Am Donnerstag, 3. August 2006 07:37 schrieb Beda Kosata:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Wednesday 02 August 2006 17:46, Mike Reinehr wrote:
> >>On Wednesday 02 August 2006 04:09 am, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >>>On Wednesday 02 August 2006 10:58, Beda Kosata wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >On Wedn
Dan Langille wrote:
> On 1 Aug 2006 at 8:49, Skylar Thompson wrote:
>
>
>> I just installed Bacula 1.38 in FreeBSD, using a Postgres backend.
>> bacula-dir starts up fine, but when I start up bconsole to go to label a
>> tape I get a segfault.
>>
>
> I'm using FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE, and Posgr
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 21:48 +0100, Orallo Orallo wrote:
> Peeps is American slang or short for people, ergo, my peeps, equals my
> people... my gang, my posse, etc, etc. Not derrogatory at all, its an
> all inclusive howdy to the crowd.
"Hello Peeps" was/is also a catchphrase of Harry Enfield in
That works perfectly, thanks.
And to respond to Orallo, I'll fall back on my German heritage and
plead ignorance on the peeps slang thing even though I live in the US.
E
On Aug 3, 2006, at 2:56 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Thursday 03 August 2006 20:45, Erich Prinz wrote:
>> Hi All (peeps??
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 12:24:12 -0700, Jo Rhett said:
>
> I would deeply appreciate anyone who would look at this situation and
> clue me in on what I'm doing wrong here.
Check out the use catalog= bconsole command. You didn't post the Client
definitions, but I'll bet that they use the Cat
Ok,
I'll take care of number 1 (no pun intended either)
Peeps is American slang or short for people, ergo, my peeps, equals my people... my gang, my posse, etc, etc. Not derrogatory at all, its an all inclusive howdy to the crowd.
Best regards,
Orallo
On 8/3/06, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you are OK with catalog data as opposed to on-tape data, check out
"query".
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - Systems Programmer III
|$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922)
On 1 Aug 2006 at 8:49, Skylar Thompson wrote:
> I just installed Bacula 1.38 in FreeBSD, using a Postgres backend.
> bacula-dir starts up fine, but when I start up bconsole to go to label a
> tape I get a segfault.
I'm using FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE, and PosgreSQL 8.1.3, and Bacula 1.38.8
What versio
On Thursday 03 August 2006 20:45, Erich Prinz wrote:
> Hi All (peeps?? I'm still waiting to see a response on that one)
Me too.
>
> 1. Does the estimate command in bconsole factor in the exclusions?
I think so.
>
> 2. How do we determine if the exclusions are working?
Try the following:
On Aug 2, 2006, at 07:58, Skylar Thompson wrote:
Skylar Thompson wrote:
I just installed Bacula 1.38 in FreeBSD, using a Postgres backend.
bacula-dir starts up fine, but when I start up bconsole to go to
label a
tape I get a segfault. I've tried running at debug 1024. This is
what I
get o
Hi All (peeps?? I'm still waiting to see a response on that one)
1. Does the estimate command in bconsole factor in the exclusions?
2. How do we determine if the exclusions are working?
Thanks,
Erich
-
Take Surveys. Ea
> Now the 'update slots' command does not recognize the
> number of slots in my autochanger [1] anymore.
>
Check the permissions for your changer device (/dev/sg5).
Does storage daemon have rightsto access it? If SD is running as bacula:disk
as I expect, sg5 should have group disk with group privil
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 12:05:38PM +0100, Alan Brown wrote:
> In any case it is _unlikely_ that it will make any appearance in 1.38 at
> all unless someone backports it.
> My coding skills are lousy. I'm prepared to wait.
I wasn't pushing for a fix. I've already patched the local message. I jus
Because you can have a JobDef that references the client, or not, as you
choose. This way you could have a JobDef to help you generalize 6
different backup jobs on the same host, right?
Generalization permits flexibility.
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 11:39:30AM +0100, Duarte Santos wrote:
> Yes, what
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 17:50 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Thursday 03 August 2006 16:11, Russell Howe wrote:
> > Tom Newton wrote, sometime around 03/08/06 15:05:
> > > On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 14:57 +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
> > >> It should be a path which exists on the target client.
> > >
> >
On Thursday 03 August 2006 16:11, Russell Howe wrote:
> Tom Newton wrote, sometime around 03/08/06 15:05:
> > On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 14:57 +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
> >> It should be a path which exists on the target client.
