[Bacula-users] Feedback too...

Bacula is working here with Dell PowerVault 124T with LTO3 (400GB uncompressed) and 2 Magazines (=16 Slots) too (running on linux of course ;)). Greetings, Martin Grasberger - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future o

Re: [Bacula-users] Unimplemented Verify level (but Level =VolumeToCatalog)

YES! Thanks very much Martin!! :) Greetings, User100 > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Martin Simmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Jänner 2007 19:48 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Betreff: Re: [Bacula-users] Unimplemented Ve

[Bacula-users] Bacula TLS - very brief how-to

I wrote this up months ago, but only published it recently. Bacula - Transport Layer Security (TLS) http://www.freebsddiary.org/bacula-tls.php It is very basic. -- Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php PGCon - The PostgreSQL C

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore problem using Bacula 2.0.1 and wx-console

Hi Arno, Thanks for the confirmation. Sure, I can report the bug. Thanks, Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arno Lehmann Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:54 PM To: Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Re

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore problem using Bacula 2.0.1 and wx-console

Hi, On 1/25/2007 11:22 PM, David Hatcher wrote: > Hi Arno, > > No, there are no error messages. I wish there were so I could have some > idea what's happening. I just performed another test. If I leave the > default settings alone, I can click "OK" and the restore job will run. > But as soon a

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore problem using Bacula 2.0.1 and wx-console

Hi, On 1/25/2007 10:04 PM, David Hatcher wrote: > > Thanks John, although when I review the "Console" tab, the "Type your > command below" field is grayed out and won't accept input from the > keyboard. But are there any error messages (or anything ineresting at all) in the output area of wxc

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore problem using Bacula 2.0.1 and wx-console

Thanks John, although when I review the "Console" tab, the "Type your command below" field is grayed out and won't accept input from the keyboard. I'm trying to think if I configured anything incorrectly but I haven't come up with anything yet. -Dave -Original Message- From:

Re: [Bacula-users] More help with DVDs

Hi, On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 13:39 -0500, Andrew Fabian wrote: > Sorry to keep coming to this list with problems. The good news is that > I'm installing Bacula at a few different locations as quickly as I can > get it running, and using the newest features in Bacula. And everyone > likes it. Goo

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore problem using Bacula 2.0.1 and wx-console

Hi Arno, No, there are no error messages. I wish there were so I could have some idea what's happening. I just performed another test. If I leave the default settings alone, I can click "OK" and the restore job will run. But as soon as I change any values, the "OK" button becomes grayed out (de

Re: [Bacula-users] tape marked full, but has 340GB free, now says 635 billion bytes for a 400GB tape.

Oh :-) Now I see what you mean. No, I did not know that. It makes sense though. Thanks again sir. Nick On 1/25/07, John Drescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Wow, you must really think I'm oblivious. I should try to word my > > questions better :) > > > > Yes, I understand that flipping a

Re: [Bacula-users] tape marked full, but has 340GB free, now says 635 billion bytes for a 400GB tape.

> Wow, you must really think I'm oblivious. I should try to word my > questions better :) > > Yes, I understand that flipping a bit does not allow data on tape to > magically reorganize itself on the tape. It must be rewritten of > course. > No sorry, I did not mean that. I meant that a tape can

Re: [Bacula-users] tape marked full, but has 340GB free, now says 635 billion bytes for a 400GB tape.

This is the whole story. The first time I wrote to the tape after running btape (including the autochanger test) was part of a full backup to 7 tapes. All the tapes filled to 400 Gigs roughly except this one, which errored at 52 Gigs at which point bacula moved to the next appendable volume. Ne

Re: [Bacula-users] tape marked full, but has 340GB free, now says 635 billion bytes for a 400GB tape.

Hello, On 1/25/2007 6:53 PM, Nick Jones wrote: > I had a bad tape recently > > I have tried to verify if the tape is good or not, but I've run into > another issue. > > It now wrote the tape fine, and didn't error out at > Bytes=52,398,230,131. However, it wrote way more bytes that what > will

[Bacula-users] Restore problem using Bacula 2.0.1 and wx-console

Greetings, I just updated my Bacula server (Fedora Core 5), my Windows 2003 server, and my Windows XP PC from Bacula v1.38.6 to v2.0.1. I'm running the Bacula wx-console from my PC to perform some backup and restore tests on my Win2003 server. My backup tests ran great. However, if I use the "R

Re: [Bacula-users] tape marked full, but has 340GB free, now says 635 billion bytes for a 400GB tape.

