-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is wpkg free, BTW? I realize we're a little off-topic at this point.
Jeff Richards wrote:
> For what it's worth I use VSS, NTBackup, and USMT to give myself the
> most flexibility with restores. I also used setacl when I had to
> restore a XP Home ba
This could be related to the bacula-sd failures I've been seeing.
--- Forwarded message follows ---
Date sent: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 04:59:41 +0200
From: Marc Schiffbauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bacula Users
Subject:[Bacula-use
On 13 Sep 2007 at 11:54, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:11:21 +0200, Michael Patzer said:
> >
> > i used the test-option to test my new configuration before reloading,
> > but since 2.2.3 it seems broken..
> >
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] bacula# bacula-dir --help
> > bacula-
On 15 Sep 2007 at 4:59, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with one of my SD's.
>
> Since upgrade from 2.0.3 to 2.2.3 it is always segfaulting when a
> job starts to use it.
I suggest upgrading to 2.2.4 released today, and check the release
notes (see announce mailing list) for
Hi,
I have a problem with one of my SD's.
Since upgrade from 2.0.3 to 2.2.3 it is always segfaulting when a
job starts to use it.
-> SD startup
-> job starts
-> Tape is being requestet
-> mount
-> SD positions tape
-> kaboom
Device status:
Device "DLT8000" (/dev/nst0) is not open.
Device i
For what it's worth I use VSS, NTBackup, and USMT to give myself the most
flexibility with restores. I also used setacl when I had to restore a XP Home
backup into a XP Pro installation (just user data). Later I played with wpkg
for automatic software installation, etc. so I can install a base
Hello,
This is just to let you know that after sending out the 2.2.4 announcement, I
got back 32 bounces, which means that 32 accounts on the bacula-announce list
were disactivated.
This clearly seems to be some sort of a bug, because I cannot imagine 32
accounts having problems ...
I'll repo
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 08:27:47PM +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 14.09.2007 20:21,, Frank Sweetser wrote::
> > Arno Lehmann wrote:
> >
> >> Whatever you like... For these purposes - well-defined usage, and the
> >> clients need to be set up for this particular server anyway - I think
> >
Salutations,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 08:16:25PM +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 14.09.2007 18:09,, Mike Mestnik wrote::
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:57:27PM +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> ...
> >> Interesting setup... I assume this is to provide some sort of secure
> >> communication, simil
On 14 Sep 2007 at 21:09, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> This is to announce that I have released Bacula 2.2.4 source tar files and
> the
> Win32 binaries to the bacula and Win32 download sections of Source Forge.
Bacula 2.2.4 has been committed to the FreeBSD Ports tree.
--
Dan Langille - http://www.l
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:28:26 +0300, Yuri Timofeev said:
>
> Hi, there.
>
>
> There is a structure of directories:
>
> find /tmp/test/
>
> /tmp/test/
> /tmp/test/a2
> /tmp/test/a2/2
> /tmp/test/a2/2/test_file
> /tmp/test/a2/test_file
> /tmp/test/a2/1
> /tmp/test/a2/1/test_file
> /tmp/test
* John Drescher [20070911 19:59]:
> On 9/11/07, Dimitrios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:17:38 -0400 "John Drescher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > What version of bacula?
> >
> > v2.2.3 i believe (windows installer, downloaded from sourceforge).
> >
> If I do inde
Hello,
This is to announce that I have released Bacula 2.2.4 source tar files and the
Win32 binaries to the bacula and Win32 download sections of Source Forge.
This is what I would call a minor bug fix update to 2.2.3, but it has a good
number of minor problems and bugs fixed thanks to a lot of
> > > The related
> > > problem is how Bacula handles multiple locations where the file can be
> > > found, and how Bacula prioritizes restores. I have some interesting
> > > ideas on that when/if Kern gets time to think about the design for
> > > this
> > > stuff.
> >
> > That certainly seems like
Hi,
14.09.2007 20:21,, Frank Sweetser wrote::
> Arno Lehmann wrote:
>
>> Whatever you like... For these purposes - well-defined usage, and the
>> clients need to be set up for this particular server anyway - I think
>> self-signed certificates are absolutely ok. Of course, if you already
>
>
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Whatever you like... For these purposes - well-defined usage, and the
> clients need to be set up for this particular server anyway - I think
> self-signed certificates are absolutely ok. Of course, if you already
Nope - I found out while setting it up that Bacula will no
Hi,
14.09.2007 18:09,, Mike Mestnik wrote::
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:57:27PM +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
...
