[Bacula-users] Restore error

2006-07-30 Thread Aykut YILDIZGORUR
Hi,   i am just installed bacula server 1.38.11 to ubuntu linuz server. backup is working good but i can nat restore them :(   my restore command and errors in here.. please help me immediatle     *restore   First you select one or more JobIds that contain filesto be restored. You will be p

[Bacula-users] Restores Issues

2006-07-30 Thread LDB
I recently moved my backup server to another server. I copied over the DB like I was suppose to and the necessary bacula files. I also recently decommissioned a server and I have its old backup as well but I cannot restore it even though its volume exists. I am not sure if this is because the old v

Re: [Bacula-users] Unknown stream type!!! stream=15

2006-07-30 Thread Timo Neuvonen
> In any case, if you find yourself using bscan and bextract, you are > probably using Bacula incorrectly. > > The recommended workaround is to use Bacula to restore file > rather than bextract. It's very likely in the case in question that I was working in a wrong way. Actually, I just had instal

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula version 1.39 feature freeze

2006-07-30 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Sunday 30 July 2006 06:51, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Kern Sibbald writes: > > > At this point, I believe that we have the base code for all the planned new > > features for 1.39 > > Is there a place with a list of features currently worked on? > I recall seeing a list at one point, but don't

Re: [Bacula-users] label a tape replacement

2006-07-30 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Sunday 30 July 2006 00:05, Mark Nienberg wrote: > I recently had a problem that made me want to erase and relabel a bacula tape, > keeping its same name so it would stay in the same spot in the tape rotation scheme. > I recycled and purged the volume in the catalog, then deleted the volume

Re: [Bacula-users] Unknown stream type!!! stream=15

2006-07-30 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Sunday 30 July 2006 00:32, Timo Neuvonen wrote: > > > **2** Before running the bscan, I also ran bextract with the same tape, > and > > > it looks to me that those few files that had acls in use, had obviously > lost > > > all acl information. At that time there also were messages that > mention