Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> On Wednesday, 25 March 2009 22:52:03 -0400,
> John Drescher wrote:
>
>
So the tapes can only be manually recycle must be 'Recycle = no' in
the pool definition and that flag 'recycled' in each volume must be
zero?
>
>
>>> AutoPrune = no
>>>
When you do massive inserts into a database, it is often a good idea to
drop the indexes on that database, do the insert, and then recreate the
indexes.
mehma sarja wrote:
>
> MY SITUATION
>
> I can take your Megabytes and shame you with my 9,868,868 mostly
> Maildir files and 690.8 GB space th
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> I was reading the 'catalog maintenance' chapter in order to understand a
> little more on the operation of File Retention and Job Retention. But
> something is not to me clear still. Beyond what is due to maintain the
> rule File Retention < Job Retention < Volume Retention,
2009/3/28 Daniel Bareiro :
> On Wednesday, 25 March 2009 22:52:03 -0400,
> John Drescher wrote:
>
>> >> So the tapes can only be manually recycle must be 'Recycle = no' in
>> >> the pool definition and that flag 'recycled' in each volume must be
>> >> zero?
>
>> > AutoPrune = no
>> > Recycle = no
>
On Wednesday, 25 March 2009 22:52:03 -0400,
John Drescher wrote:
> >> So the tapes can only be manually recycle must be 'Recycle = no' in
> >> the pool definition and that flag 'recycled' in each volume must be
> >> zero?
> > AutoPrune = no
> > Recycle = no
> > In the pool should be enough.
> > h
MY SITUATION
I can take your Megabytes and shame you with my 9,868,868 mostly Maildir
files and 690.8 GB space they take up. Take that! It took 25 hours to
transfer and is currently "indexing." Before I ramble on, here is some
confguration info:
CONFIGURATION
dir Version: 2.4.2 (26 July 2008), a
Hi Kevin.
On Wednesday, 25 March 2009 20:08:01 -0700,
Kevin Keane wrote:
> If you want tapes around forever, I think your best bet is to change
> the retention time in the pool to, say, ten years (I'm not sure if you
> can do an infinite retention time off the top of my head). Usually, if
> bacul
The short answer: bacula actually is doing the right thing here.
The long answer:
"Different filesystem" means that the directory is not at that place in
the file system, but rather mounted as a Windows join (roughly the
Windows equivalent of a Linux symbolic link or a mount). There are three
Hello,
I wanted to ask what will happen with in this scenario:
1. I create volume1 for incremental pool with retension 20d
2. the volume1 is appended retension ends and then is recycled and moved to
pool Scratch
3. In pool differential (retension period 40d) all volumes are marked full so
bacul
Paul Hanson schrieb:
> Currently we have an IBM TS3200 working very well over fibre channel and
> has two Ultrium 4 tape units. If I set concurrency to two (2) then both
> tape units can work fine. However, if only one tape unit is in operation
> and two jobs start for the SAME tape pool, then the
Currently we have an IBM TS3200 working very well over fibre channel and
has two Ultrium 4 tape units. If I set concurrency to two (2) then both
tape units can work fine. However, if only one tape unit is in operation
and two jobs start for the SAME tape pool, then the jobs are interlaced
and I wou
11 matches
Mail list logo
