Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula ask for a volume which has inchanger=no ?!?!?

2007-05-20 Thread Adam Cécile
Arno Lehmann a écrit : > Hello, > > On 5/18/2007 9:02 AM, Adam Cécile wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Today my director was blocked. >> It was asking for a volume which had inchangler flag set to no while >> there was 4 purged volume in the right pool. >> I had to load the volume into the drive manually (

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula ask for a volume which has inchanger=no ?!?!?

2007-05-20 Thread Adam Cécile
Hi, Somes backups should start at 12h today, and 'st dir' already show they're going to the wrong volume. ### st dir Scheduled Jobs: Level Type Pri Scheduled Name Volume === Full

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula: cannot restore - error wile restoring

2007-05-20 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 5/20/2007 1:41 PM, Schulenburg, Manfred wrote: > Hi, > > I have a serious problem restoring files and catalog from bacula-tapes. > > I am using bacula with the wxconsole on Windows. When I click on restore > and fill in what I want to do (same result with any option), a window > saying "b

[Bacula-users] bacula: cannot restore - error wile restoring

2007-05-20 Thread Schulenburg, Manfred
Hi, I have a serious problem restoring files and catalog from bacula-tapes. I am using bacula with the wxconsole on Windows. When I click on restore and fill in what I want to do (same result with any option), a window saying "building restore tree.." shows up for a second and then closes. I just

[Bacula-users] many servers, multiple catalogs ?

2007-05-20 Thread Mikael Kermorgant
Hello, We've been using bacula for a long time now and plan to expand its usage to a new group of servers, managed by a different group of system admins. It will still be the same bacula server which will be doing the backup but I think we'll set up some acls to isolate access to the relevant se

Re: [Bacula-users] DVD backup not starting

2007-05-20 Thread Lucio Crusca
I wrote: > Since Etch includes version 7.0 and > there isn't a patch for that version, I've assumed that 7.0 already has the > patch included upstream. I've checked that: upstream sources aren't patched but Debian ones are, from version 7.0-2 of the package (my setup has 7.0-4): http://bugs.deb