> >
> > Tried "C:/tmp" which I *know* exists, but still getting the same
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> What's needed is the ability to define multiple mediatypes per tape drive.
>
> Unfortunately it is a lot more complicated than that, but 1.39 gets half way
> there.
That's good to hear.
I'm sure it get very complicated very quickly, but having achieved
Will bextract allow me to get the raw file out of my volume? I am really
struggling to see how it works from the docs.
--
Tom Newton
SmoothWall Limited
1 John Charles Way
Leeds
LS12 6QA
United Kingdom
www.smoothwall.net
Phone: +44-(0)870 1 999 500
DDI: +44-(0)113 38 74 166
Fax: +44-(0)870 1
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 16:17 +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
> Tom Newton wrote, sometime around 03/08/06 16:13:
> > On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 16:07 +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
> >> are you running the exact same versions of bacula on director, file
> >> daemon and storage daemon? If you're not, things can g
On Thursday 03 August 2006 15:14, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> >> I have a situation where we are about to add LTO3 drives to our changer,
> >> which currently has LTO2 drives and media onboard.
> >>
> >> For obvious reasons I want to be able to use the LTO2 tape
Tom Newton wrote, sometime around 03/08/06 16:13:
> On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 16:07 +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
>> are you running the exact same versions of bacula on director, file
>> daemon and storage daemon? If you're not, things can get 'interesting'...
>
> Ah! You may be onto something! The ver
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 16:07 +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
> Tom Newton wrote, sometime around 03/08/06 16:04:
> > Actually.. there is a reset comes from the FD - the last packet with any
> > data contains:
> >
> > ..2000 O K Job Wi
> > 0050 6e 64 6f 77 73 20 58 50 2c 4d 56 53 2c 4e 54 20 ndows
>
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> I have a situation where we are about to add LTO3 drives to our changer,
>> which currently has LTO2 drives and media onboard.
>>
>> For obvious reasons I want to be able to use the LTO2 tapes in the LTO3
>> drives, but I also have to prevent any attempts
Tom Newton wrote, sometime around 03/08/06 16:04:
> Actually.. there is a reset comes from the FD - the last packet with any
> data contains:
>
> ..2000 O K Job Wi
> 0050 6e 64 6f 77 73 20 58 50 2c 4d 56 53 2c 4e 54 20 ndows
> XP ,MVS,NT
>
> anyone want to see a dump?
Hm, not me :)
Still,
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 15:30 +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
> Tom Newton wrote, sometime around 03/08/06 15:19:
> > On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 15:11 +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
> >> It said the fd closed the connection - anything in the FD's logs (on the
> >> Windows box) explaining why?
> >
> > Where might
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 15:30 +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
> Tom Newton wrote, sometime around 03/08/06 15:19:
> > On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 15:11 +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
> >> It said the fd closed the connection - anything in the FD's logs (on the
> >> Windows box) explaining why?
> >
> > Where might
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Thursday 03 August 2006 13:25, Alan Brown wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
>>
>>
Schedule {
Name = "EveryOtherTuesday"
Run = Level=Full tue w00,w02,w04,w06,w08,w10,w12(etc to
week 52) at 22:00
}
>>>
>>>Some years h
Kern Sibbald wrote, sometime around 03/08/06 13:54:
> On Thursday 03 August 2006 13:56, Russell Howe wrote:
>> Unless you specify that Windows backups are written in 'portable'
>> format, the Windows backup API is used which writes data in its own
>> 'special' (for 'special' read 'proprietary').
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 14:54 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Thursday 03 August 2006 13:56, Russell Howe wrote:
> > Tom Newton wrote, sometime around 03/08/06 12:44:
> > > On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 12:15 +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
> > >> Choose the 'mod' option when running a restore job and alter the c
Tom Newton wrote, sometime around 03/08/06 15:19:
> On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 15:11 +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
>> It said the fd closed the connection - anything in the FD's logs (on the
>> Windows box) explaining why?
>
> Where might I find such a log?
Hmmm.. I thought it kept one, although I fail
Hello,
I upgraded from 1.38.0 to 1.38.11 (28 June 2006), all running on FC4.
