On Thursday 29 June 2006 00:18, Jo Rhett wrote:
> Is there any possible way for Bacula to randomize the full backups
> across
> the week, or otherwise spread them out?
>
> Like most large facilities, we're backing up a terabytes every night.
> Trying to juggle which systems get full backups on whic
On Thursday 29 June 2006 00:18, Jo Rhett wrote:
> I'm wondering if any others have some complex schedules they can
> document
> for examples. The schedules documented are pretty basic.
>
> For example, the director didn't barf reading this, but will this work?
>
>Run = Level=Full Pool=Quarterl
Hi people,
I have a HP DAT 72x6 autochanger external tape drive. After reading
the most recent Bacula Manual, I am a bit confused as to whether I need to put
an Autochanger resource definition in the SD conf file.
The example that I have modified is this, is it sufficient?:
# A Linu
Priorities here do not play a role.Storage everywhere different.The system is set up on parallel runs of jobs.
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application S
Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm wondering if any others have some complex schedules they can
> document
> for examples. The schedules documented are pretty basic.
>
> For example, the director didn't barf reading this, but will this work?
>
>Run = Level=Full Pool=Quarterly on 1s
Is there any possible way for Bacula to randomize the full backups
across
the week, or otherwise spread them out?
Like most large facilities, we're backing up a terabytes every night.
Trying to juggle which systems get full backups on which day of the week
has become almost a full time job.
Ama
I'm wondering if any others have some complex schedules they can
document
for examples. The schedules documented are pretty basic.
For example, the director didn't barf reading this, but will this work?
Run = Level=Full Pool=Quarterly on 1st sun jan,april,jul,oct at 12:05
Run = Level=Ful
Maybe this is just a typo or bad manual copy and paste, but /bin/sh is
a link to /bin/bash, but you cite rootSbin.list. Is bash in /bin or
/sbin? IIRC, it is normally in /bin so normal users have access.
HTH,
Jeff
Quoting Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am posting this again, as I have no
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:17:23 -0700 (PDT), said:
>
> After moving my catalog from one postgres server to a new one I am now
> getting the
> following warnings (but the backups seem to be working):
>
> 27-Jun 19:09 fileserver-dir: user-private.2006-06-27_19.09.19 Error:
> sql_create.c:470
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 05:02, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Searching for a new distro is not so easy. Kubuntu treats users as idiots by
> disabling the root account and giving full sudo privilege to the main user.
Well, I suppose...but I've found it quite easy to adapt. I suppose you could
say it
Forgot to put the list on CC.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rumko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jun 28, 2006 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] 1.38.10 bacula-dir with the scheduler patch crashed
To: Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
As is visible from the attachement in my previous
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 17:06, Rumko wrote:
> I had 2 jobs working in parallel on the same pool and same tape drive
> (and ofcourse same volume). Did a status storage=DAT72 (DAT72 is the
> name of the device in sd) ... it stopped in the middle of the output
> (when it wanted to print what jobs ar
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 17:37, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> I'm confused at this point as well. The R5000 does not report back as
> 64-bit, but I see from reading Wiki that the first 64-bit chip was
> R4000. I have an R8000 that is, but my R4400's and R5000's are all 32
> according to the OS.
The i
After moving my catalog from one postgres server to a new one I am now getting
the
following warnings (but the backups seem to be working):
27-Jun 19:09 fileserver-dir: user-private.2006-06-27_19.09.19 Error:
sql_create.c:470 More than one Client!: 2
27-Jun 19:09 fileserver-dir: No prior Full bac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm confused at this point as well. The R5000 does not report back as
64-bit, but I see from reading Wiki that the first 64-bit chip was
R4000. I have an R8000 that is, but my R4400's and R5000's are all 32
according to the OS.
As far as running 32-bi
Good morning,
We have been running Bacula on a few webservers with great success but
we find we need to reduce the retention period on one server. We
currently have the following setup.
Pool {
Name = Inc-Pool
Pool Type = Backup
Recycle = yes
AutoPrune = yes
Volume Retention = 8 d
I had 2 jobs working in parallel on the same pool and same tape drive
(and ofcourse same volume). Did a status storage=DAT72 (DAT72 is the
name of the device in sd) ... it stopped in the middle of the output
(when it wanted to print what jobs are waiting to reserve the drive)
and I did a ctrl+c ..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Santa Claus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Further I start jobs:
> "file1-to-pool1"
> and
> "restore.files" (restore all, jobid=2)
>
> >Running Jobs:
> >Console connected at 28-Jun-06 15:32
> > JobId Level Name Status
> >=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Santa Claus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is my config in attached files.
[...]
> Further I start jobs:
> "file1-to-pool1"
> and
> "restore.files" (restore all, jobid=2)
>
> >Running Jobs:
> >Console connected at 28-Jun-06 15:32
> > JobId Level Name
> Have you run the btape tests, and did you make sure in the mtx-changer
> script the timeout after loading a tape is long enough, or the function
> waiting for the tape drive works as it should?
>
btape tests were ok.
Timeout problem could make some sense -the drive could make some extra tape
cond
Hi,Here is my config in attached files.I run parallel jobs "file1-to-pool1" and "file2-to-pool2"
>* status dir>JobId Level Name Status>==
> 1 Full file1-to-pool1.2006-06-28_15.32.32 is running> 2
On 28.06.2006, at 15:55, Julien Cigar wrote:
> Yep it's turned on, but I have this messages every time I do a
> *status dir, and nothing is pruned
Have you checked your retention periods? Maybe this volume is just
not "old enough".
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web servi
Yep it's turned on, but I have this messages every time I do a *status
dir, and nothing is pruned
Sebastian Stark wrote:
>
> If you have automatic pruning turned on this is expected behaviour I
> would say.