>> Interesting setup... I assume this is to provide some sort of secure
>> communication, similar to what (earlier, for Bacula) was done using
>> stunnel or could be achieved both by u
I don't know if this is the right place but I want to say thanks to the whole
team for this great software!
Yesterday I upgraded all the Baculas of the servers in a really flawless
process!, all compiled from source. I'm using OpenSUSE (10.0 - 10.2) in all
the equipments and a 8xLTO3 changer.
I
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:57:27PM +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 13.09.2007 22:14,, root wrote::
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 09:44:25PM +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> > Thank you for taking the time to reply.
> >
> >> 13.09.2007 20:59,, Mike Mestnik wrote::
> >>>
> >>> I'll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm not under the impression that anything changed with Max Wait Time
anyway.
Christian Sakshaug wrote:
> You have probability right, RelaseNotes file :)
>
> But I cannot se anything about "Max Wait Time", only perhaps.
>
> "- New Client Connect Wai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think it depends on what you're trying to backup. I'm not really a
Windows backup person, but my understanding is that NTBackup is better
at writing out what it calls a "system state" than other ways. Perhaps
if you never intend to need to restore th
You have probability right, RelaseNotes file :)
But I cannot se anything about "Max Wait Time", only perhaps.
"- New Client Connect Wait directive in Storage daemon so that
users can configure how long SD waits for FD connection."
Anyway, it works :-)
Regards,
Christian Sakshaug
Ryan Novo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I imagine a copy gets installed someplace when you install Bacula. I'd
put it wherever I found it after install. Does that not work?
Jeff K wrote:
> I am using Windows Vista on one PC on my LAN as a client. My server is a
> Debian Linux box.
>
> Wher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Sakshaug wrote:
> Good morning
>
> It seems like everything is just fine again. Last night I removed the
> "Max Wait Time" from the job resource and everything works again (every
> job is OK).
>
> I have probably used the "Max Wait Time"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have set up a bacula 2.0.3 server with an autochanger and several clients.
> My default pool directs to the tape. So my backup lasts a long time because
> all clients have to wait whil one client makes his backup. To speed up the
> backup I consider to creat
I just wanted to reassure myself:
If I use VSS I don't need ntbackup or regedit /e or something like that.
Is that correct?
Yours sincerely,
Eric Böse-Wolf
pgpmnXE0UcYKH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
This SF.net email i
On Friday 14 September 2007 01:51:25 Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is to let you know that I have finished packaging Bacula 2.2.3
> for the following distros:
>
> * Debian sarge (i386)
> * Debian etch (i386 and amd64)
> * Ubuntu edgy (i386 and amd64)
> * Ubuntu feisty (i386 and amd64)
Maybe it's better to write a seperate job and do a full backup
on that folder each time.
--
Das Briefgeheimnis sowie das Post- und Fernmeldegeheimnis sind
unverletzlich. (Grundgesetz, Artikel 10, Abs. 1)
http://www.gnupp.de http://www.gnupg.org
http://www.stud.u
On Friday 14 September 2007 11:07, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> * Kern Sibbald schrieb am 14.09.07 um 10:00 Uhr:
> > On Friday 14 September 2007 01:51, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > this is to let you know that I have finished packaging Bacula 2.2.3
> > > for the following distros:
Hi,
14.09.2007 11:26,, Achim Stumpf wrote::
> Hi list,
>
> I am new to bacula. I have searched already the list and had a look into
> the manual. But before I start to install bacula and test it for our
> purposes, I need an answer to the following question:
>
> I am working in a quite big dat
Hi list,
I am new to bacula. I have searched already the list and had a look into
the manual. But before I start to install bacula and test it for our
purposes, I need an answer to the following question:
I am working in a quite big data center, and we have a very old self
programmed perl scri
* Kern Sibbald schrieb am 14.09.07 um 10:00 Uhr:
> On Friday 14 September 2007 01:51, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this is to let you know that I have finished packaging Bacula 2.2.3
> > for the following distros:
> >
> > * Debian sarge (i386)
> > * Debian etch (i386 and amd64)
> > *
On Friday 14 September 2007 01:51, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is to let you know that I have finished packaging Bacula 2.2.3
> for the following distros:
>
> * Debian sarge (i386)
> * Debian etch (i386 and amd64)
> * Ubuntu edgy (i386 and amd64)
> * Ubuntu feisty (i386 and amd64)
>
Hi!
I have set up a bacula 2.0.3 server with an autochanger and several clients. My
default pool directs to the tape. So my backup lasts a long time because all
clients have to wait whil one client makes his backup. To speed up the backup I
consider to create an additional disk pool as a defaul
34 matches
Mail list logo