Now the 'update slots' command does not recognize the number of slots in my
autochanger [1] anymore. Here is the console conversation:
*update slots storage=tape1
Enter autochanger drive[0]: 0
Connecting to
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Thursday 03 August 2006 13:25, Alan Brown wrote:
>> On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
>>
Schedule {
Name = "EveryOtherTuesday"
Run = Level=Full tue w00,w02,w04,w06,w08,w10,w12(etc to
week 52) at 22:00
}
>>> Some years have
Tom Newton wrote, sometime around 03/08/06 14:44:
> Any idea why it fails to back up to another windows XP box? effectively
Do you mean "restore (files) to" instead of "back up to"?
> one of its siblings... should I change the path from /tmp?
It should be a path which exists on the target client
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 15:11 +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
> Tom Newton wrote, sometime around 03/08/06 15:05:
> > On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 14:57 +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
> >> It should be a path which exists on the target client.
> >
> > Tried "C:/tmp" which I *know* exists, but still getting the same
Tom Newton wrote, sometime around 03/08/06 15:05:
> On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 14:57 +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
>> It should be a path which exists on the target client.
>
> Tried "C:/tmp" which I *know* exists, but still getting the same errors.
> Starting to really get me down this one.
From your p
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 14:57 +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
> Tom Newton wrote, sometime around 03/08/06 14:44:
> > Any idea why it fails to back up to another windows XP box? effectively
>
> Do you mean "restore (files) to" instead of "back up to"?
Sorry, i mean restore to, yes.. its another XP Pro b
On Thursday 03 August 2006 12:51, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Dirk Kleinhesselink wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Alan Brown wrote:
> >
> > Well, there is NO such thing as an LTO-4 drive.
>
> Yet
>
> It's in the LTO development roadmap.
>
> > They are both LTO-3 drives.
> > I
On Thursday 03 August 2006 13:56, Russell Howe wrote:
> Tom Newton wrote, sometime around 03/08/06 12:44:
> > On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 12:15 +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
> >> Choose the 'mod' option when running a restore job and alter the client.
> >> That one's gotta be in the manual, surely? :)
> >
Hi Kern,
Sorry for the inconvenience but the manual only tells what to do from the
source and not if you download a rpm, but I went and downloaded the source and
chanana how's your mother or should I say bob's your uncle and suzie is your
auntie it worked. I had some problems with the configure
On Thursday 03 August 2006 13:25, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
>
> >> Schedule {
> >> Name = "EveryOtherTuesday"
> >> Run = Level=Full tue w00,w02,w04,w06,w08,w10,w12(etc to
> >> week 52) at 22:00
> >> }
> >
> > Some years have 53 weeks!
>
> Eve
Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 05:45:43PM +0100, Alan Brown wrote:
>
>> IE: double the network load.
>>
>> In order to achieve bit-identical backups, one would need to snapshot the
>> filesystem before starting the backups and release the snapshot afterwards
>> (Assuming LVM or
Alan Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
>
>>> Schedule {
>>> Name = "EveryOtherTuesday"
>>> Run = Level=Full tue w00,w02,w04,w06,w08,w10,w12(etc to
>>> week 52) at 22:00
>>> }
>> Some years have 53 weeks!
>
> Every year has part of a 53rd week.
>
> A Cale
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 12:15 +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
> Tom Newton wrote, sometime around 03/08/06 12:10:
> > I have a machine that is no longer with us.
> > I wish to restore one or two files from the backup set, but obviously,
> > without that machine, I am stumped - bacula wants to restore to t
The picture visualizing the identities that must match across configuration
files is in the bottom of this manual page:
http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/Customizin_Configurat_Files.html#4456
For me this was the single most important piece of the manual
Steen
On Thursday 03 August 2006 10:21, Ke
Tom Newton wrote, sometime around 03/08/06 12:44:
> On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 12:15 +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
>> Choose the 'mod' option when running a restore job and alter the client.
>> That one's gotta be in the manual, surely? :)
>
> thanks, did not read what that one's for.
>
> Tried it, but
Nothing major
When backing up multiple sets on multiple clients, the current completion
messages aren't clear enough - especially on our SAN/NAS fileservers which
have upwards of 20Tb behind them and ~40 backups sets each.
The fix is simple.
In bacula-dir
Find:
mailcommand = "/usr/sb
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 12:15 +0100, Russell Howe wrote:
> Tom Newton wrote, sometime around 03/08/06 12:10:
> > I have a machine that is no longer with us.
> > I wish to restore one or two files from the backup set, but obviously,
> > without that machine, I am stumped - bacula wants to restore to t
On Thursday 03 August 2006 11:25, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> >> Schedule {
> >> Name = "EveryOtherTuesday"
> >> Run = Level=Full tue w00,w02,w04,w06,w08,w10,w12(etc to
> >> week 52) at 22:00
> >> }
> >
> > Some years have 53 weeks!
