A couple of weeks ago, a problem started cropping up. Jobs started failing
with what look like network errors:
02-Jun 01:10 lorien-sd: gkar-daily.2007-06-02_01.05.02 Fatal error:
append.c:259 Network error on data channel. ERR=Input/output error
02-Jun 01:10 lorien-sd: Job write elapsed time = 0
Hello Kern,
- If I did not cc the list last time, this was only because you send
me a private mail and I did not feel free to make it contents public.
>From now, I DO copy the lists.
- For the 'security restrictions' I was just thinking about the
listserver blocking any attachement to prevent th
On 6/1/07, Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Thanks for your response, and to the other folks.
> >
> > Storage {
> > Name = DellTL4000
> > Description = "Dell TL4000 Tape Library"
> > Address = 10.1.1.100 # N.B. Use a fully qualified name here
> > SDPort = 9103
>
Hi,
On 6/1/2007 7:04 PM, velociraptor wrote:
> I'm having a weird problem with my tests of bacula for our install.
>
> For the most part everything was going well--my autochanger tests fine
> using btape as do the individual tapes drives, basic job defs, clients
> on two different OSes (Gentoo &
Hi,
On 6/1/2007 6:28 PM, Doug Breshears wrote:
> Arno Lehmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 5/31/2007 8:26 PM, Doug Breshears wrote:
>>
>>> I decided to create a new thread since it was different enough from the
>>> last one (Migration almost complete).
>>>
>>>
>>
Hi,
On 6/1/2007 1:38 PM, Marc-Henri Fernandez wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
> thanks for your help. My bacula version : 1.38.11
> As I was very tired, I forgot the definition of the client, this is the
> definition :
>
> /etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf
>
> Client {
> Name = "windows 2000 server"
> # Addres
Hi,
On 6/1/2007 9:06 AM, Andreas Helmcke wrote:
> On 31.05.2007 23:35, Arno Lehmann wrote:
>> On 5/31/2007 11:13 PM, Andreas Helmcke wrote:
>>> BTW: I don't understand why the example tapealert line checks for errors of
>>> the
>>> *changer* instead of checking the tapedrive.
>> That's some SCSI
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 10:04:48 -0700, velociraptor said:
>
> I'm having a weird problem with my tests of bacula for our install.
>
> For the most part everything was going well--my autochanger tests fine
> using btape as do the individual tapes drives, basic job defs, clients
> on two differe
> On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:23:10 -0400, Ryan Novosielski said:
>
> Emery Guevremont wrote:
> > Michel Meyers wrote:
> > Emery Guevremont wrote:
> >
> Hello,
>
> I'm in the middle of trying to bextract a file that's encrypted on a
> volume. Here's the command I ran:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
See the manual about bextract.
Juan Caracoche wrote:
> Hello...
> I have a bacula volume file generated by bacula. I'm using the version 1.36.
> This file was generated a long time ago and obviously the database
> records related with this volume has
Hello...
I have a bacula volume file generated by bacula. I'm using the version 1.36.
This file was generated a long time ago and obviously the database
records related with this volume has been deleted. So now i wat to open
this file because y want to restore one directory from this volume.
Any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Emery Guevremont wrote:
> Michel Meyers wrote:
> Emery Guevremont wrote:
>
Hello,
I'm in the middle of trying to bextract a file that's encrypted on a
volume. Here's the command I ran:
> [...]
>
I've got the pem f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
velociraptor wrote:
> I'm having a weird problem with my tests of bacula for our install.
>
> For the most part everything was going well--my autochanger tests fine
> using btape as do the individual tapes drives, basic job defs, clients
> on two diff
I'm having a weird problem with my tests of bacula for our install.
For the most part everything was going well--my autochanger tests fine
using btape as do the individual tapes drives, basic job defs, clients
on two different OSes (Gentoo & RHEL AS 4), etc. My director's OS is
Gentoo 2.6.20-gent
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 5/31/2007 8:26 PM, Doug Breshears wrote:
>
>> I decided to create a new thread since it was different enough from the
>> last one (Migration almost complete).
>>
>>
>> Version: 2.0.3
>> Platform: Ubuntu Dapper (BTW, if anybod
Hi,
I created a Bacula Rescue CD. The make log can be found here:
http://pastebin.ca/528415
After that, I copied the .iso file to a computer with a CD writer and
burned the image. The CD boots normal, however when reaching the point
where the kernel tries to execute /init it panics because n
Michel Meyers wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Emery Guevremont wrote:
Hello,
I'm in the middle of trying to bextract a file that's encrypted on a
volume. Here's the command I ran:
[...]
I've got the pem file of the client copied on this machine, but I don't
kn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Emery Guevremont wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm in the middle of trying to bextract a file that's encrypted on a
> volume. Here's the command I ran:
[...]
>
> I've got the pem file of the client copied on this machine, but I don't
> know how I'm supposed to
Hello,
I'm in the middle of trying to bextract a file that's encrypted on a
volume. Here's the command I ran:
bextract -V 24 -b /var/bacula/backup-dir.restore.4.bsr -v /dev/nst0 /tmp
and here's the error message I got:
bextract: match.c:249 add_fname_to_include prefix=0 gzip=0 fname=/
bext
Hi,
thanks for your help. My bacula version : 1.38.11
As I was very tired, I forgot the definition of the client, this is the
definition :
/etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf
Client {
Name = "windows 2000 server"
# Address = serveur-bd.tourisport.fr
Address = 192.168.133.128
FDPort = 9102
Catalog = M
Wolfgang Denk schrieb:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
>> I can not confirm this, I also use 1.38.11 on 64bit and 32bit systems. I
>> restored a large 64bit oracle database to a 32 bit system without a
>> problem, at least there where no problem with bacula. Oracle had more,
>>
On 31.05.2007 23:35, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> On 5/31/2007 11:13 PM, Andreas Helmcke wrote:
>>
>> BTW: I don't understand why the example tapealert line checks for errors of
>> the
>> *changer* instead of checking the tapedrive.
>
> That's some SCSI special effect :-)
>
> As I learnt, autochangers
22 matches
Mail list logo
