The instructions for creating a rescue CD after
having installed Bacula as an RPM say you can run "make"
(i.e., without having to run configure first).
But the RPM does not install any Makefiles, only
several Makefile.in files.
--
Blake Dunlap schrieb:
> Yes, concurrency has been working for some time, and it does
> initially start 5 concurrent jobs, but it does not start another job
> when one finishes, it waits till all 5 jobs have finished to start 5
> more simultaneous jobs.
>
> And yes, they are all the same priority.
Yes, concurrency has been working for some time, and it does initially start 5
concurrent jobs, but it does not start another job when one finishes, it waits
till all 5 jobs have finished to start 5 more simultaneous jobs.
And yes, they are all the same priority.
On a side note, I apologize for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Drescher wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2007 2:43 PM, Blake Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After watching it run now for a few days, it definitely appears to not be
starting new jobs until all of the jobs running on the sd finish. Is this
ho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Langille wrote:
> Not so long ago, we established that Bacula will work with PostgreSQL > 7.4
> and MySQL > 4.1. At present, these versions are defined only at:
>
> http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/Installi_Configur_PostgreS.html
> http://www.ba
> Yes I use spooling, to a nice speedy raid 0.
>
Same here with my LTO2 autoloader.
I don't have any more ideas at the moment on how to solve this but
hopefully someone else can help...
John
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> I do not see anything that looks wrong. Are you using spooling? I use
> spooling with most clients except a few jobs that originate on the
> director or the storage machines.
> John
Yes I use spooling, to a nice speedy raid 0.
---
On Dec 4, 2007 2:43 PM, Blake Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> After watching it run now for a few days, it definitely appears to not be
> >> starting new jobs until all of the jobs running on the sd finish. Is this
> >> how it is supposed to work?
> >>
> >No. Can you post your configs. I am
>> After watching it run now for a few days, it definitely appears to not be
>> starting new jobs until all of the jobs running on the sd finish. Is this
>> how it is supposed to work?
>>
>No. Can you post your configs. I am using bacula-2.3.6 for the
>director and storage and several different ver
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 20:17 +, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 10:51:00 -0800, Ross Boylan said:
> >
> > Clarifying:
> > On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 09:18 -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > > I have a BACULA job that runs a SHELL script; the script does an sudo and
> > > it appears
> >
John Drescher schrieb:
> > I find this behavior odd, and counter-intuitive. I feel that Bacula
> > should honor the retention times that I have configured.
> >
> It will as long as you do not have other appendable tapes in the pool
> that the backup is running. Putting all new tapes in the Scratch
> After watching it run now for a few days, it definitely appears to not be
> starting new jobs until all of the jobs running on the sd finish. Is this
> how it is supposed to work?
>
No. Can you post your configs. I am using bacula-2.3.6 for the
director and storage and several different versions
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> Danny Butroyd wrote:
> > Hi Guys
>
> > I'm not sure if this has been answered fully in the past (searching
> > through the archives did not help).
I obviously wasn't as thorough as I should have been :(
>
> > I upgraded bacula from 1.38.x to 2.x and duly updated the da
After watching it run now for a few days, it definitely appears to not be
starting new jobs until all of the jobs running on the sd finish. Is this how
it is supposed to work?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blake Dunlap
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 1:20 AM
T
> I find this behavior odd, and counter-intuitive. I feel that Bacula
> should honor the retention times that I have configured.
>
It will as long as you do not have other appendable tapes in the pool
that the backup is running. Putting all new tapes in the Scratch pool
makes it run the way you wo
Ralf Gross wrote:
> Luis Cañas Díaz schrieb:
>
>> I've have a doubt about purged volumes in Bacula. I've been working with
>> Bacula the last months without any problem, but now I'm realising that
>> I'm running out without free volumes in my Pool.
>>
>> The retention period has been set to 2 mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Danny Butroyd wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> I'm not sure if this has been answered fully in the past (searching
> through the archives did not help).
>
> I upgraded bacula from 1.38.x to 2.x and duly updated the database and
> everything seems to work fin
Hi Guys
I'm not sure if this has been answered fully in the past (searching
through the archives did not help).
I upgraded bacula from 1.38.x to 2.x and duly updated the database and
everything seems to work fine but every now and again the backup craps
out with "Table 'bacula.batch' doesn't
Luis Cañas Díaz schrieb:
> I've have a doubt about purged volumes in Bacula. I've been working with
> Bacula the last months without any problem, but now I'm realising that
> I'm running out without free volumes in my Pool.
>
> The retention period has been set to 2 months and the maximal number o
> On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 10:11:25 +0100, le dahut said:
>
> It returns me this :
> """
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# sysctl net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range
> net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = 3276861000
> """
Ah, that looks OK.
> What do you mean with "you have configured the machine like that" ?
If n
Hi all,
I've have a doubt about purged volumes in Bacula. I've been working with
Bacula the last months without any problem, but now I'm realising that
I'm running out without free volumes in my Pool.
The retention period has been set to 2 months and the maximal number of
volumes was reached. Howe
It returns me this :
"""
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# sysctl net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range
net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = 3276861000
"""
What do you mean with "you have configured the machine like that" ?
Martin Simmons a écrit :
>> On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:06:15 +0100, le dahut said:
>> Hello
>> I
22 matches
Mail list logo
