Re: [Bacula-users] Two EOF

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Simmons wrote: >> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:45:17 +0200, SZÉKELYI Szabolcs said: >> Hi, >> >> We configured our tape storage with >> >> Two EOF = Yes >> BSF at EOM = Yes >> >> and found that this works fine as long as the tape is not ejected an

[Bacula-users] Python integration & laptops

hi everybody, in my office bacula is running and backup all my server and desktops every night and i'm happy, but not the laptops. why not the laptops ? because often they miss. In my first attempt i configured the job with reschedule on Error for 23 hour every 30 minute: - most times i got an

[Bacula-users] bacula-bat install problem

Builds fine, but look: app1# make install ===> Installing for bacula-bat-3.0.0_1 ===> bacula-bat-3.0.0_1 depends on package: qt4-qmake>=4.4.3 - found ===> bacula-bat-3.0.0_1 depends on package: qt4-uic>=4.4.3 - found ===> bacula-bat-3.0.0_1 depends on package: qt4-moc>=4.4.3 - found ===>

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-bat install problem

Forgot to mention: FreeBSD app1.xyz.com 7.1-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE-p5 #0: Thu Apr 30 13:06:33 EDT 2009 r...@app1.xyz.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PAE i386 -- Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performanc

Re: [Bacula-users] minimizing full backups

On piątek, 1 maja 2009 13:22:55 Silver Salonen wrote: > > But I thought of the other-way approach when writing the original e-mail - > what if I only include new files, not exclude old files? And when I ran a > job with such a fileset, it took only minutes. I'll test this approach and > see whether

Re: [Bacula-users] 100% static linked bacula-sd

> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:46:51 +0200, Bastian Schern said: > > Hallo everybody, > > I try to install the Bacula Storage Daemon (bacula-sd) v3.0.1 directly > on a Linux NAS. > > I used the following configure command to build the static linked binary: > ./configure --disable-build-dird --ena

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape MTEOM error with Dell TL2000 (IBM TS3100)

> Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:47:46 +0200 > From: yvan > Subject: [Bacula-users] Tape MTEOM error with Dell TL2000 (IBM TS3100) > To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Message-ID: <49f9ba12.2070...@skywalker.is-a-chef.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Re: [Bacula-users] minimizing full backups

On Thursday 30 April 2009 18:29:20 Kevin Keane wrote: > Silver Salonen wrote: > > Hello. > > > > As keeping multiple full backups of the whole data is a very expensive task, I > > think it's wise to minimize the size of full backups. The simple idea for > > doing that is to separate files/folder

[Bacula-users] OOM with `accurate' mode

Hi all I'm wondering if there's any way to limit the memory used by `accurate' mode - say, by spooling the required data to an mmap()ped file instead of an in-memory block, or handling it in chunks. I just had a server with 2GB of RAM, most of which was free, go OOM because Bacula ate 1.5GB of R

Re: [Bacula-users] Two EOF

> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:45:17 +0200, SZÉKELYI Szabolcs said: > > Hi, > > We configured our tape storage with > > Two EOF = Yes > BSF at EOM = Yes > > and found that this works fine as long as the tape is not ejected and > reloaded. After that, Bacula complains about number of files on the

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape MTEOM error with Dell TL2000 (IBM TS3100)

Hello, thank you for your help. I've seen your post googling for my problem, but I don't think it's a reboot problem of the autochanger here, because I didn't reboot the autochanger since weeks, and I put 10 new tapes into it, that all turn out with this MTEOM problem as soon I put a 2nd backup