains from zero seek time would
> far outweigh any slowdown seen in SSDs.
>
I'd hazard
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Bob Hetzel wrote:
>
> Has anybody tinkered around with spooling backups on an SSD (aka solid
> state drive) or a raid-0 pair of them for higher performance?
No, but it's on my TODO list (Trying to wrangle budget for them)
> It would seem that the issue of latency introduced
19 matches
Mail list logo
