[Bacula-users] 2.2.6 RPM Release Bad Key

2007-11-11 Thread Scott Ruckh
I am receiving the following errors: rpm -ihv bacula-2.2.6-1.src.rpm error: bacula-2.2.6-1.src.rpm: V3 DSA signature: BAD, key ID 10a792ad error: bacula-2.2.6-1.src.rpm cannot be installed I believe I have imported the Felix Schwartz key and the bacula public key installed. Any suggestions? --

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] 2.2.6 rpm release

2007-11-11 Thread Kern Sibbald
Nice and fast work Scott. Thanks, Kern On Sunday 11 November 2007 21:40, Scott Barninger wrote: > Hello, > > bacula-2.2.6 has been released to sourceforge. This release should > address the RedHat (and clone) issues discussed recently as well as > introducing support for SuSE 10.3. > > The follo

Re: [Bacula-users] How would you handle this backup scheme?

2007-11-11 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 11.11.2007 22:17,, RXWatcher wrote:: > I want to have Full backups and backup my full machine but have the > incrementals and the differentials skip one large file. I was trying to have > one fileset that would cover this. Is this possible? Not easily... you could, for example, use a script t

[Bacula-users] How would you handle this backup scheme?

2007-11-11 Thread RXWatcher
I want to have Full backups and backup my full machine but have the incrementals and the differentials skip one large file. I was trying to have one fileset that would cover this. Is this possible? Or should I try to do something like backup that file with another fileset/job and just have it exc

[Bacula-users] 2.2.6 rpm release

2007-11-11 Thread Scott Barninger
Hello, bacula-2.2.6 has been released to sourceforge. This release should address the RedHat (and clone) issues discussed recently as well as introducing support for SuSE 10.3. The following issues have been corrected: * Sun Nov 11 2007 - add new files required by rescue makefile * Sat Nov 10 2

Re: [Bacula-users] Amazon S3 service

2007-11-11 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 11.11.2007 18:10,, Bill Merriam wrote:: > Has anyone looks at using Amazon's S3 service with Bacula? I was > thinking of something along the line of migrating from local disk based > backups to S3 for longer term storage. If you wanted to do something like that, some hints: - treat the stora

[Bacula-users] Amazon S3 service

2007-11-11 Thread Bill Merriam
Has anyone looks at using Amazon's S3 service with Bacula? I was thinking of something along the line of migrating from local disk based backups to S3 for longer term storage. Bill - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk

[Bacula-users] Bacula 2.2.6 Source + win32 binaries released to Source Forge

2007-11-11 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, I have released the Bacula 2.2.6 source tar files and the Win32 binaries to Source Forge. This release is a minor bug update to version 2.2.5. Version 2.2.6 is a minor bug fix realease to version 2.2.5 - It fixes bugs: #1003, 942, 982, 990(response only), 991, 993, 986, 976. - Fix bat

Re: [Bacula-users] different versions interaction

2007-11-11 Thread Michael Short
I'm using Director/Storage 2.2.5 and File daemons 2.0.3 together and they seem to be working just fine. Sincerely, -Michael - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems?

Re: [Bacula-users] can't restore ACL of /tmp/bacula-restores/*

2007-11-11 Thread Marc Cousin
> >> Bacula 2.2.5 and PGSQL 7.4.18. I am seeing the same errors on another > >> FreeBSD 6.2 machine with Bacula 2.2.5 and PGSQL 8.0.14 > > I'm not sure which version of PostgreSQL is required for the batch > inserts. I coldn't find that in the ReleaseNotes, but there was a > discussion on the mail

[Bacula-users] different versions interaction

2007-11-11 Thread Jason Joines
I'm using Bacula 2.2.5 on Linux for my director. In addition to Linux I also need to back up windows and os x machines. The latest version of the file daemon from Fink is 2.0.3. Will the version difference cause any issues? Jason Joines = This message was s

Re: [Bacula-users] can't restore ACL of /tmp/bacula-restores/*

2007-11-11 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, 09.11.2007 18:04,, Doug Sampson wrote:: ... >> The file system on this FreeBSD machine is UFS2. Default file >> system as with >> all FreeBSD machines. So it isn't the ZFS file system, what >> is causing these >> errors? >> > > I haven't heard anything on this issue thus far. Anybody? O