>
> Every y
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
>> Schedule {
>> Name = "EveryOtherTuesday"
>> Run = Level=Full tue w00,w02,w04,w06,w08,w10,w12(etc to
>> week 52) at 22:00
>> }
>
> Some years have 53 weeks!
Every year has part of a 53rd week.
A Calendar year is 52 weeks and one day
Tom Newton wrote, sometime around 03/08/06 12:10:
> I have a machine that is no longer with us.
> I wish to restore one or two files from the backup set, but obviously,
> without that machine, I am stumped - bacula wants to restore to the
> client it read from, i'd rather it gave me the files in /t
I have a machine that is no longer with us.
I wish to restore one or two files from the backup set, but obviously,
without that machine, I am stumped - bacula wants to restore to the
client it read from, i'd rather it gave me the files in /tmp on my
server. Can I do this? How?
thanks,
--
Tom New
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Dan Langille wrote:
> Jo, quite simply, you are a damn pain in the ass. If a developer
> does not want to do the fix, there's nothing you can do. Leave it
> alone.
I've had this in as a _polite_ request to Kern for a couple of weeks, and
there's a feature request filed for
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Jo Rhett wrote:
>> In the case of mismatched file daemons it's easy enough to work out which
>> one is playing up by running "status client" on each one.
>
> Nope. No configuration changes since I got that message, and no repeats of
> the message. "status client" worked on e
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Dirk Kleinhesselink wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Alan Brown wrote:
>
> Well, there is NO such thing as an LTO-4 drive.
Yet
It's in the LTO development roadmap.
> They are both LTO-3 drives.
> I'm not sure that media type declaration does anything specific for a "real"
I would like to be able to display which filesets are backed up to a particular
volume (tape) in terms of names, levels and dates. Is that possible?
--
Erik P. Olsen, Civilingeniør, MSc
Solsortvej 30, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Phone: +45 38346480, Fax: +45 38346470, Mobil: +45 40765300
---
Jo Rhett wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:56:40PM +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
>> Anyway I could enter epohost into /etc/hosts but the dhcp server does not
>> allways give epohost the same address on the lan. Can a script be made
>> to detect the correct IP-address and then update /etc/hosts ac
On Thursday 03 August 2006 11:06, Steen wrote:
> Does it mean that I can install the source rpm and then use your script to
> build a 'real' rpm for any rpm-based distro, or for the ones that you have
> provided parameters for?
>
> Am I understanding this almost correctly?
Yes that is correct -
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 23:38, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since there have been more than the usual number of heated exchanges
> lately, I would like to remind everyone that I prefer that we try to remain
> helpful and avoid four letter and other dubious words even if it isn't
> always ea
Yes, what i don't understand is why the Jobdefs don't work without a
Client option. If Jobdefs can work for every job of every client,
without putting the actual Clients on the Jobdefs option, why is there a
Client option?
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 12:18 +0800, Troy Daniels wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Dua
Does it mean that I can install the source rpm and then use your script to
build a 'real' rpm for any rpm-based distro, or for the ones that you have
provided parameters for?
Am I understanding this almost correctly?
thanks
Steen
On Sunday 30 July 2006 21:38, Scott Barninger wrote:
> Hello al
I didn't realize that you could get one clients things together in one file -
that is tempting.
And the script posibility is promising I think
Steen
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 15:33, John Drescher wrote:
> I do the same but seperate things a lot more I have the following:
>
> bacula-dir-clients
On Thursday 03 August 2006 08:11, Janco van der Merwe wrote:
> Kern,
>
> Sorry to send to your personal addr, but I posted a request yesterday and
unfortunately I haven't received any response.
>
> Is it possible for you to send me a copy the following config files in text
format: bacula-dir.co
Hello,
On Thursday 03 August 2006 09:44, Janco van der Merwe wrote:
> Can you pleease explain the following to me??
Tip 1: Please look at the Support page on our web site. Tip 2: You will find
that it is much better to address these problems to the bacula-users list.
Tip 3:
On Thursday 03 August 2006 07:37, Beda Kosata wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Wednesday 02 August 2006 17:46, Mike Reinehr wrote:
> >
> >>On Wednesday 02 August 2006 04:09 am, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Wednesday 02 August 2006 10:58, Beda Kosata wrote:
> >>>
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
64 matches
Mail list logo