> The drive has hardware data compression that saves tape space by > compressing each packet sent to the drive. Although the manufacture > will claim 2:1 (and call the tape a 800GB tape) is the norm this > number is highly dependent on your data. Remember that compressed data > does compress a seco

[Bacula-users] More help with DVDs

Sorry to keep coming to this list with problems. The good news is that I'm installing Bacula at a few different locations as quickly as I can get it running, and using the newest features in Bacula. And everyone likes it. So today's problem is handling DVD backups. I've got a backup system

Re: [Bacula-users] tape marked full, but has 340GB free, now says 635 billion bytes for a 400GB tape.

I apologize, I understand compression and read the FAQ and documentation. My question arises amidst earlier tape errors with this particular tape and the fact that all the other tapes become full at just over 400 billion bytes, or 400 gigs. So, ok, all of a sudden compression is on. I think it m

Re: [Bacula-users] tape marked full, but has 340GB free, now says 635 billion bytes for a 400GB tape.

> > So, ok, all of a sudden compression is on. I think it must have been > enabled when I was messing with btape trying to test the "bad" tape. > If this is the case though, then I wonder why compression wasn't > enabled the first time I ran btape on these exact same tapes/drive > (note: on the la

Re: [Bacula-users] Unimplemented Verify level (but Level = VolumeToCatalog)

> On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:28:47 +0100, User100 said: > > Can anybody give me a tip why I get "Unimplemented Verify level" when I try > to make a verify but specified "Level = VolumeToCatalog"? I´m using Bacula > 1.38.11 > ... > I don´t know from where he get "Verify Level: Full" - If I star

Re: [Bacula-users] tape marked full, but has 340GB free, now says 635 billion bytes for a 400GB tape.

On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, John Drescher wrote: > BTW (dev team), Is this info in the docs or faq anywhere? I believe I > have answered this question 20 times or more "All modern drives have hardware compres

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore problem using Bacula 2.0.1 and wx-console

> I just updated my Bacula server (Fedora Core 5), my Windows 2003 server, and > my Windows XP PC from Bacula v1.38.6 to v2.0.1. I'm running the Bacula > wx-console from my PC to perform some backup and restore tests on my Win2003 > server. My backup tests ran great. However, if I use the

Re: [Bacula-users] Rif: GUI interface

Op 16-jan-2007, om 19:33 heeft Kern Sibbald het volgende geschreven: Hmm. Yes, bacon is not bad, and probably better than badmin. The only downside is that I am vegetarian :-) after second though, being vegetarian wouldn't stop me from using a nice name like that. The only advantage of

Re: [Bacula-users] tape marked full, but has 340GB free, now says 635 billion bytes for a 400GB tape.

On 1/25/07, Nick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had a bad tape recently > > I have tried to verify if the tape is good or not, but I've run into > another issue. > > It now wrote the tape fine, and didn't error out at > Bytes=52,398,230,131. However, it wrote way more bytes that what > will

Re: [Bacula-users] tape marked full, but has 340GB free, now says 635 billion bytes for a 400GB tape.

I had a bad tape recently I have tried to verify if the tape is good or not, but I've run into another issue. It now wrote the tape fine, and didn't error out at Bytes=52,398,230,131. However, it wrote way more bytes that what will fit on the tape. It is a 400 GB LTO-3 tape. | 22 | tape7

[Bacula-users] Bacula Tape format and Upgrading to 2.0.x

Hello All,After reading about the improvements to the autoloader functionality of 2.0, I am thinking about doing an upgrade soon. I am currently running 1.38.11. So far I haven't really run into any issue with 1.38.11 so I didn't want to "rock-the-boat" so soon after getting everything configu