>
>
> Sebastian
>
> On 28.06.2006, at 15:47, Julien Cigar wrote:
>
>> Hi !
>>
>> I'm usin
If you have automatic pruning turned on this is expected behaviour I
would say.
Sebastian
On 28.06.2006, at 15:47, Julien Cigar wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I'm using 1.38.9 (Debian) with PostgreSQL (8.1.4)
>
> Am I the only one to have this kind of message : 28-Jun 12:39
> phoenix-dir: Pruning oldest
Hi !
I'm using 1.38.9 (Debian) with PostgreSQL (8.1.4)
Am I the only one to have this kind of message : 28-Jun 12:39
phoenix-dir: Pruning oldest volume "Canis-Incr-Disk-0001" when I do a
*status dir ? (nothing is pruned of course)
(Complete output is available on
http://rafb.net/paste/results
Hello,
Bacula version 1.38.10:
Well, this version despite careful testing here, turned out to be a rather
disasterous release because there were a lot of users experiencing either a
deadlocked Director (Linux) or Director crashes (FreeBSD). As best I can
tell, this occurs (occurred) on systems
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 13:26, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 12:32:14 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
> >
> > On Wednesday 28 June 2006 11:57, user100 wrote:
> > > Here:
> > > crw-rw 1 root disk 21, 1 Jun 23 12:26 /dev/sg1
> > > crw-rw 1 root disk 9, 0 Jun 23 12:26 /dev/st
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 12:32:14 +0200, Kern Sibbald said:
>
> On Wednesday 28 June 2006 11:57, user100 wrote:
> > Here:
> > crw-rw 1 root disk 21, 1 Jun 23 12:26 /dev/sg1
> > crw-rw 1 root disk 9, 0 Jun 23 12:26 /dev/st0
> >
> > /etc/init.d/bacula-sd:
> > SD_USER=bacula
> > SD_GROUP=d
No I´m afraid it´s not so easy (while all these test):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bacula]# cat /etc/passwd | grep bacula
bacula:x:101:6:Bacula:/var/bacula:/sbin/nologin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bacula]# cat /etc/group | grep bacula
disk:x:6:root,bacula
bacula:x:101:bacula,postgres
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bacula]#
I t
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 12:13, Tom Yates wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Unfortunately, Bacula is sufficiently demanding that it often brings out
> > driver problems that don't show up using most Unix tape utilities, which
> > tend to be rather "simple" minded. They either si
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 11:57, user100 wrote:
> Here:
> crw-rw 1 root disk 21, 1 Jun 23 12:26 /dev/sg1
> crw-rw 1 root disk 9, 0 Jun 23 12:26 /dev/st0
>
> /etc/init.d/bacula-sd:
> SD_USER=bacula
> SD_GROUP=disk
>
> Standard permissions after installation (I think):
> drwxrwx--- 2 root
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:36:49 -0400, Ryan Novosielski said:
>
> And FYI, I have just retired about 20 IRIX systems, so I have more than
> enough to go around for software testing should that be desirable. I run
> Bacula currently on an IRIX machine to back up a webserver running on
> that hos
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Unfortunately, Bacula is sufficiently demanding that it often brings out
> driver problems that don't show up using most Unix tape utilities, which
> tend to be rather "simple" minded. They either simply write() or read().
> Bacula uses quite a lot more
Here:
crw-rw 1 root disk 21, 1 Jun 23 12:26 /dev/sg1
crw-rw 1 root disk 9, 0 Jun 23 12:26 /dev/st0
/etc/init.d/bacula-sd:
SD_USER=bacula
SD_GROUP=disk
Standard permissions after installation (I think):
drwxrwx--- 2 root bacula 4096 Jun 28 11:30 /var/bacula
[EMAIL PROTECTED] var]# ps -
Hello Users!
I hope someone with autochanger expierience
can help me with my concerns
First of all my environment:
- bacula 1.38.9 (from source)
- mtx 1.2.18rel (from rpm)
- SuSE 9.0 Kernel 2.4.21-99
- Exabyte 221L TapeLibrary (21 slots
in 3 Magazines, Barcodereader, 1 IBM Ultrium LTO-2 driv
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 10:04, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
> > > So, is anyone running autochanger with storage daemon as non-root
> > > (bacula:disk)?
> >
> > I am, on a Debian/sid system with the 1.36.3 packages still:
> >
> > 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ps -ef | grep bacula-sd
> > bacula9101 1 0
> > So, is anyone running autochanger with storage daemon as non-root
> > (bacula:disk)?
>
> I am, on a Debian/sid system with the 1.36.3 packages still:
>
> 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ps -ef | grep bacula-sd
> bacula9101 1 0 Mar12 ?
> 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/bacula-sd -c /etc/bacula/bacula-sd.conf
Hey,
we've been using Bacula for quite some time now. Before that we were
using Arkeia, and one feature I rather liked about Arkeia was that you
could simply create a file called .ARK_NOBACKUP in a directory and
Arkeia would exclude that directory and all of its children from the
backup.
This all
> I think there was a permissionproblem (1.38.10.? - .src.rpm) with the
> "mtx-changer" script itself (/etc/bacula/mtx-changer). When I´m not wrong
> then changing the user in the sd-init-script does not help so good - but I
> don´t know if this was 1.38.10.3 or 1.38.10.1 ...
>
Script is run with u
Hey,
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 07:01, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
> So, is anyone running autochanger with storage daemon as non-root
> (bacula:disk)?
I am, on a Debian/sid system with the 1.36.3 packages still:
0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ps -ef | grep bacula-sd
bacula9101 1 0 Mar12 ?
00:
40 matches
Mail list logo