[Bacula-users] Feedback

Hi, We have bacula running OK with this devices: Tape Drive: Vendor ID: 'HP ' Product ID: 'Ultrium 2-SCSI ' Revision: 'F7BP' Autochanger: Vendor ID: 'HP ' Product ID: 'ThinStor AutoLdr' Revision: 'N12r' Both in Linux, and both belong to an HP StorageWorks 1/8. Add this to the list o

Re: [Bacula-users] 2.0 and Autochangers

On Wednesday 24 January 2007 19:34, Michael Nelson wrote: > I would encourage anyone who has had trouble with an autochanger under > versions of bacula < 2.0 to upgrade to the latest version. I used to > struggle and kick and scream every time I had to change out the tapes in > the magazine on my

Re: [Bacula-users] ClientRunBeforeJob (XP Client) Crashes -- Me Too

I never saw this on the developer's alias so it took me a lot longer to see it. Anyways, the simplest way to handle paths with spaces is don't put them in. :-) If you just put the program name in then Bacula will search using the same rules that cmd.exe uses (current directory, Bacula bin directo

Re: [Bacula-users] Win2k Automated Upgrade from 1.3x to 2.0

Vladimir Doisan wrote: > I think there is a bit of work needed to get the update 1.38 to 2.0 > happen automatically. > If I understand correctly, you stop service, copy files, start service. > Which would work just perfectly for upgrades 1.38.x -> 1.38.y > and with slight path modifications it will

Re: [Bacula-users] Win2k Automated Upgrade from 1.3x to 2.0

Necessary, there are two command line parsers that get run. The one in the Windows wrapper code which uses / and the one in the underlying Bacula code that uses -. The /install, /remove, /service, etc are all interpreted by the wrapper. The install command just takes whatever comes after the /in

Re: [Bacula-users] Win2k Automated Upgrade from 1.3x to 2.0

Hello, On 1/25/2007 9:27 AM, Robert Nelson wrote: > Ah I just noticed a small omission :-) (One that would cause the installed > service not to work :-O. > > Install should be: > > "c:\Program Files\bacula\bin\bacula-fd" /install -c "C:\Documents and > Settings\All Users\Application Data\bacula\

Re: [Bacula-users] Win2k Automated Upgrade from 1.3x to 2.0

Ah I just noticed a small omission :-) (One that would cause the installed service not to work :-O. Install should be: "c:\Program Files\bacula\bin\bacula-fd" /install -c "C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\bacula\bacula-fd.conf" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTE

[Bacula-users] Unimplemented Verify level (but Level = VolumeToCatalog)

Can anybody give me a tip why I get "Unimplemented Verify level" when I try to make a verify but specified "Level = VolumeToCatalog"? I´m using Bacula 1.38.11 Just the important (it make´s no difference if I specify the Level in the JobDefs or directly in the Job): JobDefs { Name = "Vorlage1

Re: [Bacula-users] windows xp sp2 and powerfile c200 disc changer

No chance of that working until I issue a new update to mtx. I have a C200 and it has a rather severe bug that I have a fix for. As for not showing up with scsilist that is a separate issue. The C200 driver doesn't create a normal WIN32 device name. So you have to enter the setupapi Device Inte

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent jobs

Hello, On 1/25/2007 7:30 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: > > ...during the concurrent jobs running in the night, I got thousands of > lines like this: > > 25-Jan 07:23 mail-dir: officeJob.2007-01-24_21.03.00 Warning: > sql_create.c:831 More than one Filename! 2 for file: > > ...what does it mean?

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem: Bacula don't use a new tape

Hello, On 1/25/2007 5:04 AM, Ralf Winkler wrote: > Well, i did update the volumes several times, set the current to used > and then bacula used a new one. But after 24 hours still use the same. > Don't tell me i have to make it once for all "tapes". I don't think Kern suggested to set the volume

Re: [Bacula-users] Win2k Automated Upgrade from 1.3x to 2.0

Hello, On 1/25/2007 8:54 AM, Robert Nelson wrote: > Don't use sc.exe, you won't get all the parameters right. > > You should be able to use winbacula-2.0.1.exe /s. > > If you just want to remove or install the services use the following > commands: > > c:\bacula\bin\bacula-fd /remove > > c:\Pr